- Thank you received: 0
My pareidolia knows no bounds.
18 years 2 months ago #9307
by Trinket
Replied by Trinket on topic Reply from Bob
I can understand using this type of counting on any earth based objects..
On mars construction was completed by advanced intellect that didn't think in singular terms as you do. On earth an eye is an eye.. On Mars an eye is an eye,ear,mouth nose.blemish etc. etc. etc. all at the same time..
What face are we to display.. the misrepresented misunderstood one from 1976?
Heres 1 no arrows left side ear top hat..
ANd lord said know what is in front of you and what is hidden will be revealed..
On mars construction was completed by advanced intellect that didn't think in singular terms as you do. On earth an eye is an eye.. On Mars an eye is an eye,ear,mouth nose.blemish etc. etc. etc. all at the same time..
What face are we to display.. the misrepresented misunderstood one from 1976?
Heres 1 no arrows left side ear top hat..
ANd lord said know what is in front of you and what is hidden will be revealed..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 2 months ago #16237
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Trinket</i>
<br />Heres 1 no arrows left side ear top hat.. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">That's a good one! I like it. That's the beauty of pareilolia. Each one of us can add to it, permutate it, debate it, negate it, and pretty much do an infinite number of variations on it. Like fingerprints.
rd
<br />Heres 1 no arrows left side ear top hat.. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">That's a good one! I like it. That's the beauty of pareilolia. Each one of us can add to it, permutate it, debate it, negate it, and pretty much do an infinite number of variations on it. Like fingerprints.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 2 months ago #9308
by Trinket
Replied by Trinket on topic Reply from Bob
You may call it paredoia, if you so choose..
Me I'll decide what reality is for myself..
I haven't met anyone who demonstrated a better understanding of reality to me
than what I deem as my personal understanding of what reality is.. Much of what you see, you just may ,,take for granted ..I know every tiny detail is important.... The information to determine validity although better in some images than others is in each and every image..
If I could convince people of anything , I would attempt to convince them to look at every detail of everything as if it was intended to be there..then add a major reduction in clarity and depth a, a little painting and were there..
Me I'll decide what reality is for myself..
I haven't met anyone who demonstrated a better understanding of reality to me
than what I deem as my personal understanding of what reality is.. Much of what you see, you just may ,,take for granted ..I know every tiny detail is important.... The information to determine validity although better in some images than others is in each and every image..
If I could convince people of anything , I would attempt to convince them to look at every detail of everything as if it was intended to be there..then add a major reduction in clarity and depth a, a little painting and were there..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 2 months ago #9310
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Trinket</i>
<br />The information to determine validity although better in some images than others is in each and every image.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Actually Trinket, I have to thank you for this. You helped me get to an important point I wanted to make, and why I've been posting the Cydonia Face.
The way you drew in the face outline does in fact (finally) put the face features (both eyes and west mouth) in perspective. But the problem with that is it makes no sense at all when you look at the other side, as depicted in the last two images I posted. I could do a composite of this west half with a right half from one of the other two, but if you look at the acquisition parameters you'll see that they are close enough to mean we're pretty much looking straight down on the face in all three. Not perfectly, but certainly strait enough so that the mesa looks symetrical.
So.....by drawing the face the way you did, it makes it seem like it's looking over to our right and down. But that makes no sense in the context of a symetrical mesa. That would be like looking straight at a suit of armor and expecting the persons head to be looking over to the right and down. Sure the man might do that, but would artists create a massive sculpture like that? Somehow I doubt it.
But anyway, to get back to my main point, how do these features fit into the other side as posted in the two previous images? That's the main question, although this is one important question (i.e., is the face really symetrical with the mesa?).
rd
<br />The information to determine validity although better in some images than others is in each and every image.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Actually Trinket, I have to thank you for this. You helped me get to an important point I wanted to make, and why I've been posting the Cydonia Face.
The way you drew in the face outline does in fact (finally) put the face features (both eyes and west mouth) in perspective. But the problem with that is it makes no sense at all when you look at the other side, as depicted in the last two images I posted. I could do a composite of this west half with a right half from one of the other two, but if you look at the acquisition parameters you'll see that they are close enough to mean we're pretty much looking straight down on the face in all three. Not perfectly, but certainly strait enough so that the mesa looks symetrical.
So.....by drawing the face the way you did, it makes it seem like it's looking over to our right and down. But that makes no sense in the context of a symetrical mesa. That would be like looking straight at a suit of armor and expecting the persons head to be looking over to the right and down. Sure the man might do that, but would artists create a massive sculpture like that? Somehow I doubt it.
But anyway, to get back to my main point, how do these features fit into the other side as posted in the two previous images? That's the main question, although this is one important question (i.e., is the face really symetrical with the mesa?).
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 2 months ago #16017
by Trinket
Replied by Trinket on topic Reply from Bob
Actually RD..
I respectfully disagree with you..
An understanding that this art is in scale, is paramount.. certain features will only combine at certain height or scale.. "A" larger face is looking more forward and to the left..
When confronted with more than one particular feature. For Instance 2 mouths.. it is not a question of which one .. But each has it's own sum..
I really believe I can convince anyone of the reality of mars( In person).. Unfortunately I just don't know how to do it with this medium(as of yet).. This is really the issue I am working to resolve..While there are applications that allow you to share graphic applications they are very limited.. I am hoping to take a good image and do a demonstration with camtasia or something simular..
I respectfully disagree with you..
An understanding that this art is in scale, is paramount.. certain features will only combine at certain height or scale.. "A" larger face is looking more forward and to the left..
When confronted with more than one particular feature. For Instance 2 mouths.. it is not a question of which one .. But each has it's own sum..
I really believe I can convince anyone of the reality of mars( In person).. Unfortunately I just don't know how to do it with this medium(as of yet).. This is really the issue I am working to resolve..While there are applications that allow you to share graphic applications they are very limited.. I am hoping to take a good image and do a demonstration with camtasia or something simular..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 2 months ago #16239
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Trinket</i>
<br />An understanding that this art is in scale, is paramount.. certain features will only combine at certain height or scale.. "A" larger face is looking more forward and to the left.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Trinket, while I have always found your images to be interesting, I think by adding detail the way you do, to in effect draw in features, you're playing right into the hands of pareidolia. In my opinion, you're going beyond making keys.
rd
<br />An understanding that this art is in scale, is paramount.. certain features will only combine at certain height or scale.. "A" larger face is looking more forward and to the left.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Trinket, while I have always found your images to be interesting, I think by adding detail the way you do, to in effect draw in features, you're playing right into the hands of pareidolia. In my opinion, you're going beyond making keys.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.451 seconds