- Thank you received: 0
My pareidolia knows no bounds.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
10 years 1 month ago #22537
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />Another reasonable person might conclude that even though it is an interesting image it is, most likely, an illusion of one sort or another. That same reasonable person would withhold judgement until additional evidence was available.
Just like she does for most of the other images that are on display here.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Sorry Larry, I don't follow. Are you saying a reasonable person may reason this figure to be a "natural phenomenon"?
Malcolm Scott
<br />Another reasonable person might conclude that even though it is an interesting image it is, most likely, an illusion of one sort or another. That same reasonable person would withhold judgement until additional evidence was available.
Just like she does for most of the other images that are on display here.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Sorry Larry, I don't follow. Are you saying a reasonable person may reason this figure to be a "natural phenomenon"?
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 1 month ago #22669
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />Another reasonable person might conclude that even though it is an interesting image it is, most likely, an illusion of one sort or another. That same reasonable person would withhold judgement until additional evidence was available.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Right. What is the alternative? That it's a Rodin style "The Thinker" statue sitting on the side of a hill in that God forsaken landscape? Or perhaps it's a real Martian lady sitting there with her right knee bent inward in Cindi Lauper fashion just passing the time, waiting for the spaceship to pass over and snap her picture?
She is a good one, though.
rd
<br />Another reasonable person might conclude that even though it is an interesting image it is, most likely, an illusion of one sort or another. That same reasonable person would withhold judgement until additional evidence was available.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Right. What is the alternative? That it's a Rodin style "The Thinker" statue sitting on the side of a hill in that God forsaken landscape? Or perhaps it's a real Martian lady sitting there with her right knee bent inward in Cindi Lauper fashion just passing the time, waiting for the spaceship to pass over and snap her picture?
She is a good one, though.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 month ago #22719
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
<b>[Marsevidence01] "Sorry Larry, I don't follow."</b>
That's OK, I'm not leading.
That's OK, I'm not leading.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 month ago #23309
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />Another reasonable person might conclude that even though it is an interesting image it is, most likely, an illusion of one sort or another. That same reasonable person would withhold judgement until additional evidence was available.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Right. What is the alternative? That it's a Rodin style "The Thinker" statue sitting on the side of a hill in that God forsaken landscape? Or perhaps it's a real Martian lady sitting there with her right knee bent inward in Cindi Lauper fashion just passing the time, waiting for the spaceship to pass over and snap her picture?
She is a good one, though.
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Well the way I see it is, there are two ways to look at this....
1. Try to find a plausible explanation that could culminate in the possibility that this in NOT an alien concoction and is somehow a natural phenomenon?
2. Try to get one's head around the probable fact that we have a 30 meter high alien rendition of a half human....half "something" that seems to be perched on a rather strange backdrop.
Would there be a third alternative?
And yes, by all observations, the image does appear to be female...not sure why that is though?
Btw, My wife made an interesting observation (a female thing I think)....she commented that "she gave her the impression that she is somewhat sad"
Malcolm Scott
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />Another reasonable person might conclude that even though it is an interesting image it is, most likely, an illusion of one sort or another. That same reasonable person would withhold judgement until additional evidence was available.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Right. What is the alternative? That it's a Rodin style "The Thinker" statue sitting on the side of a hill in that God forsaken landscape? Or perhaps it's a real Martian lady sitting there with her right knee bent inward in Cindi Lauper fashion just passing the time, waiting for the spaceship to pass over and snap her picture?
She is a good one, though.
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Well the way I see it is, there are two ways to look at this....
1. Try to find a plausible explanation that could culminate in the possibility that this in NOT an alien concoction and is somehow a natural phenomenon?
2. Try to get one's head around the probable fact that we have a 30 meter high alien rendition of a half human....half "something" that seems to be perched on a rather strange backdrop.
Would there be a third alternative?
And yes, by all observations, the image does appear to be female...not sure why that is though?
Btw, My wife made an interesting observation (a female thing I think)....she commented that "she gave her the impression that she is somewhat sad"
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 month ago #23310
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
Btw, My wife made an interesting observation (a female thing I think)....she commented that "she gave her the impression that she is somewhat sad"
When we get around to it, we should take a look at another "manifestation/thing" close by or is that too soon?
Malcolm Scott
When we get around to it, we should take a look at another "manifestation/thing" close by or is that too soon?
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 1 month ago #22538
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
Just so you know chaps, there's much more to this than meets the eye and I have a theory...it's a pretty loaded one though. Perhaps I better wait.
Malcolm Scott
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.436 seconds