Einstein's Starting Point

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rodschmidt</i>
<br />Einstein's starting point was to ask: What if you could follow a light wave at its speed? What would you see?

His answer was that you would see a dipole hanging motionless in space, which is a violation of Maxwell's laws. He therefore concluded that you cannot follow a light wave at its speed, and begat SR.

If SR is wrong and LR is right, then where in this chain of reasoning did Einstein go wrong?

Or to put it another way: what is LR's answer to Einstein's starting question?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Warren writes again:
I almost forgot. This may help you understand the starting point I am
talking about.

webpages.charter.net/pubmaster/PSRPub.PDF

Enjoy! Warren

The only option if man is going to reach the Stars in a lifetime is to master both Space and Time. Warp Technology today!

Michiel, I found a great site on PCM with brilliant graphics and animations.



Here is the site:

www.futureworld.dk/tech/ether/phasecon/phasecon.htm

I now think that the very processes of life itself depend upon PCM interactions for constructing biological systems. If you look at the complex neurological systems in the chordates you see an example of PCM structures such as the homunculi focal points on the neo cortex that are reversed in the decussation of nerve tracts to the other side of the body. Also, the occipital lobe is reversed in controlling the optic system. I will discuss this further as a universal concept in how time waves interact over on the "Antigravity Research" message log. I think we have discovered a generalized concept on how nature assembles itself, i.e., similarities between the motion of waves in biological systems and atomic structures as a function of the general motion of time waves in nature.


Fibonacci Vortical Structure in forward time

John

Thanks for the link, John. I already visited the site, but only after you brought up the subject of phase conjugation

Life using PCM-interactions is possible, I think. If there is any benefit in using the interactions, then i'm sure that life has made the best of it. And, as always, then we could learn a lot about PCM-effects by studying how life deals with the phenomenon.

___

Here's another angle on Einstein's starting point.

126kB picture of gravitational lensing:
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f1/A...nsing.arp.750pix.jpg

The same picture again but this one is 49 MegaByte !!! Very nice if you want to use filtering.
imgsrc.hubblesite.org/hu/db/2003/01/imag...formats/full_tif.tif

These photons get a free ride in a roller-coaster, by the looks of it. What would the photon see? (If it wasn't just screaming with its eyes closed.) They also have a choice which route to take from A to B.

That last part reminded me of the 'double slit experiment'. Light falling through two slits creating an interference pattern on a screen, even if this light consists of single photons at a time. The thing is that photons of a different wavelength show a different pattern. So the way a photon perceives the universe depends on its wavelength.

Has anyone seen this?
Comments?

oops [)]
www.relativitychallenge.com/mistakes.htm