- Thank you received: 0
Antigravity Research
- cosmicsurfer
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
16 years 7 months ago #20193
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Stoat, So what created the neutron? Gamma rays are created by forward and reverse time matter and antimatter annihilations. The graviton is the first particle to be formed not the last. All decay processes are the result of internal atomic annihilations causing radiation. Whereas, the GRAVITON CYCLE is the cause for visible universe motion and forms from either antimatter black hole matter induction, or next scale up collapsing aether condensation of gravitons like a constant rain into this forward time paired motion. Gravitons are so fast and so small that literally all other particles are formed as a condensate of this initial motion, maybe the negative r.i. region is FTL in atoms---that might be the place where the two wheels/gears intersect. But at 20 billion x speed of light gravitons pass right through mass and get captured as an extremely compact high frequency spin component creating magnetic flux.
The process of antimatter induction in forward time generates antigravitons which push away from mass causing the separation of clouds of antimatter from matter, i.e., antimatter induction at galactic center is caused by FTL gravitons cycling around black hole inducing a reverse motion formation of antimatter core and generation of FTL antigraviton jets. John
The process of antimatter induction in forward time generates antigravitons which push away from mass causing the separation of clouds of antimatter from matter, i.e., antimatter induction at galactic center is caused by FTL gravitons cycling around black hole inducing a reverse motion formation of antimatter core and generation of FTL antigraviton jets. John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 years 7 months ago #20195
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Hi John, its a good job you wrote so quickly. I realised that I had made a pretty stupid mistake. No news there then!
The spin of a photon is zero not one. Right, from the neutron decay we have about one and a half electrons, in energy, left over to get rid of. Thats 1.5091889611E 33 photon rest masses. The reciprocal of h. So we look at the rest mass photon. Its balanced, half potential energy, half kinetic energy, so its at rest. To get translational movement we need to add h to one side and take it away from the other. Keep doing that until we have h on one side. But the core of the photon already has an angular momentum of one. So that becomes two minus h.
The result is that we have a compton photon, and a light speed graviton. We dont have spins of zero and two but they are very close to those numbers. The light speed graviton accelerates to the speed of gravity, remember that this things wavelength is the size of the electromagnetic universe, by the time its out of the nucleus its not in our space at all.
The spin of a photon is zero not one. Right, from the neutron decay we have about one and a half electrons, in energy, left over to get rid of. Thats 1.5091889611E 33 photon rest masses. The reciprocal of h. So we look at the rest mass photon. Its balanced, half potential energy, half kinetic energy, so its at rest. To get translational movement we need to add h to one side and take it away from the other. Keep doing that until we have h on one side. But the core of the photon already has an angular momentum of one. So that becomes two minus h.
The result is that we have a compton photon, and a light speed graviton. We dont have spins of zero and two but they are very close to those numbers. The light speed graviton accelerates to the speed of gravity, remember that this things wavelength is the size of the electromagnetic universe, by the time its out of the nucleus its not in our space at all.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 years 7 months ago #20030
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Oh yeah, so what created the neutron? One more thing on the neutron, to help balance the books its thought that with the neutrons decay we must regard the neutrino as an antineutrino.
When a proton is converted into a neutron, we get a neutron, a positron and a neutrino. This begs the question, do we have an anti graviton, and an anti photon for that matter? I can see no reason why not, Which is which? That's anther good question which I'm clueless about at the moment.
Note though that the nucleus is supposed to stay together, against the repulsion of like charged protons, by the protons swopping back and forth, between being protons and neutrons. The graviton and compton wavelength photon are without doubt involved in that interaction.
When a proton is converted into a neutron, we get a neutron, a positron and a neutrino. This begs the question, do we have an anti graviton, and an anti photon for that matter? I can see no reason why not, Which is which? That's anther good question which I'm clueless about at the moment.
Note though that the nucleus is supposed to stay together, against the repulsion of like charged protons, by the protons swopping back and forth, between being protons and neutrons. The graviton and compton wavelength photon are without doubt involved in that interaction.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 7 months ago #20031
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Stoat, Very interesting so when you say graviton field or BEC is not in our may I say universe, with small letters, then possibly we could be seeing an exchange much like that of photons/electron emmissions or absorptions. Because of this frequency difference at FTL speeds the graviton spin is so great that the field would be huge---call it a torsion/gravitostatic field, that literally feels static amazingly because it operates slightly out of reach so to speak. So, if gravitons are the same charge as electrons you almost have a similar operation going on only at a much larger level. That is why I saw fast moving very small gravitons actually forming the magnetic field in polar circuits around atoms, electric currents and all mass. Gravitons/electrons/photon generation during orbit changes or electron/positron annihilations could be part of this continuous collapse process beginning in the Neg R.I. portion. Carrying this thinking further, it might be that it is the antigraviton that is actually being formed in matter rather then gravitons. John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 7 months ago #20253
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
If we step back far enough to see our two large scale "paired particles" of forward and reverse time moving at extreme speeds around each other. The graviton would be the electron and as you described would be emmited by the reverse time particle. Whereas the antigraviton would be emmited by the forward time particle and total absorption would take place in black holes.
Going back to atomic exchange levels, the graviton has to be very small but extremely fast and as it decreases its energy level and orbit around atoms, currents, etc, those gravitons not continuing on towards the greatest concentration of mass would pass on their energy and be totally absorbed---decaying orbit/receptors/micro black hole. It is the Graviton that defines forward time and keeps steady all processes, and masks the fact that CP violations are created by gravitons because of Time differences between a neg r.i. region around and within atoms that is either just arriving or just leaving out of sight of our time frequencies of light. Something else I thought of regarding atomic energy, imagine gravitons as a tightly wound spring attached to each atom that originated in reverse time---gives a whole new perspective on the amount of energy torgue behind atomic power. John
Going back to atomic exchange levels, the graviton has to be very small but extremely fast and as it decreases its energy level and orbit around atoms, currents, etc, those gravitons not continuing on towards the greatest concentration of mass would pass on their energy and be totally absorbed---decaying orbit/receptors/micro black hole. It is the Graviton that defines forward time and keeps steady all processes, and masks the fact that CP violations are created by gravitons because of Time differences between a neg r.i. region around and within atoms that is either just arriving or just leaving out of sight of our time frequencies of light. Something else I thought of regarding atomic energy, imagine gravitons as a tightly wound spring attached to each atom that originated in reverse time---gives a whole new perspective on the amount of energy torgue behind atomic power. John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 7 months ago #20061
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
I do not see a link between photons and gravitons, because 4D motion is winding down to our scale of motion. Also, photons exchange both ways not one way like gravitons. Such huge differences in speed reveal that this same ratio may operate in higher scale motions that are also paired in huge assemblies of forward and reverse rotations.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.320 seconds