Absolute emptiness

<b></b>another 'nothingness' recognised <b></b>

yes, the mathematical theorists, are 'creating' more
subjective sub-sub-atomic components of particles
every week !!

"the important feature of this <u></u>new particle<u></u>
is it's <i></i>narrow width<i></i>,which is very
different from that of conventional MESON - -
[the composite of Quark-anti-Quark]"

<reveal new resonance states>
in the Quantum Chromodynamics Theory, after analyzing
58 million cases of J particle...

long address: english.peopledaily.com.cn/200307/31/eng20030731_121271.shtml

++++++++++++ ++++++~~~~~~~~~ ++~~~~~~~++++

these virtual (theoretical particles) that only exist in the minds
of the mathematicians [according to some scientists] are expressions
of the void/vacuum/nothingness, which we are attempting to grasp.


<b></b>mac & PoPpA<b></b> among others, have thought patterns I can
relate to...a somewhat evolved & revamped Vedic Cosmology model...

the way i view the big picture is it's like an hour-glass...
nothingness>.<matter universe
the mystic & magic adage: AS ABOVE SO IT IS BELOW..applies here too
in all the observable-material universe/cosmos all that is manifested

so it is in the 'nothing' 'void' 'vacuum'

the dot of our graphic: NOTYET>> . <<ISNOW :that dot is the '0'point
and to mans mind the start of time/space/matter are the elementry
Particles, you know..electron, proton, nutron, etc etc

which makes these frequencies & resonances (otherwise abberations)
in the mathematical continium, outstanding enoughto require an
identity or name; ie Quark, meson, et al....'they are products of
the nothing universe'...in our mind a potentiality made manifest.

anyways, thats scratching the surface about how i view IT
just an opinion...i dont wish to evangelize or defend or proove...

enjoy the journey........s/riff-raff


enjoy the journey

<img src=icon_smile_dead.gif border=0 align=middle>

Chaos or sabotage attacked my last post=

graphic should be:

NOTHINGNESS> . <MATERIAL COSMOS

also:

NOTYET> . <ISNOW

<b></b>BUT< OF COURSE THE CONTINUITY IS GONE >
you will have lost the essence of the post<b></b>

enjoy the journey

<u></u>THE CONTINUITY IS GONE>>>but<b></b>


The GRAPHICs other side:

". << MATERIAL COSMOS" to match with "NOTHINGNESS>>"

and graphic 2's other side is:

". <ISNOW" to match with "NOTYET>"
". <IS-NOW" to follow the "NOT-YET> ."**my preview
reveals this LINE (in explaination) is ALSO fragmented &
useless...almost like a nefarious rascal is sabotage`


Whoa! musta fell thru the LooKing GlaSS ? !

i did not intentionally post ' 3 ', redundant,and
misconstrued-inaccurate-messages...if YOU have the time
& inclination to piece together info from this post &
the 'frown/dead' ICON post, you will have a rudimentary
graphic representing my idea-line...tks a lot!

enjoy the journey

Riff-raff-alunas;

Thanks for acknowledging that I exist. I have written in lots of web sites in the last 6 months and receive no replies at all. I love what you said about keeping it close to my heart. I too worry about what I have stumbled on to. I know that only those who study out side main stream science, can know the true nature of being. This seams to leave me an outsider tho, and this leads to a very lonely intellectual life.

This is the first truly free thinking site I have found, so far, and I am very excited about having this opportunity to relate to others here. Unfortunately, I am only home three days a week, and I cannot seem to catch others when they are in here relating.

I am very happy to be in a site that TOM is part of, he is truly a free thinker. I am only sorry that I am lacking in the math needed to prove my theory. Maybe someone will help me someday.

Once again thanks; PoPpA

PoPpA,
Rene Descartes founded his philosophy upon the only certainties he could find - his own existence ("I think, therefore I am"). You think therefore you exist. Even if you've had little feedback on your theory, if you believe in it continue developing it. The academic world is very formal and it takes years of training to be able to add one small bit to the mountain of knowledge that exists. That's why having fresh creative ideas at the start is sometimes better than trying to be creative after years of training, because you get conditioned by the system into thinking formally, and it stifles creativity.
Being ignored because your ideas are different is not good for science either. It's a reflection of closed mindedness.
This is a good site; it's creative and has good feedback. Freedom to express new ideas is great.
Carry on thinking creatively.
wisp

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote><b>This is a good site; it's creative and has good feedback. Freedom to express new ideas is great.
Carry on thinking creatively.
wisp</b><hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

I agree but just a plug here for UniKEF (See my profile for link). I host an "Other Theories" topic line where alternative ideas are welcomed and are discussed.




Knowing to believe only half of what you hear is a sign of intelligence. Knowing which half to believe can make you a genius.