Infinite Space and Time...How?

mechanic,

Just how old do you think Jereme is? ha


Mac

Jereme,

In the "No Time" view your aging is a process involving energy transfers and their particular effect on the body system. Every motion of sub-atomic particles via energy flowing and changing energy events forming a "Dynamic Present" in "Static Time" or an "Energy Dependant" universe.

This energy field creates spatial dimension. The energy flow, produces gravity via attenuation and affects distance between objects.


Mac

Dummy,

I just came from the web and there were over 2,200 Chiral Condensate site. Most of them don't discuss the energy density and some that appeared that they might, require you to purchase in information of be an autorized viewer from an institution.

I narrowed my search by adding energy density to the end and one popped up wich gave some useful information.


GET THIS: Pvac = 10E129 ergs/cm^3.

Anybody for free energy? Every cm^3 of the universe contains 10E129 ergs where we thought there was nothing but "Void and Vacuum".!



Mac


Mac

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
Perhaps you should look at the definition of eternal:
"Being without beginning or end; <u>existing outside of time</u>".
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

Without beginning or end ... sounds like infinity to me. As for existing outside of time I don't see how one can apply a spatial concept OUTSIDE to a temporal concept. Dictionary definitions don't always make coherent sense. Most people use "eternal" to mean "forever lasting", that is the sense in which I took it.

For those that may not be familiar with the unit of "erg", the above condensate energy density is equal to 100 million billion horsepower per cubic inch.

That is every cubic inch of the universe packs that magnitude of energy, including those love handles you've grown used to.

Think about that. I do not accept the term "Infinity" as having any physical reality but this is probably close enough to be so treated.


Mac

Jereme,

I agree with your interpretation of "Eternal". I think some my differences with MM is the definition of "Universe". My interpretation is all that links to our physics. In that respect I view the universe as a bubble (perhaps expanding, perhaps not) that flowed from the Chiral Condensate (another dimension apparently) like a rip in the klien bottle of creation.

Tom's view seems to include the Chiral Condensate as part of our universe. So when I speak of finite I am not referring to all creation but only the bubble that we live in which is 3D - for the moment discount time as a 4th. I believe it is an integral part of the 3D's.


Mac