- Thank you received: 0
Replication Theory:: Fractal Resonance
15 years 6 months ago #23482
by evolivid
Reply from Mark Baker was created by evolivid
check out these calculations i have been doing...
Remember 2187 electrons and positrons in threes!
electron = e
positron = p
epe pep epe
pep epe pep = 1
epe pep epe
pep epe pep
epe pep epe = 2
pep epe pep
121 212 121
212 121 212 = V refined upquark
121 212 121
212 121 212
121 212 121 = W refined downquark
212 121 212
proton = WVW
antiproton = VWV
2187 total electrons and positrons
2187 / 3 = 729
e(p)e p(e)p e(p)e
p(e)p e(p)e p(e)p
e(p)e p(e)p e(p)e <---- just the center masses
use the center with the reduced mass equation = 729 electrons or positrons =
massA * mass B(massA + massB)^-1
ElectronMass = 9.10938215`*10^-31
(9.10938215`*10^-31 )*(9.10938215`*10^-31 )*(9.10938215`*10^-31 +
9.10938215`*10^-31 )^-1 = 4.5546910750000005*10^-31
"here is the reduced mass of the electron" = 4.5546910750000005*10^-31
*********************************************************************
"this is the reduced mass electron times 729 , so the center e(p)e electorns and positrons only have a reduced mass"
1. 4.5546910750000005`*10^31*729 = 3.320369793675001*10^-28
*********************************************************************
"the rest of the electrons and positrons have a normal mass"
"shown here"
2. 729 - 2187 = 1458
*********************************************************************
"total mass of all the normal masses"
3. 1458*9.10938215`*10^-31 = 1.3281479174700001*10^-27
********************************************************************
"this is the reduced center masses plus the normal masses"
4. (1.3281479174700001`*10^-27) + (3.320369793675001`*^-28 )
> = 1.6601848968375004*10^-27 <-- replicated structure ! <---
*******************************************************************
"the Mathematics are almost exact here!"
theory Mass replicated = 1.6601848968375004*10^-27
ProtonMass ========== 1.672621637*10^-27
********************************************************************
This is very close here and I think is a real breakthrough for this theory !!
MARX
MARX
Remember 2187 electrons and positrons in threes!
electron = e
positron = p
epe pep epe
pep epe pep = 1
epe pep epe
pep epe pep
epe pep epe = 2
pep epe pep
121 212 121
212 121 212 = V refined upquark
121 212 121
212 121 212
121 212 121 = W refined downquark
212 121 212
proton = WVW
antiproton = VWV
2187 total electrons and positrons
2187 / 3 = 729
e(p)e p(e)p e(p)e
p(e)p e(p)e p(e)p
e(p)e p(e)p e(p)e <---- just the center masses
use the center with the reduced mass equation = 729 electrons or positrons =
massA * mass B(massA + massB)^-1
ElectronMass = 9.10938215`*10^-31
(9.10938215`*10^-31 )*(9.10938215`*10^-31 )*(9.10938215`*10^-31 +
9.10938215`*10^-31 )^-1 = 4.5546910750000005*10^-31
"here is the reduced mass of the electron" = 4.5546910750000005*10^-31
*********************************************************************
"this is the reduced mass electron times 729 , so the center e(p)e electorns and positrons only have a reduced mass"
1. 4.5546910750000005`*10^31*729 = 3.320369793675001*10^-28
*********************************************************************
"the rest of the electrons and positrons have a normal mass"
"shown here"
2. 729 - 2187 = 1458
*********************************************************************
"total mass of all the normal masses"
3. 1458*9.10938215`*10^-31 = 1.3281479174700001*10^-27
********************************************************************
"this is the reduced center masses plus the normal masses"
4. (1.3281479174700001`*10^-27) + (3.320369793675001`*^-28 )
> = 1.6601848968375004*10^-27 <-- replicated structure ! <---
*******************************************************************
"the Mathematics are almost exact here!"
theory Mass replicated = 1.6601848968375004*10^-27
ProtonMass ========== 1.672621637*10^-27
********************************************************************
This is very close here and I think is a real breakthrough for this theory !!
MARX
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 6 months ago #23411
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
here is some food for thought tho on how I will be deriving the motion energy's involved
because the system described on the other page is just the rest Mass of the system
I still have to describe the nuclear motion
and the electronic motion that will add to the mass
So i will simulate the model as if all the electrons and positrons
just appeared in this type of configuration ... and I believe that is the best way to simulate it since then the simulation will have real meaning not just pre-plotted courses , then the physics can take over.
if you look at the (Neutron Mass - Proton Mass)= [epe]
ProtonMass = 1.6726231*10^-27
NeutronMass = 1.6749286*10^-27
(Neutron Mass - Proton Mass)= 2.3055*10^-30
2.3055*10^-30 - (9.1093897*10^-31) - (9.1093897*10^-31) = 4.8362206*10^-31
*Reduced Electron Mass = 4.55469485*10^-31
(4.55469485*10^-31)-(4.862206*10^-31) = Motion Energy
So if this theory is correct then the Motion energy should be LESS THAN 2.8152575*10^-32
this is A little high based on the projected Proton energy motion of 2.02243*10^-32 per each 729
of 2187 or (1.47435*10^-29 Total)
this is because just one of the "Quarks" the center one is changed form
pep epe pep
epe pep epe = 2 of V
pep epe pep
to
pep epe pep
epe(pep)epe = 2 of V = V`
(((((epe))))
pep epe pep
so that V has more repulsion going on then a normal V
which is = to (2.8152575*10^-32 - 2.02243*10^-32)
So granted that the overall repulsions makes the mass look like there is both the epe and the pep in the center,
the overall forces could make the neutron 2 of V able to do that
because of the overall forces acting inward toward the center
Geometrically this could decay into a proton as you can see!
That will be determined by the Mathematics of physics tho
so I will be testing this theory shortly to determine if my thoughts are correct by simulating it.
ElectronMass = 9.1093897*10^-31
ElectronMass + ElectronMass + Reduced ElectronMass = (Neutron Mass - Proton Mass)
Reduced ElectronMass = (Mass a * Mass b)*(Mass a + Mass b)^-1
NOTE BY SAYING REDUCED ELECTRON MASS I ALSO MEAN REDUCED POSITRON MASS -- FOR THE CENTER
electron or positron in [e(p)e] or [p(e)p]
you can take a look at the Animated simulation of epe at
the code for Mathematica 6.3 is
Animate[Graphics[{Circle[], Point[{.43*Cos[t 4 - Pi], -.43*Sin[t ]}], Point[{-.43*Cos[t 4 - Pi], .43*Sin[t ]}], Point[{-.02*Cos[t 4 ], -.02*Sin[t ]}]}], {t, -11, Infinity^11}]
MARX
MARX
because the system described on the other page is just the rest Mass of the system
I still have to describe the nuclear motion
and the electronic motion that will add to the mass
So i will simulate the model as if all the electrons and positrons
just appeared in this type of configuration ... and I believe that is the best way to simulate it since then the simulation will have real meaning not just pre-plotted courses , then the physics can take over.
if you look at the (Neutron Mass - Proton Mass)= [epe]
ProtonMass = 1.6726231*10^-27
NeutronMass = 1.6749286*10^-27
(Neutron Mass - Proton Mass)= 2.3055*10^-30
2.3055*10^-30 - (9.1093897*10^-31) - (9.1093897*10^-31) = 4.8362206*10^-31
*Reduced Electron Mass = 4.55469485*10^-31
(4.55469485*10^-31)-(4.862206*10^-31) = Motion Energy
So if this theory is correct then the Motion energy should be LESS THAN 2.8152575*10^-32
this is A little high based on the projected Proton energy motion of 2.02243*10^-32 per each 729
of 2187 or (1.47435*10^-29 Total)
this is because just one of the "Quarks" the center one is changed form
pep epe pep
epe pep epe = 2 of V
pep epe pep
to
pep epe pep
epe(pep)epe = 2 of V = V`
(((((epe))))
pep epe pep
so that V has more repulsion going on then a normal V
which is = to (2.8152575*10^-32 - 2.02243*10^-32)
So granted that the overall repulsions makes the mass look like there is both the epe and the pep in the center,
the overall forces could make the neutron 2 of V able to do that
because of the overall forces acting inward toward the center
Geometrically this could decay into a proton as you can see!
That will be determined by the Mathematics of physics tho
so I will be testing this theory shortly to determine if my thoughts are correct by simulating it.
ElectronMass = 9.1093897*10^-31
ElectronMass + ElectronMass + Reduced ElectronMass = (Neutron Mass - Proton Mass)
Reduced ElectronMass = (Mass a * Mass b)*(Mass a + Mass b)^-1
NOTE BY SAYING REDUCED ELECTRON MASS I ALSO MEAN REDUCED POSITRON MASS -- FOR THE CENTER
electron or positron in [e(p)e] or [p(e)p]
you can take a look at the Animated simulation of epe at
the code for Mathematica 6.3 is
Animate[Graphics[{Circle[], Point[{.43*Cos[t 4 - Pi], -.43*Sin[t ]}], Point[{-.43*Cos[t 4 - Pi], .43*Sin[t ]}], Point[{-.02*Cos[t 4 ], -.02*Sin[t ]}]}], {t, -11, Infinity^11}]
MARX
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 6 months ago #23483
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
here is some of what is involved in simulating this replication theory
epe pep epe
pep epe pep 1
epe pep epe
pep epe pep
epe pep epe 2
pep epe pep
pep epe pep
epe pep epe 3
----epe
pep epe pep
epe pep epe
pep epe pep 4
----pep
epe pep epe
121 212 121
212 121 212 V
121 212 121
212 121 212
121 212 121 W
212 121 212
121 212 121
212 131 212 V`
121 212 121
212 121 212
121 242 121 W`
212 121 212
Proton WVW
AntiProton VWV
Neutron W(V`)W
AntiNeutron V(W`)V
1)
x
||||||||||||||| |
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| epe
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
2)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| epe
||||||||||||||||| pep
||||||||||||||||| epe
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
3)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| epe pep epe
||||||||||||||||| pep epe pep
||||||||||||||||| epe pep epe
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
4)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| 121
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
5)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| 121
||||||||||||||||| 212
||||||||||||||||| 121
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
6)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| 121 212 121
||||||||||||||||| 212 121 212
||||||||||||||||| 121 212 121
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
7)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| WVW
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
This is how the simulation will be done cause I have to do it in layers like this nested
and correctly describe how each one should work then I have to describe how
they all influence each other and refine the model
1.I will indeed make two physics simulations, how I think it should work
2. and what happens when I just plug in the physics and let it do what it will do
when this configuration instantly appears
*********************************************************************
This does look like in order to replicate this in reality you would
have to start from the outer shell inward which semms impossable
unless you could teleport the electrons and positrons!
********************************************************************
MARX
MARX
epe pep epe
pep epe pep 1
epe pep epe
pep epe pep
epe pep epe 2
pep epe pep
pep epe pep
epe pep epe 3
----epe
pep epe pep
epe pep epe
pep epe pep 4
----pep
epe pep epe
121 212 121
212 121 212 V
121 212 121
212 121 212
121 212 121 W
212 121 212
121 212 121
212 131 212 V`
121 212 121
212 121 212
121 242 121 W`
212 121 212
Proton WVW
AntiProton VWV
Neutron W(V`)W
AntiNeutron V(W`)V
1)
x
||||||||||||||| |
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| epe
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
2)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| epe
||||||||||||||||| pep
||||||||||||||||| epe
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
3)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| epe pep epe
||||||||||||||||| pep epe pep
||||||||||||||||| epe pep epe
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
4)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| 121
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
5)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| 121
||||||||||||||||| 212
||||||||||||||||| 121
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
6)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| 121 212 121
||||||||||||||||| 212 121 212
||||||||||||||||| 121 212 121
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
7)
x
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| WVW
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||
y
///////////////////
//////////////////
/////////////////
////////////////
///////////////
z
This is how the simulation will be done cause I have to do it in layers like this nested
and correctly describe how each one should work then I have to describe how
they all influence each other and refine the model
1.I will indeed make two physics simulations, how I think it should work
2. and what happens when I just plug in the physics and let it do what it will do
when this configuration instantly appears
*********************************************************************
This does look like in order to replicate this in reality you would
have to start from the outer shell inward which semms impossable
unless you could teleport the electrons and positrons!
********************************************************************
MARX
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 6 months ago #22827
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by evolivid</i>
<br />discussion on the simulation model of Replication
and the Gravitational forces in a proton , anti-proton, neutron, anti-neutron
resonant frequency = 1/(2*Pi*(square root inductance * capacitance))
right now I'm working on the electronic motion
of the geometric system. with (epe = capacitor inductor capacitor)
in parallel and visa versa for(pep)
so the question is what is the capacitance of the electron and the inductance of the positron ? ..
from that answer we could measure Mathematically the speed of the Gravitational FLUX.
So It would make since to me that the "resonant frequency" should have something to do with the speed of gravity, at such a small level
inside the model of the Proton described here, meaning the applied frequency at the smallest level would be linked to the "Gravitational FLUX" holding the mater together.. and acting like a tank circuit
"A parallel Tank circuit with a Capacitor and inductor "
I will post a video of how this little circuit can provide an infinite amount of current forever.. explaining the perpetual motion of the inertia of the Proton.
Please give your thoughts on a possible Gravitational theory derived from the mathematics presented here
after all E = E
MARX
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
The fields are 1. Gravitomagnetic field, 2. Magnetic field, 3. Electric field/>>>electron motion is attached to G Field by a vortex. I think that there is a reverse motion positron that takes a discharge each time it passes electron [twice per rotation] taking extra heat from circuit and discharges it up through the antgraviton vortex. The exit wave is very cold and that is why high speed free energy motion using magnets results in antigraviton production (reverse time wave)---spinning magnets get very cold to touch. The gravitons circulate downwards around vertical axis forming the gravitomagnetic field which increases in horizontal size with increased rotation.
The exiting antigraviton creates the G-Force effect. It is repulsive to matter and high speed motion will hit this force field causing a buffeting effect and drag at high G motions. Rotating magnetic fields increase production of antigravitons creating lift and shielding against G-Forces. Let me know when you have your simulation up and working. John
<br />discussion on the simulation model of Replication
and the Gravitational forces in a proton , anti-proton, neutron, anti-neutron
resonant frequency = 1/(2*Pi*(square root inductance * capacitance))
right now I'm working on the electronic motion
of the geometric system. with (epe = capacitor inductor capacitor)
in parallel and visa versa for(pep)
so the question is what is the capacitance of the electron and the inductance of the positron ? ..
from that answer we could measure Mathematically the speed of the Gravitational FLUX.
So It would make since to me that the "resonant frequency" should have something to do with the speed of gravity, at such a small level
inside the model of the Proton described here, meaning the applied frequency at the smallest level would be linked to the "Gravitational FLUX" holding the mater together.. and acting like a tank circuit
"A parallel Tank circuit with a Capacitor and inductor "
I will post a video of how this little circuit can provide an infinite amount of current forever.. explaining the perpetual motion of the inertia of the Proton.
Please give your thoughts on a possible Gravitational theory derived from the mathematics presented here
after all E = E
MARX
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
The fields are 1. Gravitomagnetic field, 2. Magnetic field, 3. Electric field/>>>electron motion is attached to G Field by a vortex. I think that there is a reverse motion positron that takes a discharge each time it passes electron [twice per rotation] taking extra heat from circuit and discharges it up through the antgraviton vortex. The exit wave is very cold and that is why high speed free energy motion using magnets results in antigraviton production (reverse time wave)---spinning magnets get very cold to touch. The gravitons circulate downwards around vertical axis forming the gravitomagnetic field which increases in horizontal size with increased rotation.
The exiting antigraviton creates the G-Force effect. It is repulsive to matter and high speed motion will hit this force field causing a buffeting effect and drag at high G motions. Rotating magnetic fields increase production of antigravitons creating lift and shielding against G-Forces. Let me know when you have your simulation up and working. John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 6 months ago #23484
by evolivid
I found some links on the capacitance of the electron
physics.nist.gov/Divisions/Div842/Gp2/Setg/PDFs/APL_95.pdf
www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0268-1242/14/12/327
arxiv.org/ftp/cond-mat/papers/0412/0412240.pdf
electron.mit.edu/papers/1999_01_Single-e...ctron_transistor.pdf
www.princeton.edu/~chouweb/choubio_papers/SET.pdf
www.nd.edu/~qcahome/pdf/nd/Bistable_satu...tunnel_junctions.pdf
hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/16/69/91/PDF/1006.pdf
MARX
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
I found some links on the capacitance of the electron
physics.nist.gov/Divisions/Div842/Gp2/Setg/PDFs/APL_95.pdf
www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0268-1242/14/12/327
arxiv.org/ftp/cond-mat/papers/0412/0412240.pdf
electron.mit.edu/papers/1999_01_Single-e...ctron_transistor.pdf
www.princeton.edu/~chouweb/choubio_papers/SET.pdf
www.nd.edu/~qcahome/pdf/nd/Bistable_satu...tunnel_junctions.pdf
hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/16/69/91/PDF/1006.pdf
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 5 months ago #15176
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
In the calculation of the capacitance of the electron we use
c1 * c2
= cT total capacitance
c1 + c2
to get the the resonant frequency
or the frequency of the gravity in an epe system (the pep is a little different)
from which we can calculate the speed of Gravity theoretically
so now I need to search for the average inductance of the positron
then we have 1/2*pi*(square root of)cT*L = resonant frequency
This model will help to make a simpler and more detailed and faster
simulation program because we are working from the base mathematics
from which all the other mathematics rely on ... which means all the complicated
movements are automatically found in the atom of the molecule of the cell
that makes reactions with other cells or devices.
MARX
c1 * c2
= cT total capacitance
c1 + c2
to get the the resonant frequency
or the frequency of the gravity in an epe system (the pep is a little different)
from which we can calculate the speed of Gravity theoretically
so now I need to search for the average inductance of the positron
then we have 1/2*pi*(square root of)cT*L = resonant frequency
This model will help to make a simpler and more detailed and faster
simulation program because we are working from the base mathematics
from which all the other mathematics rely on ... which means all the complicated
movements are automatically found in the atom of the molecule of the cell
that makes reactions with other cells or devices.
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.335 seconds