- Thank you received: 0
quantum gravity replication theory
13 years 9 months ago #21115
by evolivid
Reply from Mark Baker was created by evolivid
Now we know that the faster something goes the more mass it gains...
lets look at what might happen if the spin increase's, the idea
is if the proton is stable because of the "qantum gravity forces"
then an increase in velocity should increase the amount of
[space] being pulled into the proton vortex and distributed
in a mathematicly presice way until decemulation from massive
gravitational force flowing faster out ward then inward
yet at a precise velocity would increase the gravitational force
in a usefull levitation type effect..
The same idea would play a role in assemulation from energy to
mass..
MARX
lets look at what might happen if the spin increase's, the idea
is if the proton is stable because of the "qantum gravity forces"
then an increase in velocity should increase the amount of
[space] being pulled into the proton vortex and distributed
in a mathematicly presice way until decemulation from massive
gravitational force flowing faster out ward then inward
yet at a precise velocity would increase the gravitational force
in a usefull levitation type effect..
The same idea would play a role in assemulation from energy to
mass..
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 9 months ago #24115
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
<b>[evolivid] "Now we know that the faster something goes the more mass it gains..."</b>
Actually this is one of the failures of Special Relativity theory. (I believe it was the first failure.) When experimental evidence began to run counter to this prediction in the 1980s it looked like the death of SR was just around the corner.
But the theoriticians stepped in and saved the day. Now we know that mass is (and always was) invariant. There is no such thing as rest mass, nor a velocity dependent mass. There is just mass, like back in the old days. (The people who teach this stuff live for the day when there is no longer anyone alive who remembers that schools used to teach about rest mass. It is kind of embarrasing.)
Instead, it is the <u>momentum</u> of a remote, moving object that we see as increasing with its velocity.
Regards,
LB
Actually this is one of the failures of Special Relativity theory. (I believe it was the first failure.) When experimental evidence began to run counter to this prediction in the 1980s it looked like the death of SR was just around the corner.
But the theoriticians stepped in and saved the day. Now we know that mass is (and always was) invariant. There is no such thing as rest mass, nor a velocity dependent mass. There is just mass, like back in the old days. (The people who teach this stuff live for the day when there is no longer anyone alive who remembers that schools used to teach about rest mass. It is kind of embarrasing.)
Instead, it is the <u>momentum</u> of a remote, moving object that we see as increasing with its velocity.
Regards,
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 8 months ago #21118
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Thanks Larry for showin that, do you remember in my old post
were I was talking about the mass reducton equation
(massA * massB)*(massA + massB)^^-1 ...
well the idea, I have here is that mass really gets smaller
the closer it gets to other masses and biger the further
away it gets from masses ... so as applying this to the NOW
all the planets are going to be getting closer to each other
so that means that our planet could compress its water mass causing
massive earth quakes around the world, and could be mesured by
when the planets are closest and if im not mistaken there are
going to be 5 panets really close in MAY !! or May Day !
MARX
were I was talking about the mass reducton equation
(massA * massB)*(massA + massB)^^-1 ...
well the idea, I have here is that mass really gets smaller
the closer it gets to other masses and biger the further
away it gets from masses ... so as applying this to the NOW
all the planets are going to be getting closer to each other
so that means that our planet could compress its water mass causing
massive earth quakes around the world, and could be mesured by
when the planets are closest and if im not mistaken there are
going to be 5 panets really close in MAY !! or May Day !
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 8 months ago #21119
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
I made A simulation of the quantum gravity Idea with
electrons and positrons exchanging quark colors
and I will post it on sunday, it's really cool
I used perl's PDL to do it as I found it very easy to use
and its open source
MARX
electrons and positrons exchanging quark colors
and I will post it on sunday, it's really cool
I used perl's PDL to do it as I found it very easy to use
and its open source
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 8 months ago #21129
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
THE THEORY OF QUANTUM GRAVTY
E = E -> [mass][length]2[time]-2
mc2 = m(wavelength * frequency)2 -> [mass]([length][time]-1)2
mass = force / acceleration -> [mass] = [mass][length][time]-2 / [length][time]-2
gravitational acceleration -> [length][time]-2
electron = photon + photon + phonon
positron = phonon + phonon + photon
neutrino = photon + phonon
e = electron
p = positron
epe pep epe
pep epe pep = 1
epe pep epe
pep epe pep
epe pep epe = 2
pep epe pep
121 212 121
212 121 212 = d = down quark
121 212 121
212 121 212
121 212 121 = u = up quark
212 121 212
udu = proton
mass reduction equation = ((massA * massB)*(massA + massB))-1
so using this equation the ratio of electrons to proton is not 1836
according to this theory its 2187 and this amount of mass
balances the charges down to 1 positron ... which you will see in the simulation
MARX
E = E -> [mass][length]2[time]-2
mc2 = m(wavelength * frequency)2 -> [mass]([length][time]-1)2
mass = force / acceleration -> [mass] = [mass][length][time]-2 / [length][time]-2
gravitational acceleration -> [length][time]-2
electron = photon + photon + phonon
positron = phonon + phonon + photon
neutrino = photon + phonon
e = electron
p = positron
epe pep epe
pep epe pep = 1
epe pep epe
pep epe pep
epe pep epe = 2
pep epe pep
121 212 121
212 121 212 = d = down quark
121 212 121
212 121 212
121 212 121 = u = up quark
212 121 212
udu = proton
mass reduction equation = ((massA * massB)*(massA + massB))-1
so using this equation the ratio of electrons to proton is not 1836
according to this theory its 2187 and this amount of mass
balances the charges down to 1 positron ... which you will see in the simulation
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 8 months ago #21131
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
THE SIMULATION ...
****
now I only used electrons and positrons
but it looks like they are exchanging color forces
yellow green light-blue..... anti quarks ?
blue red purple..... quarks ?
after some reviewing I think i found the color relationship,
so now each electron and positron can have a quark color
in this theory, and the color specifing a different force.
electric = blue
magnetic = green
electric nuclear weak = red
nuclear strong magnetic = yellow
gravitational electric = purple
gravitational magnetic = light blue
black = darkmatter particle
I noticed that as the particles reach the very center
of the vortex the particles lose there color charge
and take on a darkmatter force untill the phonon or
photon reach the outer field and then they take on
a color charge agian.
MARX
****
now I only used electrons and positrons
but it looks like they are exchanging color forces
yellow green light-blue..... anti quarks ?
blue red purple..... quarks ?
after some reviewing I think i found the color relationship,
so now each electron and positron can have a quark color
in this theory, and the color specifing a different force.
electric = blue
magnetic = green
electric nuclear weak = red
nuclear strong magnetic = yellow
gravitational electric = purple
gravitational magnetic = light blue
black = darkmatter particle
I noticed that as the particles reach the very center
of the vortex the particles lose there color charge
and take on a darkmatter force untill the phonon or
photon reach the outer field and then they take on
a color charge agian.
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.348 seconds