Antigravity Research

Hi Stoat, Hope you have a guinness for st patty's day! I am on my way to a party and I'm wearing a green shirt...Are we talking about aether/elysium here? I would aggree that Vacuum pressure drops in front of all forward motion. Especially if all motion is in concert with a Graviton/Antigraviton cycle. There is a small view point where we exist, if there is a three phase system the blink in the middle is MATTER. So, in front of forward motion MATTER is--- antimatter...that would create a pressure gradient ahead of the motion curve. So, I disagree about slow motion---in fact the motion is extreme. From cooper pairs, to mesons, you have a pairing in rotations and antimatter is always there as part of this subset. I agree about your Neg R.I., I believe that invisibility neg r.i. has a lot to do with this greater FTL motion. John

Hi John, I always go out for paddy's night, I once even celebrated it with your actual poteen. Not a wise move!!

Thinking about what I wrote in the last post, a proton will displace about four million of these lattice particles, only the tops of the spikes are in our sub light space. So it's like the diving bell analogy. However, the neg r.i. part does the opposite. That needs some thinking about.

When I said that a particle moves very slowly, it does, remember that it's spinning at the speed of light, and even if its linear motion was near the speed of light, it would be barely moving in terms of this vacuum lattice stuff. Think like a graviton for a moment, watching matter must be like watching paint dry.

Here's a picture of a wave in a tea cup, one wavelength long. Note that the wave moves but the bulk material doesn't move with it. The molecules rotate in a series of toroids, and at about half the wavelength there's no movement to speak of. So we get toroids as a matter of course.

I would argue that the bottom, very skinny toroid is what we call an atomic particle. Hang on though, the radius of the bread bit of this doughnut could be as small as would be expected from a sub atomic particle but what about its radius from the centre of the model?

I think here we have one of the peculiar properties of a bec space. Gravitational space is huge but its been scrunched up into a space that fits electromagnetic space. The line of toroids are focused into what we call a sub atomic particle.

A possible experiment would be to look at a wave through sections, using that ferromagnetic fluid that someone is doing experiments with on this board. I would like to see whether or not, these rotating toroids develop a corkscrew motion round the bread part of the doughnut.

Hi Stoat, Very nice graphics!!!!! I agree with the toroid model of atom completely. There is pairing though, so these internals---mesons are possibly hung in duplex strings-gluons in the protons. How the graviton flips inside is the question, I am certain that it does and exits out through an antimatter pair or central jet [much like a black hole jet]. These force carriers/strings attach to each toroid, and probably components spin in opposing directions. Regarding time and motion, at the Graviton 4d class motion our slower motion would blip in and out of existance at a very high G rates of observation. The Graviton time zone would appear more stable and long lasting for several reasons, it is probably a much larger region of space and it encapsulates our scale of motion which is at a much reduced frequency and speed of motion and operates in its own 3D matrix. So, I would say for an example in comparing the time differences, 1000 years would equal 1 day for instance on a 4D motion world. That is why some relativity experiments in FTL communications have shown objects showing up prior to being sent which would be an out of loop time problem in our 3D space when interfacing this extremely faster G-motion.

Quantum Tunneling and Quantum Entanglement may both function as a simultaneity FTL communications from the gravitostatic field interacting between original atomic lattice formations which fix the resonance between atoms much like a signature. Split the object in half and strike object will the other half of object also have a superluminal ring???? Here is an example of an FTL communications experiment:

<font size="3"><font size="2"><b>Beam smashes light barrier</b></font id="size2"></font id="size3">


"Scientists have seen a pulse of light emerge from a cloud of gas before it even entered.

This astonishing and baffling observation was made by researchers from the NEC Research Institute in Princeton, US.

They conducted an experiment that involved lasers, a chamber containing cold caesium atoms and a super-fast stopwatch.

The end result was a beam of light that moved at 300 times the theoretical limit for the speed of light.

It was Einstein who said nothing physical could break this barrier because, among other things, to do so would also mean travelling back in time."

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/841690.stm

John

Hi Stoat, I wanted to take a look back at your posts. You have come up with some important attributes of this dampening process of how a BEC gravitostatic field created by Graviton pulse entering our slower motion 3D matrix maintains atomic integrity without causing total destruction from high speed impacts. This is almost a shock wave BEC liquid that is created forming the FTL Gravitostatic Field that protects the slower motion light matter---You do not feel motion within a BEC GF!!!!

Here is excerpts from your earlier post on Negative Refraction:


"I would argue that every bit of matter contains a radius where the r.i. goes negative. In a proton, or neutron, it's tiny, much smaller than h. For a sun it's about 3km in diameter.

So we need a bec material, to slowwn light to a crawl, and we need it to have neg r.i. qualities to allow ftl gravitons/photons to transfer their energy to sub light electrons and photons.

Note that the split ring magnetic resonators in the link article are the tricky bit to make. To get to the magic minus one r.i. we would need to use smaller resonators. That's one of the reasons why the toroidal model of the electron is of interest. In a BEC we do have paired electrons after all.

One thing that has to be noted about this research, they are not looking for neg r.i's in the millions/billions. This is because they don't believe that anything can go faster than light. I would argue that neg r.i. of billions is actually built into the very structure of matter."

I will come back to this with more comments later. John

Hi John, I think I'm going to have to look back at some of those posts as well. I'm ever the one for writing things on beer mats and then forgetting what they were all about when I find them again. To add to the confusion, sometimes an idea starts in one thread then jumps to another, before jumping back again.

There are a few posts, where I've worked something out with that speed of gravity of twenty billion times c and not found anything falling into place. Perhaps if I went back and found those posts, I could plug in my estimate of the speed of gravity and come up with something.

Then there's the arguments that responses to an idea and we've just let drop. The stuff we talked about on quarks got side-tracked by the talk about how would we know if we inside of a subatomic particle of a higher scale.

One thing I think I should point out about that picture of a wave in a teacup. This was not to advance the idea of the toroidal particle as such. I know that there are people on the board who truly dislike the concept. It jut happens to be what waves do Their are numerous studies of beach erosion which all state the same mechanism. A bec "ocean" can have a surface wave by the clever trick of being its own change of medium. A tricky idea to get across, I grant you, but no stranger than qed theory.

I suppose one thing to add, is that although the rim and spike of a space lattice particle have hugely different angular momentum's, they still have the same frequency. At least whilst they are in balance. What changes is the wavelength. As it should, when we look at how light behaves on entering a diamond say.