C Squared

The reason c^2 isn't fully understood is because of the arbitrary parameters of the standard model physics. The answers can actually be found in the simplest equations if they're quantified properly.

It has something to do with c^2=E/m so let's go back to the start and take a closer look at a=F/m. It says meter per second^2 or meter per second per second which has always been where acceleration lies. If the classical equation is fleshed out then (t/t)=(d)=(F/m). Now I've been searching for the speed of time almost as long as I've been searching for the speed of G and K and I believe a second propogates at c^2. Watch what happens to the classically fleshed out equation (c^2/c^2)=(d)=(F/m). When the conversion constants cancel (v^2)=(d)=(F/m) but distance occupies the denominator. The acceleration is actually (v^2/d)=(F/m) and the distance is in the denominator because this is in fact the energy proportion Fd=mc^2.

So if the speed of one second was actually known and distance equals velocity times time then d=c^3. A velo, d/t, c^3/c^2, is limited to Al's second special relativity principle of lightspeed. Yet once lightspeed is achieved the equation c^3/c^2 comes into function which acts as the gauge inequality c^2<\/=c^3 and (E/md)=(c^2/2.998x10^8d) allows the speed of light to accelerate to the relative points of c^2 (time) or c^3 (distance).

Digging deeper E=mt but mass equals E/c^2 so E=Et/c^2 which goes quantum E=h/c^2 but it just comes back to the mass times time or the spacextime.

If time's the wagon then c^2 an old horse, least a century old. Time inverts the height and width of the square while distance cubes the depth of everything. Mass is some form of consciousness in this process of nature.

Finally, take the acceleration d=c^3/s^2=c^4 which's 1/c or v/c the relative Mach number that can be used to calculate the gravelocity and all the other imaginary propagation rates. I think c is the max speed for material, gravelocity is the imagination, and chargevelocity is emotion. This is because the emotion of something hits you first, then your mind really has to decode it into the imagination down through light speed before anyone can voice a reaction.

Speaking about the level of certain em phenomena, vacuumotor vessels, or the contemporary gods of lore 'UFOS' it would be transiting hypervirtuality. There's a relative static hyper field and a quantum dynamic virtual fluid interaction (F/m)=(c^2/c^2/d) that acts like, but not exactly as one might think, Bohm's classically hidden variables do.

The unit c^2 is cxc what is there to misunderstand about that? The thing is e=mc^2 has something wrong that I don't understand. Since f=ma can be made to suit e=m^2 and still do a lot more why have e=mc^2 at all? It is redundant and only confuses things more. Just read the post above and that seems clear.

Well E=m_0xc^2 cause it's actually a zero mass equation. Howev, if it was said that E=m_1/0xc^2 where the m is the undefined consciousness energy then we'd have to look at E=hf.

If Fd=mc^2 then ?=hf. Power is energy per time so energy is Pt. In the quantum Fdt/t so this is time cancelling energy like Et/t or Pt. Dealing with the proportional analysis (Pt/hf)=(Fd/mc^2). The cross multiplication produces a laymans uncertainty inequality Ptmc^2>\/=Fdhf that really says E^2>\/=E^2. When we assume the radical c(Ptm>\/=Fdhf)^.5 which will transform into c(Em>\/=Fhc)^.5 because of the temporal cancellation and assuming a distance frequency is lightspeed. So the Em is the momentum, E^2/c^2 and the Fhc is E^2t/t which's c(E^2/c^2>\/=E^2t/t)^.5 that when solved Ec/c>\/=E(t)^.5/(t^.5) proving that if time travels at c^2 then Ec/c>\/=E(c^2)^.5/(c^2)^.5 is Ec/c>\/=Ec/c.

Yet time cancels on both sides of the proportion so the equation would actually look like Ec^2/c^2>\/=Ec/c again showing the versatility of gauge inequality mechanics.

Notice the time cancelled c(E^2/c^2>\/=E^2)^.5 which vulgarly says c(wave^2=cone^2)^.5 allowing the quantum uncertainty arena to fully play through, albeit as the root of its inversion.

Technically I'd have to say that since density=mass/volume meaning that mass=densityxvolume then E=(dv)c^2 and momentum is E/c=(dv)c. Although with the other Pt energy the time cancelling energy is on top of everything. It's the coupling distance energy inside the time cancelling energy because time couples to power for a Watt second, cancels, then distance couples force to get a Joule but if distance cancelled again Pt/d we'd have force, of course.

That c^2 stuff is akin to the massless displacement current NASA uses to keep tabs with the spacecraft having near zero loss in transmit time, like a phone call (E=m^2 where the masses are the voices inverting back and forth). E=mad and I'm mad cause it's like the Fight Club, on the tip of everybody's tongue and it's always A Beautiful Mind vs Matrix Revelations in Groome Lake, Pine Gap, Montauk, on the Eldridge deck, when Eden fell, err wherev.

All we are is temporal echoes intended through space and spatial reflections extended through time. Ec/c>\/=Ec/c are the wheels that're getting us there. So if the propagation rate of time, a second, is c^2 then a minute is going to be 5.393x10^18d^2/s^2/v, 5.393x10^18v. An hour travels 3.234x10^20v, a day travels 7.765x10^21v, a week travels 5.436x10^22v, and finally a whole year travels 2.827x10^24v (just above the speed of gravi/light). Obviously these are all imaginary propagation rates.

Come on, Heaviside shredded Maxwell's quaternions like Edison railroaded Tesla and Einstein tried to Adam Smith the Lorentz Poincare ether joint. Didn't Aristotle have Galileo put in a damn tower while they was yellin at Columbus you gonna fall off the edge of the box kid and heaven forbid they break the sound barrier cause lightspeeds so far behind on this rock that it's actually ahead of gravity and charge applications by a century. Unless of course you work for whatev high influence menipulation agency that deals with vacuumotors, inverse acceleration, and antiherzian frequency (neuralyzer) tech.

Like Hawking said in the White House that time travel's possible but anything we wanna do, we can do it right now. And there's so many ways to say it and variablize it, let alone do it, that we all did it a second ago when c^2 just passed again.

Hi D.O., You have factored in E=hf here and "it is a good thing" to quote a great gal. I like E=hf more than E=m^c or f=ma but there is a problem in how it has been misused by people since it was devised. The problem is E in E=hf is not a discription of a photon. E is an energy bundle in this relationship. The photon needs to be defined as another all together different thing. So, since people have been doing this for 100 years now it is just about impossible to correct. You use these relationships very well and in truth I don't follow all the math you post but I think some of gets through.

Don,

This matrix revelations as you call it, is something you would want to hide with your pretty equations. Don't forget: this is just for fun right?

Don,

Correct me if I'm wrong, but gravity is the force which makes our world beautiful.
Our own bodies depend on the right amount of gravity / heat / potential energy / pressure / entropy.
Does this not unify everything ?