Postulate: Round Craters are Not From Asteroids

i think the asteroids do cause round or near round craters, and btw, i think your statement was flawed from the very beginning. You say round craters or near round craters aren't formed by asteroids and meteors to start out with, claiming that asteroids can't be going at an oblique angle, then make a sharp turn and decide to hit the planet head on, but that point right there is irrelevant. You see, asteroids and meteors CAN hit the surface of a planet or moon head on. You've been arguing the wrong thing the whole time, i think. Looking at your original statement, it doesn't matter whether an asteroid or meteor can cause gashes into a surface or not. I would look back onto that if i were you and maybe reword what you're trying to argue? That's just what it looks like to me, please correct me if i'm wrong.

From Mac,
"WoW! Paranoid and a pessimist too"

I told you once before to stop analysing me instead if the info, *******.
Im not your standing joke, you got it this time?
This is the last time Im gonna be nice.

Meta

Mac,

Use your analitical skills to analyse this to find something wrong with it:

www.catastrophism.com/texts/electricity-in-space/

Meta

Meta, what are you just ignoring me? i think the asteroids do cause round or near round craters, and btw, i think your statement was flawed from the very beginning. You say round craters or near round craters aren't formed by asteroids and meteors to start out with, claiming that asteroids can't be going at an oblique angle, then make a sharp turn and decide to hit the planet head on, but that point right there is irrelevant. You see, asteroids and meteors CAN hit the surface of a planet or moon head on. You've been arguing the wrong thing the whole time, i think. Looking at your original statement, it doesn't matter whether an asteroid or meteor can cause gashes into a surface or not. I would look back onto that if i were you and maybe reword what you're trying to argue? That's just what it looks like to me, please correct me if i'm wrong.

Your whole statement was flawed from the very beginning. I would suggest that you reword your argument

Meta,

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>I told you once before to stop analysing me instead if the info, *******.
Im not your standing joke, you got it this time?
This is the last time Im gonna be nice.</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

ANS: Actually another observtion - "No sense of humor".

It isn't good to not be able to laugh especially at ourselves.

PS: I have placed your link in favorites and will be looking to wee what it is you want me to consider.

Lighten up.



"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien

Meta,

Ok I have read your link. I'm not sure where you want to go from there but I saw nothing extraordinary.

I will note that it is quite old and probably is out dated. Meaning there would be much more known now than there was then and all statements being made then (1948) 55 years ago, as a noted expert in vacuum tube technology, must be considered carefully when quoting from such a source. That is see if new data has come forth that alters any of the views being expressed.

What point are you looking for?

"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien