The implications of finding absolute proof.

Context is everything. And order.

Malcolm, note definition <b>Number 6.</b> That's the one I'm using. There is nothing ad-hominem about that, although I will admit it's not actually a compliment.

(Possibly 1 and 3 also, but maybe not.)


fantasy
n. pl. fantasies
1. The creative imagination; unrestrained fancy. See Synonyms at imagination.
2. Something, such as an invention, that is a creation of the fancy.
3. A capricious or fantastic idea; a conceit.
4.
a. Fiction characterized by highly fanciful or supernatural elements.
b. An example of such fiction.
5. An imagined event or sequence of mental images, such as a daydream, usually fulfilling a wish or psychological need.
<b>***6. An unrealistic or improbable supposition.***This one!</b>
7. Music See fantasia.
8. A coin issued especially by a questionable authority and not intended for use as currency.
9. Obsolete A hallucination.

rd

There is also nothing ad-hominem about this:

Pay particular attention to Number 4 and the list of uses.

Full Definition of RELIGION

1
a : the state of a religious &lt;a nun in her 20th year of religion&gt;
b (1) : the service and worship of God or the supernatural (2) : commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance

2
: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices

3
archaic : scrupulous conformity : conscientiousness

<b>***4
: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith***This one. </b>

religionless adjective
See religion defined for English-language learners
See religion defined for kids

Examples of RELIGION

Many people turn to religion for comfort in a time of crisis.
There are many religions, such as Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism.
Shinto is a religion that is unique to Japan.
Hockey is a religion in Canada.
Politics are a religion to him.
Where I live, high school football is religion.
Food is religion in this house.

rd

<b>[Malcolm] "Look if you want me off this forum, just come out and say it ok?"</b>

Despite our extremely open minded approach to what comprises science, this is at the end of the day a SCIENTIFIC website.

We will let you show us almost anything.

And we will let you say almost anything in defense of what you have shown us.

But sooner or later you have to actually produce something astounding (if that is what you claimed you had).

You have in fact made that claim (on many occasions). So far you have produced nothing.

***

I don't <u>want</u> you to leave. But you actually are wasting a lot of time - ours as well as yours.

My preference is that you actually show us something that is important. I just don't think (based on your performance to date) that you can.

***

PLEASE prove me wrong.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br /><b>[Malcolm] "Look if you want me off this forum, just come out and say it ok?"</b>

Despite our extremely open minded approach to what comprises science, this is at the end of the day a SCIENTIFIC website.

We will let you show us almost anything.

And we will let you say almost anything in defense of what you have shown us.

But sooner or later you have to actually produce something astounding (if that is what you claimed you had).

You have in fact made that claim (on many occasions). So far you have produced nothing.

***

I don't <u>want</u> you to leave. But you actually are wasting a lot of time - ours as well as yours.

My preference is that you actually show us something that is important. I just don't think (based on your performance to date) that you can.

***

PLEASE prove me wrong.


<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Thank you for your words of encouragement Larry.

I have shown the forum some incredible images of a discovery which I made in the files ESP_013772_1795 and ESP_022910_1795 of unkown landscape with a rich assortment of artifacts I feel are worthy of discussion. Is this not consistent with Meta Research?

How can this be wasting everyone's time?

If this is not congruent with "Artificial structures on Mars" then please advise me what is?

Thanks,

Malcolm Scott

<i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>

"although I will admit it's not actually a compliment".

Then try finding one, it will be more becoming.



Malcolm Scott