C Squared

More
20 years 11 months ago #6901 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
You state this energy assumption very well. The joule or erg are units everyone uses all the time with no thought at all about what they are. A joule is a wattsecond and a watt is a well understood unit in any system. My point is energy and mass don't have to be united by speed squared even though that is assumed to be correct. The real constant could be a little more or less and no one would know the difference. Or has it been proven?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 11 months ago #6559 by GD
Replied by GD on topic Reply from
I think it has not been proven yet because the universe is still a mystery to us.

Our comprehension of "c squared" is important. We are in the first steps of a better control of particle accelerations (which led us into the nuclear age).

I think this understanding will result in a better knowledge of the relationship between energy, matter, and acceleration.

Is there a correlation between the solar system's acceleration and global warming ?

Is there a connection between Jupiter's orbit and solar activity ?

Matter has a limit to its acceleration. Too much acceleration might mean less energy for matter, more heat.

I think this is something that should be looked into.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 11 months ago #6596 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
It would be a good thing if acceleration limits were established as you suggest. Do you have any idea how to do this? If you start with the speed limit of the speed of light(light has an exact speed) where does acceleration occur? Heat is infared light interacting with mass so don't use heat as a place to deposit excesses.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 11 months ago #6569 by GD
Replied by GD on topic Reply from
All I have written so far is based on the assumption that entropy increases with time.

The decrease of energy in matter corresponds to an increase of energy in the environment (if energy is to be conserved).Matter does so by releasing its energy.

How does matter react to this change? - It accelerates -

For example: our planet: The greatest accelerations are close to the center of the Earth where matter has the least energy. The accelerations are so great that it "torques" the Earth in a continuous rotation.

I would suspect that the sun, which is the lowest energy "reservoir" in the solar system, has its matter traveling close to the speed of light. But its motion is restrained by matter next to it. These collisions create an incredible amount of energy as E=mc^2 is attained. This is the light and heat that reaches us.

This implies that the atom's energized state responds to its position in space. Its acceleration is an indication of its state.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 11 months ago #6570 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
This link is drifting from the subject of what is a constant in math and nature-C^2; into murky ideas about the cosmos. I don't want to go into all that bs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 11 months ago #6597 by GD
Replied by GD on topic Reply from
Jim,
You are staring in the wrong direction for your answers.
It is not at the equation, but at the stars you should be looking at!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.260 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum