Antigravity Research

Hey Cosmicsurfer

What do you think the Dimensions of this new force is ?
I have been using String Theory's idea of a 11 dimensions
..


MARX

Hi Evolivid!

Been awhile since we have talked. I have to stick with what Tom VanFlandern stated that the graviton operates within the 4th dimension. Time is usually the fourth dimension, and although our frame of reference is dictated by this large scale energy exchange it is impossible for us to view the actual rate of motion. Most likely our visible universe is moving all together as one unit at light speeds or greater---making light radiations a transient energy effect of this greater energy exchange from large scale matter and antimatter paired rotations.

If, all matter is paired with antimatter than we really have to look at a continuum of almost infinite potential of number of dimensions. Are Dual Time Spheres that our visible universe is most likely part of, also vertically locked together like the smaller scale protons forming hyperdimensional molecular structures? Strings occur, look at broken gluon strings if you could call it a string--Fermi labs collider experiments produce broken gluon strings that emit endless streams of quarks and antiquarks at each end. However, this broken string is really a conduit vertical shaft, and our understandings are confined to current misinterpretations of the data. So, we have a long ways to go to free ourselves from these limitations. Break the core shaft that the quark and antiquark move around and you get a huge number of manufactured quarks and antiquarks streaming out of each end.

John

CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS, SOLAR PROTON STORMS, AND ANTIMATTER SOLAR CORE

let's tie the Sun's antimatter core together with sunspot birkeland currents back to galactic core, CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS, and finally Proton Storms. Now, it is all starting to make sense, the reverse motion antimatter core is constantly causing the wind internal solar currents to fluctuate and opens vortex sunspot formations to surface that is repulsive to Protons. This sudden release of antigravitons will fling CME's at Earth instantly and that is the cause for the solar storms. Normal proton graviton capture generated antigravitons causes the sun to disperse radiation normally over it's entire body, it is only because of the core that we have any kind of repulsive flinging of Protons that suddenly cause havoc with earth. Plus, now we can answer the question on how Neutron Stars are formed by the reduction of decentralized proton graviton capture to build up of an antimatter core that slowly gets rid of all the Protons.

Here is a great picture of how magnetic fields, electric charge and ionization processes that we can measure directly occur around the planet Jupiter and it's moon Io:

How Many Neutrinos Does It Take to Screw Up Einstein?


The beginning of the End for Special Relativity Speed Limits!



Results from a second experiment uphold the observation that neutrinos are moving faster than the speed of light. The OPERA collaboration, which first reported the superluminal neutrinos in September, has rerun the experiment and detected 20 new neutrinos breaking Einsteins theoretical limit.

The findings are heartening to anyone hoping to see a major physics revolution in their lifetime. But scientists, as ever, are being cautious, and it will take an independent replication of the results by another team to even begin convincing many of them.

This eliminates one major class of systematic errors, and its impressive for the OPERA team to have mounted in a short period of time, said physicist Robert Plunkett of Fermilab National Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois. However, it doesnt mean that there isnt an error somewhere else in their system.

Neutrinos are subatomic particles with hardly any mass that are able to fly through most matter as if it werent there. Despite their negligible mass, if they were somehow able to exceed the speed-of-light limit set by Einsteins theory of special relativity, it would present a major head-scratcher to modern physicists.

The OPERA teams detector at Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy had previously detected neutrinos produced in bunches at CERN arriving 60 nanoseconds earlier than light speed would allow. The tricky part is that these bunches took a good length of time to produce much longer than 60 nanoseconds so the researchers had to be careful with their analysis. If they thought a neutrino was coming from the start of the bunch when it was actually coming from the end, then that neutrino would not actually be moving faster than light.

In their first experiment, the OPERA team used statistical analysis to show this situation was unlikely, but other scientists were not completely persuaded. The new experiment produced neutrinos in bunches over just three nanoseconds, far shorter than the faster-than-light anomaly. The results were the same: Neutrinos arrived 60 nanoseconds quicker than the speed of light. The findings were robust enough that members of the OPERA collaboration who had refused to sign on to the first paper were now willing to put their name on the new one.

But a great deal of scrutiny remains.

I can now say that the probability of the result being correct has increased from 1 in a million to one in 100 thousand, wrote physicist Philip Gibbs on the viXra log (though he stressed that those numbers were merely illustrative and not actual calculated values).

Tommaso Dorigo, a physicist at CERN, noted on his blog that there are still other possible sources of error. For instance, the OPERA collaborations clock might not have a fine enough resolution to determine exactly when the neutrinos arrived. The measurement therefore is only a partial confirmation of the earlier result: It is consistent with it, but could be just as wrong as the other, he wrote.

Ultimately, the only thing that would convince many in the field is if another team upholds the findings in an independent experiment. Plunkett, co-spokesperson for the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) experiment at Fermilab, says that his collaboration expects to have results checking the OPERA findings in the spring of 2012.

Image: OPERA collaboration

SOURCE: www.futurenewsnetwork.com/index.php?opti...e&Itemid=135&lang=en

DUAL TIME UNIVERSE

Field constructs govern time flow, our time is universal within our 3 dimensions operating at the speed of light and this time frame is what Einstein referred to as the equivalence principle. However, GR and SR fails above light speed because the flux that is generated from the overall forward and reverse time paired motion is extreme. Gravitons form as a result of matter induction taking place in reverse time antiprotons and antimatter galactic matter core black holes and stream around the dual time sphere torus towards forward time causing mass formational processes to take place in arms of galaxies.

Graviton's are a left handed particle, and carry a negative charge just like the electron. Gravitomagnetic fields are captured gravitons and this field transfers momentum, distributes force, and generates matter in forward time. The field spirals through and around the proton forming a sphere around a torus, since magnetic force is really focused gravitons, the electric charge is always coupled at 90 degree angles to the graviton field. That is why magnetic fields are constant because of the cycling of gravitons. Actual G Force is not caused by the graviton but by the antigraviton. The proton is a toroid wrapped in a gravitomagnetic sphere, and the strong force is created by a reaction of the positive charge reverse rotations of the proton to the negatively charged cycling gravitons. Antigraviton emissions are generated at the core of the proton and create a vertical axis that gravitons spin around toward the center of the gravity well. Pick up a rock and turn it on its side, no matter which way you move the rock the atomic gyroscopic orientation will always remain constant within this wall or force field of the gravity well vertical axis that is generated by the extreme exiting of antigravitons. Move the rock into space and now the rock's center is the gravity well---the faster the rotation the greater field strength and generation of gravity causing a higher rate of exiting antigravitons.

Most of existing theories do not cycle gravitons. Naked singularities as black holes do not exist, I know the Gabriel's Horn math is used to represent singularities but infinities do not exist within an already infinite space and although I do agree that the math is useful. Existing theories have not even looked at antimatter induction taking place at centers of black holes and protons, much less dual time universe models. So, our current theories lack an explanation as to why antimatter exists in forward time.

Tom VanFlandern and Roggero Santilli are my favorite scientists. Tom established FTL Graviton motion in the Meta Model of Pushing Gravity. Santilli has blown away existing dogma regarding purpose of antimatter with the isodual mathematics that predicts micro-black holes, antimatter moving backwards in time, gravitation as an electromagnetic solution vs. GR space curvature, that two directions in time is cause for particles and antiparticle annihlations, that space time is symmetric with vertical/horizontal cone shaped hyperdimensional isodual map of four space charge conjugate symmetries, that isodual antiphotons are repulsed by gravitomagnetic fields. Conclusion, that Newton-Santilli force between a particle and its isodual antiparticle is repulsive: How it works, matter and antimatter are attracted to each other, but because they each exist in a conjugate charge state the attraction causes the acceleration of the surrounding forward and reverse time fields. The attraction results in acceleration and repulsion. In other words, the Universe is in a state of continuous attraction and repulsion between forward and reverse time causing a two way flux exchange with micro black hole induction funneling time reversals back towards the otherside, and that is why the gravitons form in reverse time and antigraviton induction takes place in forward time.' John W. Rickey

You do not need to go to all that Rube Goldburg designing to "screw up Einstein". He worked in approximations. E=MC^2 is just that. Fix the problem and you have the answer.