Antigravity Research

Hi Stoat, On a related subject I have noticed how gravitons appear to always be causing anomalous plasmoids in various electron experiments such that H2 becomes H1 during so called joecell, or molecular hydrogen dissasociations causing a monoatomic state. Why am I addressing this issue? Basically, it proves that gravitons exist and that they carry the same exact negative charge as an electron. Thus, H2 or molecular hydrogen is constantly being bound by graviton magnetic fields and the slightest electron pulse or static field discharge can release vast energies from gravitons. So, back to Rodin toroid and your ideas regarding a negative refraction and toroids in general. There is no doubt that Rodin is correct in regards to his mathematical model of the toroid, but does not understand the implications of a graviton cycle. He is still in the old school of singularities, dark matter, and black holes being zero component and does not understand that time is divided in two directions and that matter and antimatter are always paired as opposite directions in motion.

Let's take a further look at your ideas. Need to study tank circuits and how electrons might become a cushion that we skate upon. Since there is a constant relationship between the gravito-magnetic field which is always present and both carry a negative charge then it would make sense that an electric current might cause a negative push against this magnetic field generated by gravitons---So that we could get an antigravity effect and cause H2 bound atoms to release their magnetic graviton energy and that would explain why these anomalous plasmas release such incredible amounts of energy during disassociation of molecular hydrogen. I will comment further after studying your ideas...John

Hi John, surely it doesn't matter in the least what Rodin thinks about singularities. Are you still in touch with him?

I haven't done the maths yet but there is definitely something to thinking of the electron, or proton, as a split ring tank circuit. The electron has a radius of the Compton wavelength, about 2.4E-12 metres. Times 2pi to get the circumference, minus 2*3 to give us our gap. That gives us a gap of about 6.7E-13. But we have to allow for that gap being smaller because of the frequency of the electron. Multiply that number by the reciprocal of the frequency, about 1E-21 and we get something close to h. So let's bite the bullet and say that the gap is going to be h.

So with ice we have a neat array of very very tiny (protons) Rodin coils, which have an h sized gap which acts as the capacitor in a tuned tank circuit. That's half of the components we need to create a super lens.

Perhaps we could make a little gyroscope from one of these. Let's say we have a disk of about 50 mm diameter.We need six holes through it, three at the edge and three offset 60 degrees and at one sixth of the radius in from the edge. We then loop some fairly stout copper wire through these holes and have the ends line up. Glue the ends into a perspex collar and work out our capacitor gap. 2pir - 6r = 7.07 roughly, I don't think it's that critical in this case. Now we need a conducting pin through the centre of our gyro, and it needs a slipring to let us put a voltage through it. We probably need to balance the weight of the perspex collar on the othr side, then we spin it up with a motor.

(Edited) that gap's too big. we need to multiply it by the reciprocal of the revs per second of our motor. So say we have a motor running this thing at 600 rpm, divide by sixty to get 10, over one 0.1 make the gap .71 mm

Hi Stoat, I wanted to go back to your first post regarding a 'tank circuit' analogy for the electron and proton relationship. I agree that there certainly is a harmonic oscillation between the ring circuit of the electron and the induction taking place within the proton. First off, the gravitomagnetic field is the source for charging the system. Second, the proton although it is the anode in this relationship with the cathode electron also acts like you stated as a capacitor because of the Mesons that form a two way exchange with micro-black hole induction circuits. Matter and Antimatter induction takes place with in these micro black holes with in the Quark and Antiquark as they race around their own Meson toroidal ring circuit exchanging flux. This harmonically balanced system is only in motion because of the Graviton Cycle. Let's look at ice skating again and the steel blade. Steel is loaded with electrons and the mere fact that these hydrogen molecules are hit with a new gravitomagnetic field surrounding the steel blade, the extra 'bump' in field could liberate H2 to H1 causing localized heating making the ice melt very quickly. Causing the slippery conditions, and I would say that if an insulator was used rather than a conductor metal the ice would not be as slippery.

Again, our view changes when we see the effects of the Graviton Cycle and it's relationship with matter as a constant 'tank circuit' source for recharging the spin and toroidal mass fluctuations. Rodin moved off the island and I have not tried to call his old phone number, but if I could talk with him I would attempt to explain how everything changes once you realize that singularities cannot exist and that the big bang never happened. It is logically impossible for his torus model to work with out matter and antimatter induction taking place within forward and reverse time black holes as the driving engines for a graviton cycle creating the necessary flow of energy to create toroidal proton and electron tank circuits.

Tom VanFlandern was a genius and I agree with most of his first approximations in seeing that it is the impacts of Gravitons on MI's that is the cause of mass in motion, and not General Relativity curvature of space around mass. Tom stated that the Graviton travels at a minimum speed of 20 billion times the speed of light. I agree, yet I believe that Graviton's are part of a greater cycle between a forward and reverse time Universe.

Super lens, micro generators using free available graviton energy, is all possible. Once we understand the driving force behind this continuous creation we can then begin to engineer a technological revolution. John

Hi John, as I say I could only watch a few parts of Rodin's lecture. There was some odd stuff though. He says to the engineer who keeps interrupting him, that it's the job of engineers to work out how to get this coil to do anything. Then he shows this little "agreement" that he's drawn up. he generously bequeaths his coil to the world for nothing but he asks for about a third of any profits to be handed over to him. Oh yeah!

What is this thing? It's a current transformer. Every piece of high voltage kit in the world uses current transformers for instrumentation. You see them everywhere on bus bars. The bus bar is a one turn primary winding of the transformer. The secondary winding knockes the voltage down but the current up, there's nothing for nothing.

Flux lines don't cross, so with an ordinarily coil we get a high flux density around the centre of the toroidal core. That density has to pulse the way that the Rodin coil is wound. i honestly don't know where that leads us! is it worth building one? A six turn model wouldn't e difficult to make, a fully wound n turn model would cost money and time.

On the ice thing, there's no melting due to the movement of the skate. The almost bare protons of the ice surface hydrogen atoms have a positive charge, the skates surface electrons have a negative charge, the repulsion of the two makes the ice slippery.

Hi Stoat, I see your point on the ice being slippery due to the differences in charges between electrons and protons. But the breaking of the H2 bond by a current will release heat, take a look at the Naudin MAHG generator experiments with low voltage in 30% hydrogen atmosphere in vacuum tubes that produce 1400 degree Kelvin temperatures. If simply moving metal over frozen H2O generates a current this additional charge could interrupt the gravitomagnetic field [graviton capture] releasing heat. Now atomic hydrogen instantly recombines into molecular hydrogen once current is turned off within a vacuum tube proving the first principles of graviton capture. In other words, gravitons which form the magnetic field around everything carry a negative charge and are also captured by protons. If there is a build up of electrostatic charge generating an electric current from the conductor metal skate passing through a field it will repel the gravitomagnetic field that surrounds atoms [both electrons and gravitons are left hand particles and carry a negative charge] and the breaking of molecular bonds produces heat. Thus, we have a source for free energy and this could also cause ice to melt under the skate.

I think we should build a Rodin coil---eventually. There is no such thing as something for nothing, however if ESA is correct and the gravitomagnetic field is 100 million trillion times stronger than what is predicted by General Relativity---we should be able to design systems to tap this large pool of available energy. Lenz breaking certainly can be defeated, and as you were stating earlier several posts back regarding designing miniature gyroscopes well what about building superconducting gyroscopes that generate free electrons and accelerate because their parts are aligned with this greater force of nature.

Russian replication document of SEG experiment:

www.searleffect.com/free/russianseg/russianseg.htm

Searl proved that the magnetic field which is simply captured gravitons cycling at extreme speeds, can accelerate his SEG [SEARL EFFECT GENERATOR] directly into space producing not only a huge source of free electrical energy but the SEG when spinning above 550 rpm produces an antigravity effect! This was accomplished back in 1946 and yet even today our physics and science is so over conditioned and suppressed that we are still stuck using oil and carbon based fuels. Does the Rodin coil tap this free energy source that is in motion around all matter? Maybe, but one thing is for certain that matter would not exist at all if it were not for the huge gravitomagnetic field generated by incoming gravitons circulating around ecliptic producing back eddy solar systems and generating huge antimatter induction cores at centers of galaxies [that re-radiate out at HFTL antigravitons in an hour glass formation above and below galaxy that head around torus toward reverse time]. Let's redesign technology to tap this unlimited free source of graviton/electron energy. John