Antigravity Research

OPEN SYSTEM FLUCTUATIONS OF THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT AND FTL MOTION

The entire Universe is in extreme motion. The fallacy that only frequencies exist in a visible spectrum is the primary cause for our current scientific failures in creating a unified field theory. We have failed to see how thermodynamics is not constant and can fluctuate from changing the relationship with above light frequencies. For instance, sub ground states of hydrogen form high temperature plasmas revealing a relationship with a higher pressure gradient that normally is not available in a standard model.

It is a total fallacy that a non motion visible universe and zero point energy exists in a closed system. It is such a confussed state of affairs that a visible universe is assumed to be not in motion, but our galaxy is moving towards a great attractor at extreme speeds, and mean while an imaginary 96 percent of universe is dark matter, of which only 4 percent is matter, is the cause for such extreme expansion and motion. Space is infinite in all directions, singularities cannot exist because there is no space time curvature if space is an infinity. Infinities with in infinities, that is a good one!!!!

Back to reality, so the Universe is in extreme motion. If we fail to ask the right questions, we get the wrong answers. A higher frequency full bodied spectrum reveals an open architecture that is hyperdimensional. Motion, inertia,---most of our concepts become irrelevant when the standard model suddenly is overwhelmed by these higher frequency relationships. Because the cause for all motion is the constant collapsing wavefronts between forward and reverse time, energy can be extremely hot or extremely cold. For instance, cycling antigravitons would produce a tremendous release of superconductance above positron currents that would operate columnar in a gravity well, and create extreme antigravity repulsive motion. Here again standard model rules are broken simply because we have failed to recognize the true nature of energy. Our existing laws of conservation of energy model only works in a gravity field where there is resistance, however in an antigravity field the resistance is eliminated creating a very powerful unlimited amounts of available free energy. This process is reversed in reverse time, then it is the graviton field that becomes cold energy and repulsive for antimatter. John

THE ASYMMETRIC BALANCE OF MATTER OVER ANTIMATTER IN FORWARD TIME

IF G is 20 billion x C, the Available G conversion rate to Mass must be 4% if we use existing ratio's of mass to dark matter/energy. Roughly a 1/2500 ratio of matter to graviton energy should equal 100% of mass with only 4% operating with in visible range. Most of the energy/mass is operating above light frequencies. Since we do not have an accurate percentage of available antimatter in forward time, let's just guess that matter makes up 96% of visible universe with most of the 50% reverse time hidden antimatter either inside matter or visible as antimatter clouds from galactic core induction. The Antigraviton Cycle then is strong enough to counter balance incoming gravitons with a 2.38% difference in greater G-force [based on MG-AG=96% difference between 4% available energy for matter and antimatter mass generation at speed of G] which allows matter to dominate in forward time.

Here is a schematic showing an electron dual time wave in a 4D matrix:





"A New Interpretation of Quantum Theory Time as Hidden Variable. Our single particle is none other than the electron (our YGEM). Dr. Chen has the basics of the concept but is lacking the model. Again, that model is the basic electron. We claim the electron is made up of 918 paired photons. We have just satisfied the conditions for the area of a sphere for our first matter particle shape plus the conditions for the spin of that basic particle. With 4D Unified Math, all we need to do is plug in the 4Pis for each portal and calculate as we did with arithmetic Pi or trigonometric Pi and obtain the exact same results as current findings for a particle with a spin or 720 degrees. We will go one step further and calculate the spin of a particle by using higher math such as Pauli matrices. We will then plug in 4D Unified Math to meet the same conditions set up in equation number 18 on the calculations below. Notice that using 4D Unified Math will yield more data than our current lower or higher math methods. With 4D Unified Math we get the composite, dynamic view of the particle and its unification process. Look at the YGEM, 4D Unified Math intrinsic spin graphic and the other modern math methods again and you should see the connection. This is exciting for it makes that connection between our quantum world and our physical world as a one-particle theory. This is the unification process. A unified field theory based on light. Time and gravity can now be extracted and engineered under specific conditions where it was only a word before."

www.journaloftheoretics.com/Articles/3-1/4D-final.htm


The appearance of high speed galactic rotations, with reverse motion antimatter cores radiating antigravitons and relativity jets at C appears static in an isotropic visible universe. Large scale rotation exists, we simply are not able to see it because this expanse is moving together as an entire unit. Otherwise, without actual physical motion of particles dark matter/energy which is really just antimatter cannot physically cause any motion. An exchange has to take place, that is why cores of galaxies form jets that are 17,400 trillion miles long. The interactions are too great for an exchange not to take place. Regarding inflation and expansion of Universe? I really do not think we can have it both ways flat and isotropic with zero rotation and yet is expanding at the speed of light from where???? Our current observations are wrong since we are biasing the data towards the big bang model which is impossible and never happened. This is a dual rotation paired between forward and reverse time. Mass does not clump together without rotation and antimatter core induction---releasing the high G forces back towards reverse time! John

GALACTIC CLUSTERS ARE FAMILIES OF GALAXIES

"An intrinsic interpretation of the redshift will imply a much different universe. For example, in the middle of the constellation of Virgo, the brightest galaxies, the brightest quasars and brightest clusters of galaxies are connected by the strongest radio and x-ray fields in the sky. The expanding universe assumption - that redshift equals velocity equals distance - separates these objects by billions of light-years, and assumes their side-by-side position is coincidental. But its not coincidence. These objects belong together. They make up an evolving galactic family whose genealogy can be traced through four generations.

Well never "see" this universe as long as we remain captive in the coffin of the Big Bang viewpoint. The assumption that redshift can only be caused by recessional velocity predetermines a distorted understanding of the shape, age, size, and physical characteristics of most of the extragalactic universe. A different - intrinsic - interpretation of the redshift will imply a much different universe. Even the meaning of the terms we use to describe that universe will have to change.



Take, for example, the term, "galactic cluster." That term is currently defined by the yardstick of Big Bang expansion: at least 30 galaxies (in addition to the brightest two) within a range of 2 magnitudes and approximately the same redshift. According to this definition, there are 4,073 clusters (listed in the revised northern and southern Abell Catalogue.)

Now lets look at a galactic cluster in the non-Big Bang universe. Lets assume (as Halton Arps observations seem to suggest) that a galactic cluster is a family of galaxies and quasars and gaseous clouds of varying redshifts. At the center, we find a dominant galaxy - its usually the largest galaxy, and the galaxy with the lowest redshift of the cluster. This dominant galaxy is surrounded by low-to-medium redshift galaxies, and toward the edges of the cluster we find the highest redshift galaxies, HII regions, BL Lac objects and quasars."



The universe is continuously creating new mass from antimatter core quasar ejections that form families of galaxies. John

Hi Stoat, What is it that creates this blind spot in our intellect forbidding us to see this greater graviton energy cycle? Also why doesn't this extreme graviton energy not register at far greater factors in QED Constants? It may be just that a cut off point beyond the electron charge collapsing half waves exists at a certain frequency but can be breached, e.g., lowering electron orbits to sub ground states release very high energy levels. It also could be a balancing act that is so sublime that matter is pushed while antimatter is repulsed [pushed in the opposite direction away from gravity well] as seen in the antimatter clouds recently discovered surrounding galaxies. Matter is more balanced internally with antimatter in atomic structures which lessons the effects of this inward push.

"It is proposed that the cosmological dark energy consists primarily of anti-particle anti-gravity. According to the theory of Noyes and Starson in their paper DiscreteAntigravity[1] anti-particles near the surface of the earth will fall up with the same acceleration that the corresponding particles fall down. cite: Walter R. Lamb"

www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-12849.pdf


I predict that there is a preferred frame of motion in aether ever so slight but maybe enough to indicate that this entire arm of a supergalactic structure is moving as one unit and expanding apart at the same time. There is an aging process and maybe even light is slowing down simply because we are moving away from the hot creational zone. The next generation James Web telescope might blow our minds and maybe we will be able to look through the voids and see another arm of our local supergalaxy. There may be other directional indicators hence forth not recognized yet, for instance we should look at galactic jets is there a propensity towards a certain top or bottom direction indicating either local or maybe large scale influence?

THE CAUSE OF MOTION IN UNIVERSE

GRAVITON CYCLE................Rt to Ft Exchange -g<<<

<<< Forward Time (Ft)-G/+g) >< Reverse Time (Rt)+G/-g)>>>

ANTIGRAVITON CYCLE............Ft to Rt Exchange +g>>>

Two counter rotating matter and antimatter regions of space chasing each other because of the core dynamo radiations stoping just in time the annihilation of forward and reverse time. A breach in this rotation would create a Big Bang! No singularities are involved because core induction processes flip gravitational energies which is part of the total circulating graviton system. So, the counter balanced reverse spinning matter and antimatter perpetually move around each other. Gravitons are born in cores of antimatter galaxies and this forward time energy creates mass in this visible universe.

Sub scale matter and antimatter pairing, reveals that indeed that all scales including this large motion is a paired particle with antimatter. John

Advanced civilizations after billions of years probably move up stream into younger regions of space to occupy newer created systems in both galaxies, and in the larger scale of our visible arm of this super circulation.

ESA INTEGRAL UNABLE TO DETECT SOURCE FOR X-RAY BACKGROUND

Where are the supermassive black holes hiding?


"26 July 2006 ---European and American scientists, on a quest to find super-massive black holes hiding in nearby galaxies, have found surprisingly few. Either the black holes are better hidden than scientists realised or they are lurking only in the more distant universe.

---Now astronomers from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and the Integral Science Data Centre near Geneva, Switzerland, have found an even smaller fraction using nearly two years of continuous data, also from Integral. The work shows that there is clearly too few hidden black holes in the nearby Universe to create the observed X-ray background radiation.

"Naturally, it is difficult to find something we know is hiding well and which has eluded detection so far," says Volker Beckmann of NASA Goddard and the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, lead author of the new report to be published in an upcoming issue of The Astrophysical Journal. "Integral is a telescope that should see nearby hidden black holes, but we have come up short," he says.

The X-ray sky is thousands to millions of times more energetic than the visible sky familiar to our eyes. Much of the X-ray activity is thought to come from black holes violently sucking in gas from their surroundings.


Recent breakthroughs in X-ray astronomy, including a thorough black hole census taken by NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, have all dealt with lower-energy X-rays. The energy range is roughly 2 000 to 20 000 electron-volts (optical light, in comparison, is about 2 electron-volts). The two Integral surveys are the first glimpse into the largely unexplored higher-energy, or 'hard', X-ray regime of 20 000 to 300 000 electron-volts.

"The X-ray background, this pervasive blanket of X-ray light we see everywhere in the universe, peaks at about 30 000 electron volts, yet we really know next to nothing about what produces this radiation," says Neil Gehrels of NASA Goddard, a co-author.

The theory is that hidden black holes, which scientists call Compton-thick objects, are responsible for the 30 000 electron-volts peak of X-rays in the cosmic X-ray background. Integral is the first satellite sensitive enough to search for them in the local universe...."

www.esa.int/esaSC/SEMGM6BUQPE_index_0.html

Maybe the CMB has a higher level of x-ray emmissions due to graviton cycle interacting with the large antimatter regions surrounding galactic planes and not from the actual antimatter induction taking place inside black holes.

Also, ionized hydrogen clouds capture gravitons creating large magnetic fields that are funneled into the field circuits of pulsar nuetron stars creating polar x-ray jets. I think X-ray emmissions are tied to graviton interactions, and I submit that x-ray levels are more keyed to a graviton cycle which is the cause of these high x-ray levels originating from CMB which is a pervasive graviton interaction across forward time portion of universe and not from central black holes.

Had a great summer vacation, we enjoyed meeting with Tom and his wife and now we are back home. John

EPH, GRAVITON CAPTURE, AND OUR FAILED BINARY STAR SYSTEM

I think that collapsing fields of Gravitons which carry a negative charge and originate from reverse time antimatter portion of our scale are travelling so fast that most just pass right through mass and head directly towards the eye wall of our galaxies black holes. Evidence shows that so called Black Holes do not have strong magnetic fields at least none can be seen because most likely this circulation is FTL and non-radiative pure Gravitons. It is only when Gravitons slow down and take on mass from deflated spin that they become captured forming magnetic fields so it makes sense that none would be found around black holes. Strong magnetic fields generated by the gravitons cycling around and through mass create positive and negative polar circuits. This graviton energy that is responsible for nucleogenesis is constantly flipping into a positive state forming antimatter. If core antimatter becomes out of balance at any level of nucleogenesis from Neutron Star bursts, to Galactic Core antimatter factories then you will have an explosion from antimatter matter annihilations. Most articles and posts ignore graviton interactions and until we can see gravitons as part of a large scale cycle between forward time motion and reverse time motion we will not understand how energy cycles in our universe.

EPH suggests that graviton overloading can occur due to interference from either a passing large intruder or too close proximity to a jupiter size planets gravity field causing core overheating. Bodes law shows that a preferred orbital state exists between bodies and if these resonance zones are out of balance then graviton flipping states forming antimatter can be accelerated causing antimatter matter annihilations.

What if the reocurring 26 million year extinctions on Earth, and a possible 10,800 B.C. pole shift from Hudson Bay [Happgood states it took 2,000 years but what if it happened in one day] innitiating the Younger Dryas was caused by a passing failed Binary Star that locked gravity fields with Earth and is related to the same events that destroyed the Fifth planet. As Tom has thoroughly researched, Mars had a sister moon that was also destroyed approximately 3.2 million years ago. I think that is the event that blew off the major portion of the remaining Martian atmosphere and left Mars and her oceans frozen.

If we live in a failed binary star system, would NASA release news of the finding of a great intruder? IRAS infrared scans have found nothing so far or have they? Given the obvious ruins on Mars and other suppression my guess is that if a great destroyer does exist it has already been found. John