- Thank you received: 0
Planetary accretion?
- tvanflandern
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
18 years 1 month ago #19009
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Stoat</i>
<br />Is "Bode"s law" a law now then?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">It has a theoretical basis. But the exact form it takes will not necessarily be the same in other planetary systems, or even in our own in widely different parts of the solar system. For example, fission theory argues that mass ratios between twin planet pairs of 0.8 and distance ratios of 1.59 are the most natural, but may later get disrupted by planet explosion events. -|Tom|-
<br />Is "Bode"s law" a law now then?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">It has a theoretical basis. But the exact form it takes will not necessarily be the same in other planetary systems, or even in our own in widely different parts of the solar system. For example, fission theory argues that mass ratios between twin planet pairs of 0.8 and distance ratios of 1.59 are the most natural, but may later get disrupted by planet explosion events. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 1 month ago #17716
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
When I was a kid, I thought it was the bee's knees but I never did send of the letter claiming my two planets [][] Note that I wasn't greedy[] Then I discovered that I "owned" several billion stars, and gave up on Bode as being small beer stuff[8D] I'm not greatly impressed by him, one step up from being a Dan Brownite, is how I see it.[}]
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.345 seconds