Infinite Space and Time...How?

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>Here again pure assertion, you declare infinity can only exist in mathematical models because you say so, <u>even though you allowed energy to be infinite.</u> Your observational evidence is apparently the standard model which we will have to agree to disagree on.<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

The <u>amount</u> of Energy is finite, its life span is infinite. Perhaps I should have called it eternal, that might help resolve any arguement.

Sounds to me that Mac might be right on target here. Where can we find good info on Chiral Condensate?

Just learning!
Magoo

Dummy,

Start with the web. I will later today be posting some info from other Scientific Journal reference testing that they claim proves Relativity invalid and many of the concepts I hold dear to infact be preferable to current physics views.

i.e.
1 - Time Does Not Exist.

2 - Space is energy, matter is condensed energy.

3 - Distance is variable based on mass between bodies being measured and the observer.

4 - Much more.

It is recognized that some of this material is another theory not necessarialy fact but there is also evalutaion of tests that are the basis of the new views.

It all needs to be considered.

Mac

Mac,

You've got your work cut out for you proving that time does not exist. I look in the mirror and I am always looking older, never younger. Can you explain that? But I haven't had time yet to recheck your website to get a fuller explanation. I will try to do that this weekend before I dismiss it out of hand.

Dummy,

You did it again! Energy is ETERNAL but time is finite, I don't get it.

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>(Jeremy)
Dummy,

You did it again! Energy is ETERNAL but time is finite, I don't get it.<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Correct! Perhaps you should look at the definition of eternal:
"Being without beginning or end; <u>existing outside of time</u>".

Just learning!
Magoo

Jereme,

Your response is appreciated and understood. MOre than happy for you to have a look around but don't make your decision based on my work it is lay work 50 years old.

But I will post links to simular information that is current based on work of qualified scientist. That merely means that there are disagreements between, Tom and the MM group, Einstien believers, myself and others. At the same time there is a lot of common ground between MM and UniKEF. UniKEF is also a "Push Gravity" view.

Somwhere, perhaps in the form of mereger and consolidation the truth probably resides. That is to say I doubt seriously that UniKEF is the cats meow. I know it isn't but there appears to be some truth in there as well as with some of thses other works.

So in that regard it is not really up to me to "Prove" time doesn't exist. I present my thinking and conclusion on the physical signifigance of that being the case but I certain haven't proven it.

www.journaloftheoretics.com

See: "Why Time Does Not Exist"
"The Laws of Space and Observation"

Also scroll until you locate "Archived Editorials". There are a half dozen other very interesting papers.



Mac

From Jeremy (profound statement)

I look in the mirror and I am always looking older, never younger.

---

The mirror's reflecting light from the reverse-condensing and slowly disintegrating energy making up your body.

Time to fix some old cars.