Antigravity Research

Is there a relationship between negative fields as found in an electron and the crushing implosions of black hole singularities, and the generation of electromagnetic implosions caused by high energy pulsed electromagnetic currents?

Let's first take a look at the Los Alamos ATLAS PULSE POWER GENERATOR, located in Nevada nuclear weapon test site discharged nearly 19 million amps of current causing symmetrical implosions.
Here is a description of the experiment:

"During an experiment, electromagnetic energy would go sequentially from the generator to the ac-to-dc converter, through the inductor (optional), to the capacitor, and would finally be delivered to the target.

The Atlas capacitor bank would be designed to be flexible enough so that it has the capability to transfer energy in various quantities and within a spectrum of time intervals. The following is a description of what would happen during an experiment requiring maximum possible currents and generating the maximum possible magnetic fields from the facility.

When such an experiment setup was completed, power from the LANL electrical grid would be used to spin the generator to 1,800 revolutions per minute (rpm) over a period of 15 to 20 minutes (the generator may already be spinning for NHMFL experiments). When full speed is reached, a switch would close to allow electricity to flow from the generator to an 80-MW ac-to-dc converter. This converter would transform the high-voltage ac output of the generator to a low-voltage dc charging current in the inductor. The converter would provide this charging current for 3 to 5 seconds. When the peak current of 28 kiloamperes is reached, a switch would disconnect the converter from the inductor. The inductor would produce peak magnetic fields of 40,000 gauss (G) at the coil surface during this few-second interval.

When the inductor reaches 50 MJ of stored energy, various switches would close and open, and energy would be transferred to the capacitor bank, which consists of an array of Marx modules. Within 40 milliseconds, each stage in the Marx modules would acquire a voltage of 60 kilovolts. When the capacitor bank reaches full charge, switches would connect all of the modules into a series configuration, producing many times the original voltage (nominally <1 MV) at the terminals of the transmission line. At this time, the 36 MJ of energy stored in the capacitor bank would be discharged as electric current through the transmission line into a load or liner in the target chamber. The discharge would take approximately 10 ms. If the experiment requires low energy x-ray production, then Atlas may utilize a "plasma flow switch" in the electrical transmission section near the target to decrease the implosion time from several ms down to half a ms or less.

This very large current would produce a large magnetic field in the localized area around the target, causing it to implode, and possibly vaporize or melt, depending on the thickness of the metal. A light liner used inside the target would collide with itself on axis, producing a plasma and low energy x rays. A heavy liner used within the target would compress sample materials to high pressures or, when driven into a central target, would produce extremely high shock pressures that can produce partial material ionization. Solid shrapnel and vaporized molecules would be generated but would be stopped by the walls of the target chamber. Vaporized molecules would deposit onto the walls of the target chamber."

www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/eis/eis0236/vol3/appk.htm

"THE BLACK HOLE ELECTRON

Author: D. Di Mariod.dimario@infinito.itAbstract:

The theory presented in this article introduces new unknown relationships that may shed new light on the nature of matter. This theory allows the calculation of the gravitational constant (G) with a precision comparableto the other atomic constants, gives a direct relation between mass and charge of the electron without the need ofthe ubiquitous "classical electron radius" and generates a second fine structure constant while also offering the disconcerting possibility of an anti-gravitational force.

Keywords: black hole, electron, Planck charge, gravity, quantum physics.

The electron, whether you like it as a well defined shape or as a (more likely) hazy blob of wavelike matter, has not surrendered all of its secrets. The quark structure is a comprehensive description of the possible excited states of matter but has added little to the understanding of the intimate nature of the electron. What we need is a leapforward enabling us to glimpse at the core of this particle and find a viable relationship between what is supposed totake place inside and what is measured outside. This is not as easy as it sounds because the hypothesis putforward here is that the electron itself is a miniature black hole analog. Besides, it would be highly desirable to define the black hole with the Planck time and mass only and have all the electron properties of charge, mass, without introducing any additional parameters. In practice we should be able to define the electron using only the constant of gravitation, Planck's constant, and the speed of light.

PLANCK’S BLACK HOLE

It is not difficult to devise a black hole using some basic constants. The resulting object is rather meaningless until a new interpretation is applied on the nature of the electric force and look at it as a gravitational force changing with time, Planck's time, providing the frame of reference is the black hole itself. A spinning black hole of this kind would originate the electron mass and charge, the fine structure constant, and eventually provide a link between electricity and gravity."

216.109.125.130/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=...D4CF2&icp=1&.intl=us

I would say that there appears to be a generalized concept of Gravitational conditions that exist at all levels between electrical force and the nucleonic center of Gravity. If positive high pressure outward energetics is the directional condition for electrical charge differentials, and the negative vortex is the condition for both matter forward time wave and antimatter reverse time wave that act as mini black holes with phased pulsed photon absorption and generation, then the balance between directions in the Gravitational Force is a condition of the negative vortex. I will address this further in looking at how the Nucleonic Forces which dictates the center of gravity can be manipulated causing levitation.

John

Did Nazi Germany have ongoing research into development of antigravity aircraft? Take a look at a collection of Russian pictures of German Vril and Haunebu antigravity craft photos.







Here is the link to see the entire Russian archive:http://flyers.nm.ru/fdisks_naci.htm

With such advanced propulsion capabilities why did the Nazi's loose the war? Most likely the force fields caused any primitive type projectiles from on board guns to loose accuracy since the propulsion explosives would not carry enough speed to penetrate the extreme warping of aether around the vehicle. Now, if they had particle beam type weapons that penetrated the field at the speed of light all bets would have been off. It was a good thing that they did not have that technology, because if these pictures are for real they certainly were advanced.

John

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by cosmicsurfer</i>
<br />Now I am blowing my mind check these photos out from the Russian Nazi archive of German antigrav ships. This collection of pictures denotes that the manufacturer is BMW. I wonder if the Allied Forces were able to capture this technology? If so we no doubt are way beyond this capability right now.

Here is the BMW Flugelrad:








Well, anyone ever heard of the foo fighters? Imagine a B29 crew seeing an unbelievable saucer shaped craft with Nazi SS insegnias and wondering how on earth they could have developed such technology. What do you think, is this real or did someone have one great time in photo shop? Looks like BMW did more then just build some incredibly great cars......

John
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Here is a description of the Nazi antigravity engine as used in the Vril and Haunebu craft:



The RFZ 3,4, and 6 were all prototypes that grew larger and more powerful in each subsequent model. They were built from 1934-1940. The RFZ-5 was renamed Haunebu in 1939 with the RFZ-7 becoming the Vril-1 Jager in 1941. These highly advanced disc aircraft were overseen by Himmler's SS- specifically, the SS Technical Branch Unit E-IV (Entwicklungsstelle 4) which was created to explore various alternative energies. This unit was tasked with developing both the Haunebu and Vril disc designs that utilized the world's first electro-magnetic-gravitic drive systems: the Vril and Thule Triebwerks.

These drives relied on Hans Coler's free energy Konverter coupled to a Van De Graaf band generator and Marconi vortex dynamo (a huge spherical tank of mercury) to create powerful rotating electromagnetic fields that affected gravity. Many have often inquired "why" then when war started in 1939 did Germany not use these advanced and unique machines in air combat? The simple truth lies in the fact that these machines, despite their superior overall performance to conventional piston-engined aircraft and early jets, could not be realistically adapted to any useful military role other than the most basic transport and recon work.

The strong electromagnetic engines were difficult to control and required a complex celestial navigation system to fly. While maximum speed and range were incredible for the time, the flight characteristics of the discs could not hope to imitate high-performance fighters like the Me Bf 109 or Fw 190. There was very little room for either offensive or defensive armament in these designs except for a few experimental light MG and MK cannons that proved impractical in flight and a rather large experimental Donar (Thunder) Kraftstrahlkanone (Strong Jet Cannon).

These guns tended to destabilize the discs badly and were eventually removed or replaced with lighter automated guns. The disc bodies themselves were not capable of carrying any ordnance at all internally or externally (no bombs, rockets, or missiles) and could make only turns of 22.5, 45, and 90 degrees.

www.dias9.com/ufo81-GERMAN-NAZI.htm#

---

Here is a link to Professor Fran De Aquino website on theoretical basis for gravity control:

"There is a correlation between gravitational mass and inertial mass, which allows the gravity control and reveals a new concept of spacecraft and aerospace flight..."

What is gravitational mass and inertial mass?

A: The physical property of mass has two distinct aspects, gravitational mass (Mg) and inertial mass (M). The gravitational mass produces and responds to gravitational fields. It supplies the mass factors in Newton's famous inverse-square law of Gravitation ( F=GMgMg'/r2). Inertial mass is the mass factor in Newton's 2nd Law of Motion ( F= M.a ).

What is the obtained expression for the correlation between gravitational mass and inertial mass?

A: The general form of the expression is given by the Eq.(41) of the paper Kinetic Quantum Theory Gravity. In the particular case of radiation of any type ( including sonic radiation ) the expression is obtained by substitution of (53) into (41). However, in the case of electromagnetic radiation that expression reduces to Eq.(55). This equation shows that elementary particles, atoms or molecules, can have their gravitational masses reduced, nullified or even made negative by means of absorption or emission of electromagnetic radiation of extreme-low frequency (ELF). In addition, one can easily conclude from the Eq.(58) that the gravity control on bodies with very-high magnetic permeability and/or very-high electric conductivity (superconducting materials) requests radiation with less power density than other materials. In practice, this means that the gravity control on these materials is more easier than on the other. ( The weight, as we know, is given by the product of body's gravitational mass by the acceleration due to the gravity.).

Was the validity of the equation of correlation checked experimentally?

A: Yes. Two different experiments were carried out to check the expression of correlation. Both experiments showed that the experimental results are in agreement with the theoretical predictions.

What happens when the body's gravitational mass is nullified?

A: Theoretically, when the gravitational mass of a body is nullified the body's weight is also nullified. ( Remember that the weight = gravitational mass x acceleration due to the gravity.). Under these circumstances, the body will be totally free of the gravitational action, in any point of the universe. However, the gravitational mass will never be null due to the existence of a minimum value for mg ( quantization of gravitational mass, see p.4). But the experimental results show that it is possible to reduce the weight of specific materials up to 0.000001% of their initial weight.



What happens when the body's gravitational mass is negative?

A: In that case, the body is repulsed from the Earth. The repulsion force will be directly proportional to the gravitational mass of the body.

What is a practical application for this?

A: For example, it will be possible to raise much weighed loads without cranes aid. This will be of fundamental importance to engineering, ports and general transport of loads. It will also be very important to the spacecraft propulsion. It will also be possible to produce mechanical and electric energy in a cheaper way and with less pollution.

How will it be possible to produce electric energy from the control of the gravitational mass?

A: Consider two interconnected spheres by means of a rigid bar, in which center there is an axis which allows the bar to rotate around itself. If the gravitational mass of one of the spheres is made negative, it will weigh "upwards " while the other will weigh "down", consequently the system will rotate around the central axis. We will be then converting gravitational energy ( from the system Earth-spheres) into mechanical energy of rotation. Therefore, it is enough to connect an alternator (broadly available in the market) in order to convert the mechanical energy into electric energy. In this way, it will be possible to supply locally (without the need of transmission lines and distribution networks) the consumption of electric energy so much of the consumer of low consumption as well as the great consumers (more than 1000kVA).

Does this mean then that a person in the most remote area of the planet can have a portable source of electric energy capable of supplying all his needs?

A: Yes. This is the fundamental aspect of the discovery: There won't be monopoly of energy.

Isn't system above mentioned in order to explain the conversion of the gravitational energy into mechanical energy a Motor?

A: Yes. It has been the starting point for the conception of the Gravitational Motor, published in the article: "How to Extract Energy Directly from a Gravitational Field.", where we show that it is possible to build Gravitational Motors with power up to 214HP. Motors of this type would have cost and size similar to the current motors used in our vehicles, so that they can substitute them with advantage. Besides, the Gravitational Motors won't need gasoline or diesel to work (its fuel is the universal gravitational energy ) and practically they don't pollute the atmosphere.

users.elo.com.br/~deaquino//ING.htm

Kinetic Quantum Theory of Gravity

users.elo.com.br/~deaquino//

John

If you are a surfer then of course you would love to own a gravity wave rider. The surfer's dream machine and it appears that even NASA has looked into riding self induced gravity waves:

The Challenge To Create The Space Drive
Marc G. Millis
NASA Glenn Research Center


ABSTRACT

"To travel to our neighboring stars as practically as envisioned by science fiction, breakthroughs in science are required. One of these breakthroughs is to discover a self-contained means of propulsion that requires no propellant. To chart a path toward such a discovery, seven hypothetical space drives are presented to illustrate the specific unsolved challenges and associated research objectives toward this ambition. One research objective is to discover a means to asymmetrically interact with the electromagnetic fluctuations of the vacuum. Another is to develop a physics that describes inertia, gravity, or the properties of spacetime as a function of electromagnetics that leads to using electromagnetic technology for inducing propulsive forces. Another is to determine if negative mass exists or if its properties can be synthesized. An alternative approach that covers the possibility that negative mass might not exist is to develop a formalism of Mach’s Principle or reformulate ether concepts to lay a foundation for addressing reaction forces and conservation of momentum with space drives.

DIAMETRIC DRIVE




This first type of hypothetical field propulsion, as illustrated in Fig. 4, considers the possibility of creating a local gradient by the juxtaposition of diametrically opposed field sources across the vehicle. This is directly analogous to the "negative mass" propulsion suggested by Bondi 12, Winterberg 13 and Forward. 14 The diametric drive can also be considered analogous to creating a pressure source and sink in a space medium as suggested previously with the Induction Sail."

Negative mass propulsion is not a new concept. It has already been shown that is theoretically possible to create a continuously propulsive effect by the juxtaposition of negative and positive mass and that such a scheme does not violate conservation of momentum or energy. A crucial assumption to the success of this concept is that negative mass has negative inertia."

www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/TM-107289.htm

NUCLEONIC GRAVITON BOMBARDMENT, GRAVITY FIELD WAVES, AND DIFFERENTIAL FALL RATES:

".....It is the nucleonic angular momentum or velocity that determines the acceleration of the atom downwards due to the Magnus effect. The total effect is on the entire mass. Thus, two masses of equal weight but different composition can have different nucleonic forces which alter their accelerations."

Boynton's experiment which used the side of a mountain to gravitationally attract the disc horizontally [which would not be affected by the Earth's attraction because that is acting vertically and is counteracted by the supporting wire] would have greater acceleration from the aluminum than the beryllium side and thus a torque would be created to turn the aluminum towards the mountain.

If the force of neutrons is multiplied by .8424633 [p33], it equates with the force of protons and thus the force of both nucleons can be expressed as proton force. It was shown on p33 that since the neutron has 68.4922602% of the angular momentum of the proton, one half of the remaining 31.5073398% negates the other half due to the third vortex around a proton. Even though the effect on emanating waves is negated, it is still there and has to be taken into account when calculating the spin velocity of the average nucleon from which the orbital velocity is calculated. It is the orbital velocity that controls gravity, the ratio of which matches the ratio of dropping times.

The proton force can be thought of as the total spin angular momentum of the proton[even though part of it cannot be measured] which becomes a force through the Magnus equation when it meets resistance. Continuous force becomes gravitational acceleration

When an element's nucleonic force is calculated in terms of proton force per unit mass, it can be expressed by this author's equation:

F = [qN + P]/m

where q is the calculated factor equal to .8424633, N the number of neutrons, P the number of protons and m is the mass in terms of amu or atomic mass units [atomic weight]. If it is to be compared to the ratio of drop times, F must be inversed, as in table 1 [p32 & 33], because a greater force results in less dropping time.

The Orbital Curve of Matter in Motion- A New Cosmic Principle, Found by this Author, to Explain Planetary Spin

With reference to p183 and Sun's rotation p159

Since the Sun's gravitational field, its etheron field and its particle field is accompanied by waves of energy radiating outward through these fields, as well as revolving around with the spinning Sun and because they penetrate to every atom of every planet they cause the planets to orbit the Sun. The Sun revolves faster than the planets in orbit and thus its fields sweep and carry the planets in the direction of its spin.

At this point, an important principle is evoked. The balance between gravitational and centrifugal force maintains a curved orbital path, for the planet, around the Sun. Now, when a planet is forced to travel this curved path a point on the outer side [away from the Sun] is forced to move faster than a point on the inner side because it has a longer orbit to travel in the same time. In the absence of any greater forces in opposition, this causes the planet to spin because the force attempts to make this point revolve around the one on the inside. Of course, the next point in line is subjected to the same force once the spin commences. The amount of force depends upon the diameter of the planet [i.e. the distance between the orbits of the inside and outside surfaces] and thus the difference of their orbital lengths. The smaller the planet, the longer the spin period because there is less force. This is true of the planets in the solar system, from Earth outward, thereby providing evidence for this concept.

The gravitational field of the Sun does not consist of gravitational waves of specific parameters but just simply waves of any description, primarily the finer waves, that emanate from the Sun that create the Magnus effect in the nucleonic structure of the bodies being affected. Because of the inverse square law, there is a greater concentration of waves near the prime source and thus a greater gravitational effect. In nearby bodies such as Mercury and Venus [to a great extent] near the Sun and in the Moon next to the Earth, gravitational force is greater than the spin force and thus the spin is counteracted as gravitational force tries to direct the satellites towards the center of the prime source, against the momentum, like a ball on a tether. From the Earth outward, the spin is less and less affected by the Sun's gravity but the spin force also decreases due to a spreading of the waves. This latter is offset by the outer planets being larger and the arc of their orbit being flatter.

The orbital length of the outer point, on any planet, divided by the orbital length of the inner point is the exact same ratio as the orbital velocity of the outer point divided by the orbital velocity of the inner point. The outer orbit is longer so the outer point moves faster, in orbit, than the inner point. Relative to the planet, the inner and outer points travel at the same velocity but in different solar directions as the planet spins. Part of the inner velocity forwards, along the orbital path, would be canceled by its backward motion.

Let us examine this principle using Earth as an example. The following data is used for Earth from Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia, fifth edition, and from calculations herein with new formula by this author.

Equatorial circumference = 4007516119 cm. Equatorial radius = 637816000 cm.: Equatorial velocity = 46518.96873 cm./s.: Orbital radius = 1.49597870 X 10 to the thirteenth cm.: Orbital period = 31471949 seconds: Rotational period = 23.93 hours [mean sidereal day].

Since the orbital radius is to the Earth's center, the orbital radius to the inner point is this minus one half of the diameter and to the outer point it is this plus one half of the diameter. The orbital radius to the inner point = 1.495914918 X10 to the thirteenth cm. and its circumference is 9.399110633 X 10 to the thirteenth cm. To the outer point it is 1.496042481 X 10 to the thirteenth and its circumference is 9.399912135 X 10 to the thirteenth.

The orbital circumference divided by its orbital period equals its orbital velocity. The outer velocity = 2986758.823 cm./s. The inner velocity = 2986504.14 cm./s. The inner velocity [relative to the Earth]is 2986504.14 cm./s minus 46518.96873 cm./s [Earth's present average velocity of rotation backward along the orbit] which is 2939985.171 cm./s. The difference beween the two is 46773.652 cm./s which is the surplus of the outer, that is greater than the inner, after the two are equalized by Earth. This surplus goes into the rotation of the planet. By dividing the Earth's circumference by this surplus we obtain the Earth's rotational period, the result of which is 85678.9228 seconds. This equals 23.8 hours. Since we are now seeing this from the orbital point of view, we compare this to the mean sidereal day, or one revolution, of 23.93 hours. This difference of only 7.8 minutes is small. However, there is another force involved. These calculations were applied to an isolated Earth, in the absence of other forces, which means before the moon was captured by the Earth, passing close to it, while they both were in orbit in the same direction around the sun [p.159 within the section titled "The Origin of the Solar system" p.147] For a period after capture, it would only affect the Earth periodically as it came close in its orbit and then went way out. It would not much affect the slowing of Earth's rotation until it settled into a more circular orbit. Astronomers calculate that the gravitational effect of the moon is increasing the Earth's rotational period by 1.5 milliseconds per century. The 7.8 minutes, above, can be accounted for by the moon if it finally reached this more circular orbit by about 30 million years ago. This is one half of the time since the extinction of the dinosaurs which would have occurred during the first close encounters. The more circular orbit at 30 million years ago seems reasonable. On p156 it is mentioned that Dr.Ovenden, head of the Astronomy Dept. at U.B.C. Vancouver, Canada, with the help of a computer, had determined that the area now occupied by the asteroid belt had contained matter 90 times the mass of the Earth that suddenly disappeared 16 million years ago. This was undoubtably captured by Jupiter as described. The oldest rocks on Earth are three billion years old. If the planets took this long to form in the standing wave nodes before clearing the area between them so that they could move to balance gravity and centrifugal force and thus capture moons etc., then it is not improbable that the Earth captured our moon 60 to 70 million years ago as described, along with the evidence thereof, and which would have occurred a little earlier in time. This close correlation establishes this new Cosmic principle.

Contrary to Einstein's theory, it is not space that is curved but only the paths, within space, of particles or bodies that are forced to follow them by the combination of gravitational and centrifugal forces.

In summation,when viewed from above, a planet will curve to the left when orbiting in the direction of the sun's rotation. This causes a spin of the planet of a like rotation as outlined and proven by using orbital data to calculate the spin of the Earth. However, if a planet or particle is caused to spin, such as by collision, a reverse orbit would occur with the arc curving to the right in the absence of other forces. If there is still a gravitational force emanating from a focal point, the object would either orbit in the reverse direction [as some planetary satellites] or else counteract some of the gravitational force thus changing the orbital radius or else tilting the planet's spin axis [as that of Uranus]. In the case of particles in a cloud chamber, their spiral, or corkscrew, path is explained by this principle.

Spin Curvature - A new name, herein , for the new Cosmic Principle

The laws of the macrocosm can again be demonstrated to apply to the microcosm. In the process Spin Curvature can again be established.

For example, let us examine a group of etherons, the medium of the Universe, which form the lowest energy electromagnetic particle by making up the first vortex particle capable of emitting field waves. This particle is known to be part of what is called background radiation with a measured energy of 2.73K. It was called the 3K or 2.73K particle. It is called herein the kaytron. From this energy it was calculated [p.10] that its wavelength is .177 cm., at the bottom of the infrared spectrum, and its energy in terms of ergs equals 1.122303723 X 10 to the minus fifteenth ergs. h [Planck's constant] used in these calculations = 6.626176 X 10 to the minus twenty seventh erg seconds. Velocity, from E = hv/wavelength equals 2.997925 X 10 to the tenth cm./s. which is light speed as measured on Earth. Its mass can also be calculated. On page 6, the mass of the etheron was derived to be 7.372615 X 10 to the -48th gms. Since energies are proportionate to masses, if kaytron energy is divided by 6.626176 X 10 to the -27th ergs, which is the energy of an etheron close to absolute zero, and made equal to the kaytron mass divided by the etheron mass, it is found that the mass of the kaytron is 1.2487313 X 10 to the -36 gms. This can also be verified by E = MCsquared, the conversion equation for matter at rest or at light speed. Its radius can also be calculated. 1.2487313 X 10 to the -36 gms.[kaytron] / 7.372615 X 10 to the -48 gms. [etheron] = .1693743 X 10 to the 12th = the number of etherons in a kaytron. Etheron radius [p7] = 9.983 X 10 to the -23rd cm. The volume of the etheron = [9.983 X 10 to the -23]cubed X 4/3pi =4167.463671 X 10 to the -69th cubed. The volume of the kaytron = 4167.463671 X 10 to the -69th X .1693743 X 10 to the 12th = 7.058612421 X 10 to the -55 cm.cubed. When divided by 4/3pi rcubed = 1.68.5119587 X10 to the -57th. r for the kaytron = 5.52344765 X 10 to the -19 cm. which is over 1100 times smaller than that of the electron.

Since the kaytron has a wavelength of .177 cm. and travels in a spiral or coiled path, as do all particles, with this wavelength being the measure between adjacent points on the coil,after once around the coil, the wave has an amplitude. The wave energy is known to be proportionate to the amplitude squared. A table was found on the internet which gives five examples of energy and the corresponding squares of the amplitudes found by them as follows shown by the numerical values.:

Energy - - - - - - - - - - Amplitude Squared

2099.66 - - - - - - - - - - - 100

8441.44 - - - - - - - - - - - 400

19058 - - - - - - - - - - - - 900

33727.2 - - - - - - - - - - - 1600

76101.9 - - - - - - - - - - - 3600

If the energy is divided by the amplitude squared, the five examples have an average ratio of 21.1. If the energy [ergs] of a kaytron is divided by 21.1, this = the amplitude squared which = 5.31897 X 10 to the -17th. The wave amplitude is thus 7.2931269 X 10 to the-9th cm. The direct circumference of this amplitude = 2piA = 4.5824068458 X 10 to the -8th cm. When the wavelength , .177 cm., is added to this, the total length of travel over the spiral wavelength = .1770000458 cm.. Propagation through space near Earth is 2.997925 X 10 to the 10th cm./s. If this is divided into .177 cm. the period is obtained which = 5.09040836579 X 10 to the -12th. The spiral wavelength velocity = C/P = 3.47712861289333 X 10 to the 10th cm./s. The spin curvature principle can now be applied.

The radius of the innermost point = 7.2931269 X 10 to the -9th [A] - 5.5234479 X10 to the -19th cm. = 7.2931268994 X 10 to the -9th cm. Its circumference = 4.5284067778 X 10 to the -8th cm. + .1770000458 cm. When divided by P, V = 34771295130.9749 cm./s. After subtracting the retrograde spin velocity of 2.997925 X 10 to the 10th cm/s, its velocity along its orbit is 4.7920361289333 X 10 to the -9th cm./s. The radius of the outermost point = 7.2931269 cm. + 5.5234479 X 10 to the -19th = 7.2931269006 X 10 to the -9th cm. The circumference = 4.5824067785 X 10 to the -8th cm. After adding .1770000458 it equals .1770000916 cm. After dividing by P, it equals V which = 34771295130.9749 cm./s. The outer V - the inner V =2.99792590020416 X 10 to the 10th cm./s which is the surplus velocity that goes into spin. Though the inner and outer radii and circumferences are different, the calculator couldn't handle any difference in velocities but the calculations show that the surplus outer velocity was essentially that of light speed for the spin of the kaytron, equal to that of propagation speed or showing that kinetic and potential energies are equal as outlined herein. We are not attempting to determine the rotation rate from the surplus velocity of the outer point since we need to know this before determining the surplus. We are verifying the rotation rate with the orbital data to show that orbital curvature is responsible for the rotation rate or possibly, in some cases, it is vice versa."

www.spacetelescopes.com/additions.html


LEVITATION:

Levitation is rising, rather than falling, of objects, the opposite of gravitation. It has been shown that gravitation is due to the spin of nucleons. If they spin in the opposite direction, with respect to the Earth, levitation will occur. Electrons, when they reach a nucleon after going through the electron barrier in an atom, can, at the right frequency, reverse the spin axis of the nucleon. If over fifty per cent of the nucleons in the object are reversed, the object will levitate away from the Earth's surface. If it is less than fifty per cent, the object merely loses weight."

The following movie demonstrates the loss of weight of an object on a balance scale. A plastic case containing brass screws rises when the switch is on and falls when it is shut off. It will repeat as many times as the switch is turned on and off and instantly reacts. The second picture shows a block of wood doing the same thing. These are placed close to the electron source while the opposite side of the scale is further away and any effect on it is minimized by the inverse square law. This, of course, goes down when the target goes up. Note that the two pointers are even when balanced and when the target gets lighter its pointer goes up while its opposite goes down. This reverses when the switch is shut off and they come to balance again.[They can be seen on each side of the center scale]

This is all done without the solid state power supply, special coil and other equipment needed to lift heavier weights. The only power used was for a small two and one half inch diameter electric motor. The electron generator in this demonstration is not powerful enough to drive the electrons farther than just shallow penetration, but it is enough to show that levitation can be accomplished on demand which is necessary to be able to harness it. Once equipment is used to drive the electrons further so that they penetrate deeply enough into the atom, weight will have no limit since the force comes from the angular momentum of the nucleon, itself, [just as gravitation causes objects to drive themselves down] and so the more weight, the more nucleons there are and thus the more force to lift the extra weight, a minute fraction of which is enough to maintain the spin orientation of the nucleon.

The third picture shows the same 2X2 wood block on a different scale. It goes up and towards the electron source. It stops about 1/2 inch or so after rising because it is as close to the source as it can get. In the first picture, it stopped because that was the limit of the scale. In case someone thinks that the electrons are driving the electrons in the wood to the opposite side leaving protons [positive] which try to move towards the source, it should be remembered that it is electrons that move towards protons [which are called holes], not vice versa. Electrons should repel the electrons in the atoms of the wood but these are attached to protons in the nucleus of the atom by standing waves and thus the whole block of wood should be repelled by the electrons from the source. Electrons do dislodge atoms from the surface of material. The only way that electrons from the source can cause material to move towards the source is through the Magnus effect, described under gravitation, which must overcome the repulsion effect by electrons. When sufficient force is applied to reach over 50% of the nucleons in an atom and thus over 50% of the atoms in the material, that is when the atoms in the material can continue to levitate the whole material at once towards the electron source. If the source stays ahead of the motion by being attached, the motion is continuous.

It is not the source attracting the target. It is the nucleon in the target that is pushing itself in the direction of the source due to the Magnus effect of the independent electrons from the source. A baseball pitcher is not applying force to curve a baseball. The ball is curving its own path by spinning and forcing the air molecules to go to one side like that of an airplane wing lifting because the stream of air, forced over the wing, causes a lower pressure than that underneath [Bernoulli equation]. Attraction of one particle to another is not a drawing of it towards it. If the other is not spinning, firing smaller particles at it [as is the common theory] would not draw it. It would repel it. If spinning, the Magnus effect takes place as described herein. These references to the attraction due to the Magnus effect do not apply to those particles that attract due to the standing waves set up between them because they have the same wavelength and frequency or the harmonics thereof.

LEVITATION VIDEO:

www.spacetelescopes.com/melclip1.avi

www.spacetelescopes.com/melclip2.avi

www.spacetelescopes.com/melclip3.avi

Side note: Mel Winfield helped John Hutchison create the famous experiments that led to the Hutchison Effect.

John

If Mel Winfield is correct in regards to electromagnetic field states of the proton having a direct relationship to the directional force of gravity, then the question might be asked as to how the proton works regarding spin in the first place and further what are the actual spin dynamics or changes in the proton electromagnetic field geometries that create repulsive states?

Here is the latest information regarding the internal workings of the proton:

"The Electron-Proton Storage Ring HERA started operations in 1992. It collides electrons of 27.6 GeV (1 GeV = 1.000.000.000 electron volts) with protons of 920 GeV. It provides a resolution which is more than ten times better than that achieved by the best experiments at CERN and FNAL.

Now let us take a closer look at the proton. The gluon-strings between the quarks inside the proton can break and at the ends quarks and antiquarks appear. One has therefore to expect a dynamical mixture of quarks, antiquarks and gluons, in contrast to just three quarks of the naive proton model.

The measurements at HERA provide such a close up picture. They show that the number of quark-antiquarks pairs inside the proton is unexpectedly large. The figure shows the new measurements together with old measurements at lower energy. The variable x is a measure of the energy of the quark inside the proton. The HERA measurements are a probe of the quarks and antiquarks inside the proton at small x-values. Their number rises fast as one goes to small x-values. This was a great surprise, since the old measurements had not hinted at such a behavior.



The proton, according to HERA measurements: It is densely filled with quarks, antiquarks and gluons."

www.desy.de/f/hera/engl/chap2.html

The HERA results are from extreme energy collisions of electrons with protons producing streams of quarks and antiquarks. Obviously, the electromagnetic fields of the protons are shattered during such an experiment, and thus we might be looking at a window into the modulation process itself that unpacks higher frequencies from two succinct time domains that are interconnected by a twisting string of two way gluon light fields as a generalized signature of the larger universe hyperdimensional spin dynamics. In the matter universe most likely the quarks would dominate and be in synchronous spin with the graviton flux fields that penetrate to the center of gravity. So, if Mel is correct that spin might be reversed to redirect gravity, then what we may be seeing is the normal patterns of dominance of forward time quarks change under a redirection of the geometry of the electromagnetic fields creating a greater frequency stream of modulation of the reverse time antiquarks within the proton.

Before we get too carried away in our speculations let’s take a look at the standard model of atomic polarity and charge that is our present basis for atomic interactions; however, the standard model does not explain higher dimensional interactions that are responsible for the condensation of matter in the first place within this dimension, and the relationship of these frequencies in regards to actual release of thermodynamic flows of electromagnetic energies due to the changes in the geometries of electromagnetic fields that surround all matter:


STANDARD DEFINITION BALANCE OF CHARGE:

"Atoms, the smallest particles of matter, are made of protons, electrons, and neutrons. Protons have a positive charge, Electrons have a negative charge that cancels the proton's positive charge. Neutrons are particles that are similar to a proton but have a neutral charge. There are no differences between positive and negative charges except that particles with the same charge repel each other and particles with opposite charge attract each other. If a solitary positive proton and negative electron are placed near each other they will come together to form a hydrogen atom. This repulsion and attraction (force between stationary charged particles) is known as Electrostatic Force and extends theoretically to infinity, but is diluted with distance.

Both atoms and the universe have a neutral charge overall and come with the same number of protons and electrons. When an atom has one or more missing electrons it is left with a positive charge, and when an atom has at least one extra electron it has a negative charge. Having a positive or a negative charge makes an atom an ion. Atoms only gain and lose protons and neutrons through fusion, fission, and being radioactive. Although atoms are made of many particles and objects are made of many atoms, they behave similar to charged particles in terms of how they repel and attract.

In an atom the protons and neutrons combine to form a tightly bound nucleus. This nucleus is surrounded by a vast cloud of electrons circling it at great distance held near the protons by electromagnetic attraction. The cloud exists as a series of overlapping shells / bands in which the inner valence bands are filled with electrons and are tightly bound to the atom. The outer conduction bands contain no electrons except those that have accelerated to the conduction bands by gaining energy. With enough energy an electron will escape an atom. When an electron in the conduction band decelerates and falls to another conduction band or the valence band emitting an photon, is known as the photoelectric effect."

en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Physics_in_English:Charge

Now let's take a look at an interpretation of Ampere's 1825 laws that explain the phase dynamics of electromagnetic spin of waves in creating harmonic balance as an alternative to positive and negative charge:

(A review)Ampere's 1824 Laws

By Daniel Fitzpatrick

Abstract

“These relative motion laws greatly simply all of science:
These laws are essentially Ampere's simple 1824 long wire laws with a frequency modification. .These are universal laws that unify all the forces by seeing all forces as space-time creations similar to the way it's done in general relativity. . These laws, though, visualize different space-time intervals (different gauges) being created at various different spin/orbit frequencies.
Despite the fact that quantum theory does not see our type of spin causing angular momentum in the microcosm, these laws show it is there nevertheless but at a different space-time interval (different gauge - - different spin/orbit frequency level).

The "A" Laws

[The reason these "A" Laws work relates to the superposition principle that there is no repulsive force with in phase waves but a repulsive force (space) is always generated by out of phase waves].

You must also understand Dr. Milo Wolff's concept that particles (and time) are manufactured by scalar, standing wave, resonances with an immense, finite number of similar surrounding entities (Mach's principle).

Force (space) exists not DIRECTLY via scalar resonances but because of individual vector spin and orbital resonances between two similar scalar standing wave entities.
It is from the abovementioned scalar, standing wave entity, spin/orbital resonances that we derive these "A" Laws.

Remember, these "A" Laws (Ampere or Aufbau) have unified ALL the forces so these are now the NEW laws for everything, from the smallest spinning particle to the largest spinning super cluster of galaxies even where high relativistic speeds and mass are encountered.

* The 1st. "A" Law shows us where all objects in relative motion produce the least space-time between themselves:
The space time interval is created the least between any two objects, the closest sides of which "see" themselves spinning or moving on parallel paths in the same direction at the same frequency (like gears meshing) or a close harmonic thereof. You can also say these two objects will attract each other.

* The 2nd. "A" Law shows us where all objects in relative motion produce the most space-time between themselves:
Both space and time are created the most between any two objects, the closest sides of which "see" themselves spinning or moving on parallel paths in opposite directions at the same frequency (like gears clashing) or a close harmonic thereof. You can also say these two objects will repel each other.

I use the quoted word "see" to emphasize the particular spacetime realm in which these entities actually find themselves although this will NOT be the way it is seen from our particular spacetime reference frame realm.

Of great importance, in the two preceding laws, is that these laws are frequency laws and they work separately for each separate spin/orbit frequency level which means these individual wave-particles must "see" themselves doing these things from their viewpoint in their local gauge environment. It does not matter how some other spin/orbit frequency level views these things because space and time and indeed the average space time interval is entirely different for each different spin/orbit frequency level (gauge).

These two laws look equal and opposite but they are not: The 1st "A" law "locks on" while its opposite 2nd sister law never does. This is because the total force is generally centralized and you can feel this 1st "A" law "lock on" when two magnets come together. These two laws result in limits of aggregation being established all throughout this universe: This is why there are limits to the size of atoms and limits to the size of stars as well.

* The Aufbau or Ampere Corollary.

The aforementioned forces, or space-time intervals, between two objects will vary proportionally with the cosine of the angle of their paths. And they will have a torque that will tend to make the paths parallel and to become oriented so that objects on both paths will be traveling in the same direction.

Or

All objects that "see" themselves traveling in the same direction on parallel paths at the same frequency will attract and/or space and time, at that frequency, between them is created the least.
All objects that "see" themselves traveling in opposite directions on parallel paths at the same frequency will repel and/or space and time between them, at that frequency, increases or is created the most.

And please don't forget this: Why electrons, stars & galaxies repel each other. Remember, we have completely chucked out all those invisible forces you are familiar with and all we have now are these two "A" Laws.

Please remember, in this new "big picture" of everything, ALL FORCES ARE NOW UNIFIED so there are no such things as gravity, magnetic lines of force or plus and minus charges or for that matter even the strong force.

Please pay particular attention to the following.

Electrons can exhibit either an attraction or repulsion when they are "locked" spin up or spin down on orbitals such as like or unlike charges; like or unlike poles OR they may even display a gyroscopic type repulsive behavior when they are "free". Our "A" Laws show us why this is so and in the next 8 paragraphs you have the best explanation of why electrons and even stars & galaxies repel each other.

Lets look at these free electrons first: They spin and hence they have inertial qualities and this includes gyroscopic inertia which always provides this force 90 degrees to any external force acting on such a spinning item.

Completely forget about charge now and only look at our new "A" Laws and what they say. The 1st "A" Law tells us that there is a possibility that two free electrons can attract each other providing that any portion of their closest sides are spinning in the same direction at the same frequency. This means either their sides can be spinning in the same directions or they can be lined up so that both of their poles can be spinning in the same directions: Any such two electrons will attract each other (magnetism also sigma and pi bonding).
Then we see that there is something else: This torque twisting force - on BOTH free items - depends on the cosine of the angle of their respective spin planes.

As this force begins to act, it in turn causes this 90-degree gyroscopic torque to twist both of those totally free electrons away from this initial attracting position, doesn't it?
So because of this gyro torque, two free electrons can never remain in a full attracting position and they will therefore be forced to stay more in a repelling position. Therefore free electrons will always end up repelling each other and this repelling is not explained by using this thing called charge: it is explained only by simply using global inertial qualities and our new global "A" Laws.

The above 8 paragraphs explain not only why electrons repel each other but they also explain why any two perfectly free similar spinning objects of the same size must repel each other. So now you know why both electrons and galaxies stay well away from each other.
This is Einstein's cosmological constant.

Something somewhere has to be "locked" in place and synchronized in frequency (such as the electron's spin with another electron's spin) or a close subharmonic to get any kind of attracting force:
Yes, the proton attracts an electron but instead of charge please see it this way:

When two up quarks combine with one down quark to form a proton then the two up quarks are able to synchronize in with the electron's spin frequency and "lock" two electrons thereby preventing these electrons from precessing or wobbling and therefore the up quarks can attract the electrons.

This is why aggregations come together (gravity) and larger aggregations come together and accumulate because as these things grow in size there are more things "locked" in place strengthening the attractive force of the 1st "A" Law.

Once we knew about quarks then we should have realized how those two 'up quarks' in the proton are set up spin up-spin down (The 'up quark' does not signify orientation). Those two spin up--spin down 'up quarks' are spinning - in the same equatorial plane - at a higher frequency but all 'up quarks' spin at a harmonic of the electron's spin frequency allowing a spin up and spin down electron to be attracted to them in the same equatorial plane. We will soon know even more about the attractive quark strong force binding functions. Attraction is always a synchronized frequency attraction and it is not simply the old idea of plus and minus charges.
All attractions in this theory must be synchronized frequency attractions. Both light and inertial mass are caused by these synchronized frequency attractions.

As quantum theory shows us, the orbital of an electron on a distant star goes down a certain amount while the orbital of the electron receiving this quantum of energy---in your eye---goes up the exact same amount. But what quantum mechanics does not tell you is that these two energy-exchanging orbitals must be in the same exact plane. Not only that but each orbital must be a mirror image of the other with the electrons in each rotating and revolving in the exact opposite directions so that at the time the energy exchange takes place the closest sides of both electrons are going in the same direction. You can see from this that this energy change is merely a MOMENTARY DIRECT PULL from the electron, on the star, to the electron in your eye. These electrons will make many revolutions, rotations and wobbling oscillations during each change of those orbitals giving you the light that you see.
If two distant quarks are lined up so that their closest sides are in the same directions as the two aforementioned electrons then they too will momentarily bind with each other---even from a vast distance---and cause what we see as inertial mass. But since the quarks in the proton and neutron tri-quark entities do not oscillate and wobble quite like the electron then this pull of the two quarks is a steady momentary binding pull where BOTH quarks are pulled away from the other two quarks but NO PERMANENT Energy CHANGE is made in either tri-quark entity (neutron or proton).
When you spin a flywheel and notice the gyroscopic inertia, you should also notice that the gyroscopic torque that is always 90 degrees to the axis of rotation can also be seen as a linkage with the rim of the rapidly spinning flywheel to a path projected in the sky (macrocosm surroundings). The rim tries to stay in this path. This is showing you that you do have an absolute reference frame, which is Mach's principle. Billions of quarks in BOTH the flywheel and in the macrocosm are both being momentarily extended more than normal thus giving you this added gyroscopic inertia.

You might have to read the long TOE at www.rbduncan.com/TOEbyFitzpatrick.htm to get the full picture of what happens when you crank up a gyroscope or a flywheel or ride a bicycle and produce gyroscopic inertia. It's similar to the reason you need cyclic pitch on a helicopter. When a helicopter moves forward then the blades on one side travel through the air faster than the blades on the other side and this tries to tip the helicopter over. (Igor Sikorsky had to invent cyclic pitch to prevent this).

The same thing happens to certain quarks whose rims line up with the rim of the gyroscope, flywheel or bicycle wheels. The speed that these items are turning---in respect to the macrocosm---now adds to portions of the quark rim speed which before was close to the speed of light and now gets even closer to the speed of light (becoming more massive hence at a higher frequency). So you are moving up an asymptotic curve close to that unsurpassable speed of c. And this---even with a miniscule number of quarks involved---gives us this gyroscopic inertia. It does this because the mass of these few quarks increase tremendously as portions of their rim speed approach the speed of light. As Einstein has shown us, mass increases with speed and especially increases when on that asymptotic portion of the curve.

Of available electrons, only the smallest fraction link with others a distance away to transfer light and heat. The same with the spinning quark that causes gyroscopic inertia. All spinning quarks link to cause inertial mass. All these binding linkages are momentary with the electron's oscillations causing a permanent transfer of energy and the various momentary quark bindings causing inertial mass. This could be seen---in gyroscopic inertia---as only a temporary transfer of inertial mass. But if you could increase our surroundings---as will be the case when our Milky Way galaxy finally collides with the Andromeda galaxy---then anyone here on earth will find both inertial mass, gyroscopic inertia and centrifugal force have all become stronger with the more crowded surroundings.

Now let's go to the stars and you will see the same "A" Laws apply there as well and, as you can see, these too will always have to remain in a repelling position with each other.

Close stars, especially close binary stars, will NEVER be spinning so that their closest sides are moving in the same direction at the same frequency.

Recently Perlmutter discovered this acceleration and showed we must have Einstein's cosmological constant---a repulsive force---between all the stars and galaxies.

If you think Perlmutter is wrong then why do we have Einstein's Principle of Equivalence?

Why is the earth's gravity the same as an acceleration?

Present science doesn't answer that but the only possible answer, my friend, is that space-time is being created MORE in the surroundings than it is between you and the earth thereby pushing you toward the earth.

And if gravity can not be discerned from an accelerating contraction (Principle of Equivalence) then that repulsive force in all the surroundings can not be discerned from an accelerating expansion either.

Scientists have been recently wracking their brains to figure out why we have Perlmutter's acceleration because nothing in our present science has even predicted such a thing.

But read those preceding blue sentences again! Now I hope you can finally see that our "A" Laws tell you exactly why we have Einstein's "cosmological constant" not only in the sky but in the microcosm as well. And they tell you why we have gravity too. Your present science doesn't even do this.

The reason these "A" Laws work is that this universe is built on an extraordinarily simple principle via an endless supply of vector wave resonances producing lower frequency spherical standing wave, scalar wave resonances that, in turn, produce space-time by spinning, orbiting and precessing.

A minimum of space (at that particular frequency) is produced between vector waves that are in phase.

This leads, in turn, to production of the most important vector forces between the closest sides of such spinning spherical resonances and in the direction of the axis of each spin. There are also vector forces via orbits and spin and orbital and spin precessions.

This universe equalizes the energy vector force input to vector force output of these scalar wave resonances by balancing them on specific spin and orbital geodesics.

These vector forces, in turn, combine to produce lower frequency, hence lower energy, scalar resonances, which in turn, spin, precess and orbit producing still lower frequency space-time and its related vector forces and this goes on and on: Thus is our universe built from the microcosm to the macrocosm and may continue indefinitely because higher frequency waves would always be producing lower frequency, lower energy scalar wave resonances and they, in turn, would be producing even lower energy, lower frequency resonances.

This seems to be an infinite frequency universe with each spin/orbit frequency having inertial and gyroscopic qualities but yet with each spin/orbit frequency having its own distinct symmetry laws.”

www.rbduncan.com/Ampere

Now Ampere’s laws appear to unite all forces to the harmonics of spin and frequency that are in phase attract each other (laws of super resonance) while out of phase harmonics repels (laws of super dissonance).

So, the picture certainly gets more complex regarding just how geometries of electromagnetic fields may cause changes in the overall forces of nature that are modulated from higher dimensional time domains. This higher dimensional interaction makes for greater amounts of information to be compacted into tight strings of extreme frequencies that may enable all sorts of break throughs in FTL technological innovations in the future. Just how time domains interact can be glimpsed in the bizarre experiments by John Hutchison:

Levitation of water:



Cold welds of dissimilar materials



www.americanantigravity.com/hutchison.shtml

In conclusion, the explanation by Mel Winfield that the proton reverse spin causes repulsion within gravity field may be accurate in regards to the antiquark becoming the dominant force in maintaining a new field geometry that is out of phase and in dissonance to the relativity of earth’s electromagnetic forces.
UFO technology, Science, or is it Science Fiction?:



” Pulsating electromagnetic shield against incoming missiles, asteroids or even bullets - reverse engineered from extraterrestrial UFOs”

What makes the extraterrestrial UFOs invincible to any incoming projectiles is the shield of electromagnetic waves that surrounds them. It is now being reverse engineered to form advanced shields against incoming missiles, asteroids and comets.

The electromagnetic stealth is created with the application of very high intensity electromagnetic flux or change of intensity with respect to that of the earth. The amount of energy used can produced amplified effects creating an invisible but very effective barrier to incoming projectiles in a trajectory from the space.
What is most astonishing is that the electromagnetic shields used by the extraterrestrial can deflect the incoming projectiles back towards the source. That is the reason why fighter pilots all over the world as well as infantry divisions are instructed not to fire towards an extraterrestrial UFO.

The technology that makes it possible to defect the incoming projectile is fascinating. The pulsating beamed energy creates an envelope of dynamic energy levels that creates an environment similar to a cushion. When a ball or object hits the cushion, it is deflected back. Similarly the incoming projectiles are deflected back.

An interesting theory shows the incoming projectile can be thrown back to the source even if the trajectory is made to change path several times in its path. The spatial geometry of higher dimensions mapped into the physical universe can actually map the trajectory path of the projectile if the time dimension can be moved back. The reverse path then can be mapped to time in the future. This makes it possible to guide the trajectory back to the source with devastating effects.

According to defense scientists involved in reverse engineering technologies from the extraterrestrial UFOs, the incoming projectile can be given a complete one hundred eighty degrees of turning before thrown back into the spatial path it took to come.
Unlike popular belief that electromagnetic shields can fry incoming projectiles, it can only deflect. The deflection becomes deadly once the object is thrown back to the source.

Copyright © 2004-2005, Indiadaily.com. All Rights Reserved.

www.indiadaily.com/editorial/3699.asp

Next we will look at the INTALEK PAPERS.