- Thank you received: 0
Antigravity Research
17 years 1 month ago #18080
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Something that I think is fairly interesting is, that if we drop an electron into a neg r.i. space, its electric field swops over, so that it looks like a positron but I don't think its magnetic field does.That would mean that at the boundary the two fields ae not going to be ninety degrees apart.
(Edited) I suppose I'd better add why I think this is so important. A blue and a red photon say, will see the barrier at a different radius, they refract. However, the bec is slowing things down and the neg r.i. wants to speed things up, that would mean that this boundary layer is extremely thin. If we want to build a space ship that can go faster than light, we need a skin that alters space at its boundary. An ftl gravity suggests that it can be done for all electromagnetic frequencies. Now if the famous monopole shows up, then the magnetic field is going to flip with the electric field. [] Bummer! [] If not, and it hasn't shown up yet, then we can put inductive and capacitive currents in synch. Again, this is good news for making superlenses that operate across all frequencies.
(Edited) I suppose I'd better add why I think this is so important. A blue and a red photon say, will see the barrier at a different radius, they refract. However, the bec is slowing things down and the neg r.i. wants to speed things up, that would mean that this boundary layer is extremely thin. If we want to build a space ship that can go faster than light, we need a skin that alters space at its boundary. An ftl gravity suggests that it can be done for all electromagnetic frequencies. Now if the famous monopole shows up, then the magnetic field is going to flip with the electric field. [] Bummer! [] If not, and it hasn't shown up yet, then we can put inductive and capacitive currents in synch. Again, this is good news for making superlenses that operate across all frequencies.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 1 month ago #18138
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Monkeying about with this a bit more. I think that this neg r.i. region is of uniform energy density. its bec qualities balance the neg r.i. qualities from the 3km event horizon to the centre. So I want the charge density of electrons to stay the same wherever they are in that sphere. This gives me a possible speed of gravity of 1.797E 10 which is close to the 20 billion times c mark. It's two divided by four pi epsilon zero, the permitivity of free space.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 1 month ago #18083
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Stoat, lots to investigate here regarding cooper pairs and how they operate in superconductor states of matter. Supercurrents -phonons are exchanged between the electrons in this state, it is almost as if the electron has split in half and is still linked in a two-dimensional flatness by a constant exchange of supercurrents that do not turn off and are maintained during the BEC state. Cooper pairs might be a coupling to the HF gravitostatic field itself.
I am trying to visualize how the graviton impacts occur, and if maybe the elysium medium is a by-product of the absorption process whereby a high frequency particle is formed that streams much like light out of everything like a fine mist. It might be that the 'HF-FTL Gravitostatic Field' forms tubes while the Elyson's are a high frequency smaller entity that fills in around the tubes of force giving it structure. A fine mist that is above the light frequency. I am still looking into magnetic effects, cooper pairs, will report back later.
Stoat, I'm back and wanted to continue this discussion regarding 'fine mist' that pours into and out of everything. The Elysium ocean and light waves, I think Elysons are just above the frequency of light but stationary similar to nature of electricity/electrons. Images all arrive at the same time such that the speed of light is exact due to our local sea of Elysium fields [space is electrically active with Elysium] that flow into and out of everything. Problems that need to be addressed:
1.) How do Gravitons interact with Elysium? Gravitons are way to fast to 'swim' through such a fine medium so they must form tubes of force that stream into all mass [as if it is transparant]forming curves following paths of rotation resulting in Galaxy type circulations.
2.) How are Gravitons absorbed? Protons seem to be swimming against the current of streaming gravitons, formed [because of gravitons] in a back eddy relationship that is tied to the opposing reverse rotational forces that balance all motion in Universe. All atomic mass in forward time motion is constantly being regenerated reformed as an integral part of this 'greater stream' of gravitons. The Proton is a key building block to all atomic interactions, and it is also the beginning of the reverse wave. Trailing behind all mass regenerations pouring out of all mass just behind the curve of our 'spectrum time zone' is a reverse wave of antigravitons spiralling back wards at FTL speeds [higher spectrum motion].
3.) Do Gravitons interfere with light waves? Gravitons probably generate light waves as part of the impact process and most likely the huge flaring around galactic centers is the result of high concentrations of Graviton Energy being released into our spectrum.
4.) What generates Elysons and Elysium medium? I would think that the generation of this fine mist is the result of the Atomic interactions with Gravitons.
John Rickey
I am trying to visualize how the graviton impacts occur, and if maybe the elysium medium is a by-product of the absorption process whereby a high frequency particle is formed that streams much like light out of everything like a fine mist. It might be that the 'HF-FTL Gravitostatic Field' forms tubes while the Elyson's are a high frequency smaller entity that fills in around the tubes of force giving it structure. A fine mist that is above the light frequency. I am still looking into magnetic effects, cooper pairs, will report back later.
Stoat, I'm back and wanted to continue this discussion regarding 'fine mist' that pours into and out of everything. The Elysium ocean and light waves, I think Elysons are just above the frequency of light but stationary similar to nature of electricity/electrons. Images all arrive at the same time such that the speed of light is exact due to our local sea of Elysium fields [space is electrically active with Elysium] that flow into and out of everything. Problems that need to be addressed:
1.) How do Gravitons interact with Elysium? Gravitons are way to fast to 'swim' through such a fine medium so they must form tubes of force that stream into all mass [as if it is transparant]forming curves following paths of rotation resulting in Galaxy type circulations.
2.) How are Gravitons absorbed? Protons seem to be swimming against the current of streaming gravitons, formed [because of gravitons] in a back eddy relationship that is tied to the opposing reverse rotational forces that balance all motion in Universe. All atomic mass in forward time motion is constantly being regenerated reformed as an integral part of this 'greater stream' of gravitons. The Proton is a key building block to all atomic interactions, and it is also the beginning of the reverse wave. Trailing behind all mass regenerations pouring out of all mass just behind the curve of our 'spectrum time zone' is a reverse wave of antigravitons spiralling back wards at FTL speeds [higher spectrum motion].
3.) Do Gravitons interfere with light waves? Gravitons probably generate light waves as part of the impact process and most likely the huge flaring around galactic centers is the result of high concentrations of Graviton Energy being released into our spectrum.
4.) What generates Elysons and Elysium medium? I would think that the generation of this fine mist is the result of the Atomic interactions with Gravitons.
John Rickey
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 1 month ago #18085
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
I took a look at the voltage on an electron in vacuo (electron radius taken as 2.4E -15). I get 5.999E 05 V. But if we place an electon in a space of minus one refractive index, where both epsilon (permitivity) and mu (permeability) are minus one, that drops the voltage to -5.31E-06 V. I wonder if this means that an electron has to decrease its radius to ten to the minus twenty six, to conserve its voltage? This would go part way to explaining how scaling works.
I also found an article on the superlens, written by someone with the dame name as the Russian guy that thought up they theory of neg ri materials.(The same gay, or son maybe?) I just glanced at the paper, which is a poor translation, and he says that such a lens violates the uncertainty principle. Maybe worth taking a look at that idea.
(Edited) Oops [] I forgot the minus sign on that second voltage. If we have to just add the two, then the voltage change will be minute.
To tidy up that possible speed of gravity, which I wrote in a really clutzy way [)] it would be 1 / 2pi * 8.854187818E-12. So, it shows an obvious relationship with permitivity and also the 2pi part fits in with the idea of space being viscoelastic.
I also found an article on the superlens, written by someone with the dame name as the Russian guy that thought up they theory of neg ri materials.(The same gay, or son maybe?) I just glanced at the paper, which is a poor translation, and he says that such a lens violates the uncertainty principle. Maybe worth taking a look at that idea.
(Edited) Oops [] I forgot the minus sign on that second voltage. If we have to just add the two, then the voltage change will be minute.
To tidy up that possible speed of gravity, which I wrote in a really clutzy way [)] it would be 1 / 2pi * 8.854187818E-12. So, it shows an obvious relationship with permitivity and also the 2pi part fits in with the idea of space being viscoelastic.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 1 month ago #18092
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Monkeying about with my calculator; still the best boy's toy around [] I thought I'd look at what happens to the radius of an electron when it finds itself in space of a different permitivity. To conserve its charge it has to alter its radius. The equation is,
1 / 4pi * epsilon * q ^ 2 / m c ^2 to get the radius
Then I thought, let's see what happens when I plag in my speed of gravity, which is 17.9 billion times c. I get an answer which is about seven hundredth of h. Now, the permitivity constant is worked out in a vacuum within the "space" of the Earth. It's also not a very good vacuum. So I would suggest that our ftl graviton has a radius of h.
If we have an electron toddling along at, let's say half teh speed of light,close to the centre of our sun, then because it's in a bec, it's "really" going much faster than light. It gets hit by light speed gravitons, which of course are "really" ftl. So each hit looks like a quanta of energy transfered to our electron[8D] Still needs work but i quite like the sound of that.
1 / 4pi * epsilon * q ^ 2 / m c ^2 to get the radius
Then I thought, let's see what happens when I plag in my speed of gravity, which is 17.9 billion times c. I get an answer which is about seven hundredth of h. Now, the permitivity constant is worked out in a vacuum within the "space" of the Earth. It's also not a very good vacuum. So I would suggest that our ftl graviton has a radius of h.
If we have an electron toddling along at, let's say half teh speed of light,close to the centre of our sun, then because it's in a bec, it's "really" going much faster than light. It gets hit by light speed gravitons, which of course are "really" ftl. So each hit looks like a quanta of energy transfered to our electron[8D] Still needs work but i quite like the sound of that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 4 weeks ago #18110
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Hi John, how ftl gravitons interact with matter is the sixty four million dollar question. I think in the short term we have to look at it in terms of electrons and photons. QED has a very accurate model of what happens but not much of a theory as to why. I don't think anyone knows enough about the nucleus to make it very fruitful for us at the moment.
I did send off my musings to my physics guy, and he didn't respond at all. He did respond about something else, so I have to take it that he doesn't think much of my ideas.
I know he doesn't like the idea of ftl gravity but nevertheless, this has taken the wind out of my sails somewhat.
I did send off my musings to my physics guy, and he didn't respond at all. He did respond about something else, so I have to take it that he doesn't think much of my ideas.
I know he doesn't like the idea of ftl gravity but nevertheless, this has taken the wind out of my sails somewhat.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.416 seconds