- Thank you received: 0
C Squared
20 years 6 months ago #10022
by Don Omni
Replied by Don Omni on topic Reply from
Larry,
It's misleading to think the zerotorus merely has one North Pole and one South Pole when the entire circumference of its top is the North Pole and the entire circumference of its bottom is the South Pole. This is corrected if the zerotorus is made vertical like the ring around URANUS. The torusphere would then look like
.................................m_N
.................................m_N
.......m_W=m_C1<\/=m_W=m_E>\/=m_C2=m_E
.................................m_S
.................................m_S
Obviously this is the vertical bipole derivation where the zerosphere poles are real and the zerotorus poles are imaginary, still a function of the wave cone equation E^2/c>\/=h^2/16pi^2tq. Although I'm not relinquishing everything concerning the zerosphere, the zerotorus, and the torusphere, if you dump your finger on your problem with the zerotorus, your criticism is welcomed.
The zerotorus works well in the humanitarian corroLarry where a person is characterized as m_Top=m_Side=m_Front=m_Back=m_Side=m_Bottom.
Personally the name Don means 'world rule' and the name Omni (amongst a host of definitions) means 'all' hence the name Don Omni means 'ruler of all worlds'.
In regards to 'us guys' being kinda slow, I've personally determined the theoretical gravelocity (speed of G) which's 3.359x10^14m/s that is kinda slow when compared to the theoretical chargevelocity (speed of K) which's 4.976x10^35m/s.
Hope ya had fun at the flea circus.
It's misleading to think the zerotorus merely has one North Pole and one South Pole when the entire circumference of its top is the North Pole and the entire circumference of its bottom is the South Pole. This is corrected if the zerotorus is made vertical like the ring around URANUS. The torusphere would then look like
.................................m_N
.................................m_N
.......m_W=m_C1<\/=m_W=m_E>\/=m_C2=m_E
.................................m_S
.................................m_S
Obviously this is the vertical bipole derivation where the zerosphere poles are real and the zerotorus poles are imaginary, still a function of the wave cone equation E^2/c>\/=h^2/16pi^2tq. Although I'm not relinquishing everything concerning the zerosphere, the zerotorus, and the torusphere, if you dump your finger on your problem with the zerotorus, your criticism is welcomed.
The zerotorus works well in the humanitarian corroLarry where a person is characterized as m_Top=m_Side=m_Front=m_Back=m_Side=m_Bottom.
Personally the name Don means 'world rule' and the name Omni (amongst a host of definitions) means 'all' hence the name Don Omni means 'ruler of all worlds'.
In regards to 'us guys' being kinda slow, I've personally determined the theoretical gravelocity (speed of G) which's 3.359x10^14m/s that is kinda slow when compared to the theoretical chargevelocity (speed of K) which's 4.976x10^35m/s.
Hope ya had fun at the flea circus.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 6 months ago #11205
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
So here we go again with the silly remarks that have nothing to do with whatever. You guys should send that stuff to the latenite show and focus on the topic. I'm even working on an example for LB.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
20 years 6 months ago #10115
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
Jim,
What would that topic be? The invisible imaginary zerotorus? Dumbasstrollogy (copyright)? Or perhaps it is the (obvious) vertical bipole derivation?
Why should they have all the fun? I've always enjoyed playing with words. I see no reason not to join in.
Regards,
LB
What would that topic be? The invisible imaginary zerotorus? Dumbasstrollogy (copyright)? Or perhaps it is the (obvious) vertical bipole derivation?
Why should they have all the fun? I've always enjoyed playing with words. I see no reason not to join in.
Regards,
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
20 years 6 months ago #10023
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
Jim,
I would prefer that this message board only talked about science topics. But, since we are all kooks by the standards of the mainstream, it almost goes without saying that OUR definition of science topics has to be somewhat more - loose? - than the one that would be used on a mainstream board.
So, does everything that gets talked about here fit even our loose definition?
No, of course not. But it probably isn't worth the effort to try to filter out the crap (the carp, har har!! that was a good one. And I didn't catch it till Dr. Van Flandern pointed it out.)
Bottom line, Jim, don't take everything you read here at face value.
People come here to learn.
People come here to teach.
And, people come here to troll.
Mostly I just ignore the trolls, but from time to time I feed them a few ... things.
It isn't a perfect setup, but all in all it is pretty cool. I have learned a LOT since I started comming here. Some of it was science.
Regards,
LB
I would prefer that this message board only talked about science topics. But, since we are all kooks by the standards of the mainstream, it almost goes without saying that OUR definition of science topics has to be somewhat more - loose? - than the one that would be used on a mainstream board.
So, does everything that gets talked about here fit even our loose definition?
No, of course not. But it probably isn't worth the effort to try to filter out the crap (the carp, har har!! that was a good one. And I didn't catch it till Dr. Van Flandern pointed it out.)
Bottom line, Jim, don't take everything you read here at face value.
People come here to learn.
People come here to teach.
And, people come here to troll.
Mostly I just ignore the trolls, but from time to time I feed them a few ... things.
It isn't a perfect setup, but all in all it is pretty cool. I have learned a LOT since I started comming here. Some of it was science.
Regards,
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 6 months ago #10116
by Don Omni
Replied by Don Omni on topic Reply from
Yeah personally I was hoping one of the sinnocent humant crapitalists in here would be able to flesh out what I'm talking about because it's right there in the wave cone uncertainty posts but putting my faith in those who'd rather rely on sarcasm and vetahw just breeds more la la la.
The zerotorus problem? It isn't fully electric. If Kq^2/d^2>\/=h/16pi^2tq then the missing half of the uncertainty principle is E-Energy>\/=h/4pit and E-momentum>\/=h/4piq. (Although QED deals with this they refuse to come out and say it in as many terms.)
Thus the zerosphere is
F/a=m=p/v=m=E/c^2=m
And the zerotorus is
E-F/a=m=E-p/v=m=E-E/c^2=m
That makes the torusphere electromagnetic (if I chose to operate on it a little more). Or if dumbone else has a theory regarding what the most basic forms of a particle and a wave are, I'd like to see them, please.
Also I asked a few times for theories regarding the true quantum statistics and the defintion of the undefined 1/0 only our little ltd democrazy in here seems to have as many thoughts regarding those as they do the basic nature of a particle and a wave or c^2 itself.
...........................Omni
The zerotorus problem? It isn't fully electric. If Kq^2/d^2>\/=h/16pi^2tq then the missing half of the uncertainty principle is E-Energy>\/=h/4pit and E-momentum>\/=h/4piq. (Although QED deals with this they refuse to come out and say it in as many terms.)
Thus the zerosphere is
F/a=m=p/v=m=E/c^2=m
And the zerotorus is
E-F/a=m=E-p/v=m=E-E/c^2=m
That makes the torusphere electromagnetic (if I chose to operate on it a little more). Or if dumbone else has a theory regarding what the most basic forms of a particle and a wave are, I'd like to see them, please.
Also I asked a few times for theories regarding the true quantum statistics and the defintion of the undefined 1/0 only our little ltd democrazy in here seems to have as many thoughts regarding those as they do the basic nature of a particle and a wave or c^2 itself.
...........................Omni
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 6 months ago #10307
by GD
Replied by GD on topic Reply from
What's great about us humans, is that we've evolved away from flea pick'n and left that for lower primates to enjoy.
The latter do not question anything either. all that matters is that their stock of bananas is plentiful.
The latter do not question anything either. all that matters is that their stock of bananas is plentiful.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.418 seconds