- Thank you received: 0
Faces from the Chasmas
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
16 years 11 months ago #17964
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
If the artificiality debate were ever to be taken seriously by competent scientists specializing in their respective fields of expertise, much could be learned by studying the imagery we now have. This has been true ever since the first images appeared of the first face on Mars, as expressed in this short article by Arthur C Clarke. It is even more true today.
www.suppressedscience.net/mars.html
Awhile back, I tried to demonstrate artificiality (in an informal way) of the Cydonia face, (see the topic thread "NASA I'm Ready for my Close-up"), by showing the various proposed marks of construction of the face as seen in the high resolution image, I've done the same thing in this thread with other faces imaged by MRO. The current face we are examining is also noteworthy in this respect, it shows similar striations depicting "hair," apparently chiseled-out or carved-out borders, ridges, and secondary features. But again, it is going to require the input of experts, when the time comes, to demonstrate how these features on these artifacts which could be many millions of years old, are unlikely to have been formed by natural processes.
Here are some close-ups of the Viking Profile and the Emblem Face positioned above its "forehead." [Neil DeRosa]
Viking Profile (VP) eye socket and nose close-up
Viking Profile (VP) eye socket and nose close-up 2
Viking Profile (VP) eye socket and nose close-up 3
Emblem Face close-up 1
Emblem Face close-up 2
Emblem Face close-up 3
Emblem Face close-up 4
Emblem Face close-up 5
Emblem Face close-up 6
www.suppressedscience.net/mars.html
Awhile back, I tried to demonstrate artificiality (in an informal way) of the Cydonia face, (see the topic thread "NASA I'm Ready for my Close-up"), by showing the various proposed marks of construction of the face as seen in the high resolution image, I've done the same thing in this thread with other faces imaged by MRO. The current face we are examining is also noteworthy in this respect, it shows similar striations depicting "hair," apparently chiseled-out or carved-out borders, ridges, and secondary features. But again, it is going to require the input of experts, when the time comes, to demonstrate how these features on these artifacts which could be many millions of years old, are unlikely to have been formed by natural processes.
Here are some close-ups of the Viking Profile and the Emblem Face positioned above its "forehead." [Neil DeRosa]
Viking Profile (VP) eye socket and nose close-up
Viking Profile (VP) eye socket and nose close-up 2
Viking Profile (VP) eye socket and nose close-up 3
Emblem Face close-up 1
Emblem Face close-up 2
Emblem Face close-up 3
Emblem Face close-up 4
Emblem Face close-up 5
Emblem Face close-up 6
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 years 11 months ago #18373
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
Are these last images supposed to depict something?
rd
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 11 months ago #18374
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Are these last images supposed to depict something?
rd<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Please refer to above edited post in which images are now labeled. The posts above that (esp. Nov. 21) have the context images for the close-ups.
Neil
rd<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Please refer to above edited post in which images are now labeled. The posts above that (esp. Nov. 21) have the context images for the close-ups.
Neil
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 11 months ago #18382
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
If you remove the background, what you have left is similar to a studio photo or painting, and there is little doubt you are looking at an artistic rendition of a human-like face; like the one seen perhaps by the passing astronaut or tourist of olden times. Thanks to these new excellent specimens found by Trinket, and to a lesser extent some found by this writer, we have the beginnings of a good record of high-definition faces imaged by MRO to further the artificiality hypothesis for Mars. Some details were supplied last time, here's the bigger picture. [Neil DeRosa]
Wil PSP 002481 1740 and 3800 3899
And here's Wil's mound or tetrahedron again.
Wil PSP 002481 1740 and 3800 3899
And here's Wil's mound or tetrahedron again.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Zip Monster
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 11 months ago #18243
by Zip Monster
Replied by Zip Monster on topic Reply from George
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 years 10 months ago #18849
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Has anyone found an analogue of Mt. Pelee on Mars? Mount Pelee, in Martinique, extruded a plug of pumice of about 3000 metres. It would be interesting to know if the same thing happens on Mars. The plug should be even taller and one would expect it to collapse like a fallen tree down the side of the volcano cone.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.724 seconds