- Thank you received: 0
Gravity and Neutrinos
22 years 1 month ago #3557
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
My perception of the gravatron is that it is an attempt to quantify gravity and it is not a particle like the neutrino. I see the neutrino as a bogus particle that fills a need in modeling.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MarkVitrone
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
22 years 1 month ago #3758
by MarkVitrone
Replied by MarkVitrone on topic Reply from Mark Vitrone
A question. Can gravitons perhaps be a wave in space that are only detectable as particles when colliding with MI's? If so, can a gravity wave excert enough force to create the phenomena of gravity?
Mark Vitrone
Mark Vitrone
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MarkVitrone
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
22 years 1 month ago #3326
by MarkVitrone
Replied by MarkVitrone on topic Reply from Mark Vitrone
two posts sorry, table my graviton wave thing. Reading back through, the idea that the graviton has high speed due to low mass is fine. However, where is the source of the high velocity? If the graviton has a detectable mass (very small) will it ever have to accelerate past light speed? Are there relativity implications in the propulsion of the graviton in space, or does it "begin" fast and get slowed down and accreted into larger masses after collision? If so, what mechanism creates new gravitons?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- AgoraBasta
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
22 years 1 month ago #3335
by AgoraBasta
Replied by AgoraBasta on topic Reply from
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>Are there relativity implications in the propulsion of the graviton in space...<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>Gravitons and their medium (along with some other possible medium-type entities) are the things that create the illusion of relativistic spacetime. So no, they are not a subject of relativity, they are part of its substratum.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 years 1 month ago #3336
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
The "illusion of space time" that just about sums up astrophysics-at least the theory end of the matter.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MarkVitrone
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
22 years 1 month ago #3340
by MarkVitrone
Replied by MarkVitrone on topic Reply from Mark Vitrone
So in this thread we are defining the observation of general relativity as an illusion created by the presence of gravitons in space and then special relativity is negated as well since gravitons must be FTL and since they have mass must have at some point accelerated past light speed. As an alternate idea, is it possible that only matter bound electromagnetically must obey special relativity since EM waves degrade as they apply wave pressure on their own medium. MI's as small as gravitons would then have an upper speed limit defined by the graviton medium that they propagate through. Collision of those gravitons into the EM bound "larger" MI's then causes them to decellerate and accrete with the larger. Thus the graviton is included with its negligable mass and now will obey Light's special relativity.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.333 seconds