Replication Theory:: Fractal Resonance

To get a good view of the overall process that is happening with the electron all the equations have to agree..

E = mc^2 = W/Q;
E*Q = W/1 = W/t = P = V*I = d/t*F = v*F =(a*t)F;
with 1/(V*1)/I = A*1/V = Farad = A*s/V = J/V^2 = C/V = C^2/N*m = s^2*C^2/m^2*kg = s^4*A^2/m^2*kg
so when we plug in the values
Q = 1.602E^-19 Coulomb = e, t = 1,s = 1.
t = time second(s), d = distance in meters, s = seconds
P = Power in Watts, F = force in Newtons, W = work in Joules
A = amps,E in volts, C = Coulomb, V = volts, m = mass
I = Amps, H = inductance in Henry's, Farad = capacitance.
a = acceleration
speed of light is (299792458 Meter)/Second

note P/E = I, Q = I*t, H = V*s/A
so the inductance and capacitance of the electron and positron can now be solved.

so you were right Stoat!, you get cool points on the reciprocal!

now for the answers = mc^2 = E; E*Q = W = P; e = Q = I*s = A*s =A*1 = A; P/I = V
for electron...
Capacitance = A*s/V = 1.95695e-34 farads
Inductance = V*s/A = 5.10999e-33 henrys

and the resonant frequency of the electron is
L = inductance C = capacitance
1/2*Pi*sqroot(L*C) = 1.59155e32 hz

so if that is the frequency of gravity in the electron what is its wave length.

based on the equations above 1/f = 6.28319*10^-33
and in one second that wave becomes (based on quantum mechanics using the speed of light) = 1.88365*10^40

so it looks like the gravity wave emits from in between the magnetic field and the electric field...

I think I need to debate this cosmicsurfer, Stoat.


can any one check this to make sure I got this right?

MARX

Evolivid: 23 Jul 2009 : 18:24:00 <blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">E = mc^2 = W/Q = Q*E = W/1 = W/t = P = E*I = d/t*F = v*F =(a*t)F; with 1/(E*1)/I = A*1/V =
Farad = A*s/V = J/V^2 = C/V = C^2/N*m = s^2*C^2/m^2*kg = s^4*A^2/m^2*kg<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

You lost me at "W/Q". Does "W" represent work? Does Q represent charge?

E = Q*E implies that Q is a dimensionless 1. WRONG!

W/1 = W/t implies that t is a dimensionless 1. WRONG!

If W is work, then W/t is average power. CORRECT! But, to be rigorous, you should say, dW/dt = P.

If P is power, and I is current, then P = E*I tells me that E now represents an electrical potential difference. Potential is energy per unit charge; that is not the same as energy. When you change the meaning of a symbol in your equations, you need to announce that change or switch to another symbol.

d/t*F = v*F? I suppose you mean distance/time = velocity. CORRECT! But again, this is average velocity.

The rest of the above quote is pure gibberish to me. Please try harder to express yourself intelligibly. I can see that you are operating on the same wavelength as Stoat. If you want the rest of us to understand, pretend you're talking to someone who doesn't already know what's in your mind before you say it.




Fractal Foam Model of Universes: Creator

When listing a big equation it would help if you do as the following example:

W = F*D
where:
W = work (in Joules)
F = Force (in Newtons)

Hope this helps
D = Distance (in meters)

Mark Vitrone

Thanxs for your thought on the matter PhilJ

E = mc^2 = W/Q;

Q*E = W = W/1 = W/t = dW/dt = P = V*I = d/t*F = v*F =(a*t)F;

with 1/(V*1)/I = A*1/V = Farad = A*s/V = J/V^2 = C/V = C^2/N*m


I don,t think that dW/dt would make since here cause d = 1 and would be the same as W/t = W/1 = W

do you mean that t cant = 1, does that mean it cant = 2 as well ???
I could put 2 In there as well...

what number would t have to be to not be Dimensionless ?

yes Q = electric charge, W = Work


Q = 1.602E^-19 Coulomb = e &lt;- electric charge
and
t = 1,s = 1,d=1.
I will redue this in a bit this is just a quick post
I will go threw the equation Like Mark V suggested as well
thanks Mark V for your thoughts as well ..

MARX

Hi Marx, a quick question. this is a tank circuit with a cycle of about 8E-21 yeah? is there any resistance in this circuit at all?

Hey Stoat,

I dont think there is any resistance, but that's a good point since V/A = R
voltage/Amperage = Resistance
Power/Amperage^2 = Resistance
you would think that there would have to be ....
the resistance in that since resembles the inductance which is really reactance that's
viewed as impedance which is like resistance

and in order for the system to be in resonance then the reactance of the capacitance has to equal the reactance of the inductance.

but that dependes on the frequency as well as capacitance and inductance

XC = 1/2Pi(fFarads)= capacitive reactance

XL = 2Pi(fL) = inductive reactance


MARX