- Thank you received: 0
CBR has the answer
18 years 10 months ago #17292
by Harry
Replied by Harry on topic Reply from Harry Costas
Ryan said
"Harry you may be right that the universe is an ocean without boundried universes, but if I hypothesize differently it shouldn't be sweat off either of our shoulders."
Smile,,,,,,,,,your right but for the BO!!!!!!!!!!.
thebobgy
said! what?
Harry
"Harry you may be right that the universe is an ocean without boundried universes, but if I hypothesize differently it shouldn't be sweat off either of our shoulders."
Smile,,,,,,,,,your right but for the BO!!!!!!!!!!.
thebobgy
said! what?
Harry
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 10 months ago #14559
by Ryan2006
Replied by Ryan2006 on topic Reply from ryan Henningsgaard
Harry what is BO? and Thebobgy was talking with Tom Flandern about foreverism and creationism. Sir Isaac Newton said in one of the laws of physics that you can not create or destroy enegry/matter leaving the big bang out of the question according to faith of religion or faith of a creator. Did you know that Newton created calculus?
ryan Henningsgaard
ryan Henningsgaard
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 10 months ago #14569
by thebobgy
Replied by thebobgy on topic Reply from Robert (Bob) Smith
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Harry</i>
<br />thebobgy said! what?
Harry
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
You are being disingenuous Harry, you ignored my message to you and then concern yourself with my post to someone else. If you did not comprehend my message to tvf why not just pass it by; why the feeble attempt at sarcasm?............Harry!
<br />thebobgy said! what?
Harry
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
You are being disingenuous Harry, you ignored my message to you and then concern yourself with my post to someone else. If you did not comprehend my message to tvf why not just pass it by; why the feeble attempt at sarcasm?............Harry!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 10 months ago #14570
by Harry
Replied by Harry on topic Reply from Harry Costas
Sorry thebobgy.
THere was nothing that i could add I thought that you were responding to "Reply to original post by tvanflandern on,,,,"
as for sweat,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,BO goes with it,,,,,,,,,,,body odour,,,,,,,we need to smile and have fun with it,,,,,,,sometimes.
Harry
THere was nothing that i could add I thought that you were responding to "Reply to original post by tvanflandern on,,,,"
as for sweat,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,BO goes with it,,,,,,,,,,,body odour,,,,,,,we need to smile and have fun with it,,,,,,,sometimes.
Harry
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 10 months ago #14587
by thebobgy
Replied by thebobgy on topic Reply from Robert (Bob) Smith
Tom,
This a followup message to my exchange to you on 12 Jan 2006: at 13:15:26 in which I stated that I was going to give the subject some serious thought, and I did. Also, in an exchange with you on 05 Jan 2006: at 10:18:52, I made the statement; “if I had to make a decision, re; my original question, I would choose foreverism”. A recall of past events have given me a preponderance of evidence that your version as to the existence of the universe as having always existed is correct. I therefor concede the discussion to you and I hope I have not in-convinced you in any way, I have found our discussions most informative. I did have some observations on your Valles Marineris article but that is for another time. Again, thank you for your time.
Thebobgy
This a followup message to my exchange to you on 12 Jan 2006: at 13:15:26 in which I stated that I was going to give the subject some serious thought, and I did. Also, in an exchange with you on 05 Jan 2006: at 10:18:52, I made the statement; “if I had to make a decision, re; my original question, I would choose foreverism”. A recall of past events have given me a preponderance of evidence that your version as to the existence of the universe as having always existed is correct. I therefor concede the discussion to you and I hope I have not in-convinced you in any way, I have found our discussions most informative. I did have some observations on your Valles Marineris article but that is for another time. Again, thank you for your time.
Thebobgy
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 10 months ago #17300
by Skarp
Replied by Skarp on topic Reply from jim jim
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">
I made the statement; “if I had to make a decision, re; my original question, I would choose foreverism”. A recall of past events have given me a preponderance of evidence that your version as to the existence of the universe as having always existed is correct.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Keep in mind that the universe will never be understood with this line of reasoning, and your life is meaningless in the infinite sea.
I made the statement; “if I had to make a decision, re; my original question, I would choose foreverism”. A recall of past events have given me a preponderance of evidence that your version as to the existence of the universe as having always existed is correct.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Keep in mind that the universe will never be understood with this line of reasoning, and your life is meaningless in the infinite sea.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.184 seconds