- Thank you received: 0
Faces from the Chasmas
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
16 years 9 months ago #18629
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Now I believe.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Cute, but as I've been trying to explain to the pareidiliac guys for the past two years, it's real important to be able to verify sources of raw data images. The image provenance must be reliable and provable, otherwise, we don't know what we're looking at, really.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Cute, but as I've been trying to explain to the pareidiliac guys for the past two years, it's real important to be able to verify sources of raw data images. The image provenance must be reliable and provable, otherwise, we don't know what we're looking at, really.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 years 9 months ago #19925
by Trinket
Replied by Trinket on topic Reply from Bob
Happy New year all
Believe ,, yes you do.. just what exactly is the question..
40mb version
origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/...WestValley_L257F.jpg
Believe ,, yes you do.. just what exactly is the question..
40mb version
origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/...WestValley_L257F.jpg
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 years 9 months ago #18631
by jrich
Replied by jrich on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by neilderosa</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Now I believe.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Cute, but as I've been trying to explain to the pareidiliac guys for the past two years, it's real important to be able to verify sources of raw data images. The image provenance must be reliable and provable, otherwise, we don't know what we're looking at, really.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Why would NASA fake a Bigfoot on Mars?
JR
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Now I believe.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Cute, but as I've been trying to explain to the pareidiliac guys for the past two years, it's real important to be able to verify sources of raw data images. The image provenance must be reliable and provable, otherwise, we don't know what we're looking at, really.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Why would NASA fake a Bigfoot on Mars?
JR
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 years 9 months ago #20647
by Trinket
Replied by Trinket on topic Reply from Bob
the "bigfoot looking" sculptured item is quite literally the only reality that was detected in that panoramic Image.. I just find that comical...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 9 months ago #19926
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
First, my apologies to jrich, I spoke too soon.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">The "alien" is actually a blurry detail in a huge panoramic photograph snapped on the edge of Mars' Gusev crater by NASA's Spirit rover in early November, and posted on NASA's Web site on Jan. 2.
www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,324800,00.html
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
These images place the new find on more serious footing than Fox does. I'm guestimating that judging from the distance from the rover, perhaps 50-200 feet, the statue is 1-4 feet high. [Neil DeRosa]
Venus statue in context image reduced
Statue indicated with red circles on left of image
Statue at 100% (5mb image)
Statue at 400% (5mb image)
Statue at 1000% (5mb image)
And here is an 1000% enlargement from the link provided by trinket (40mb image)
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">The "alien" is actually a blurry detail in a huge panoramic photograph snapped on the edge of Mars' Gusev crater by NASA's Spirit rover in early November, and posted on NASA's Web site on Jan. 2.
www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,324800,00.html
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
These images place the new find on more serious footing than Fox does. I'm guestimating that judging from the distance from the rover, perhaps 50-200 feet, the statue is 1-4 feet high. [Neil DeRosa]
Venus statue in context image reduced
Statue indicated with red circles on left of image
Statue at 100% (5mb image)
Statue at 400% (5mb image)
Statue at 1000% (5mb image)
And here is an 1000% enlargement from the link provided by trinket (40mb image)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 years 9 months ago #20518
by jrich
Replied by jrich on topic Reply from
Neil,
Congratulations. You've taken a parody of your work and done it one better...<i>self</i>-parody.
JR
Congratulations. You've taken a parody of your work and done it one better...<i>self</i>-parody.
JR
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.418 seconds