Neural Geometry

Giving up a neural axiom is not enough; you must also give up the vocabulary associated with that particular axiom. Coping with this apparent deficit forces your thoughts to reconstruct what is missing without reference to the axiom or the vocabulary. This has the effect of creating new axiom(s) and associated vocabulary.

The reason for doing this in the first place can be found in the topic post. Neural axioms are difficult to give up but not impossible.

Duane Brown

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by DWB</i>
&gt; Neural axioms are difficult to give up but not impossible.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Hmmm ... let's see if I understand; are you suggesting that the 13 hours I spent in the air flying home from Hawaii was totally unnecessary?

shando:

Please refer to the topic post (the first one).

Duane Brown

?

I'd procrastinate, but I can't seem to find the time

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by DWB</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Mac</i>
<br />DWB,

a concept of space which permitted the things I see and that science and others see.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Mac:

Please understand, I developed a geometry without points. The consequences of that are far reaching.... no distance, and no motion.

It's not that I question everything I see.

Duane Brown

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

This is a test