New evidence that Micro black holes are everywhere

Hi Larry, If you read my post I mostly agreed with Tom. The only advancement that I have offered is to consider the cause of "flux" as the originating point for gravitons to black holes in an antimatter paired rotation. My goal has always been to discover the "truth" as to how the Universe works. That is what Tom VanFlandern was all about, and I have a deep respect for his body of work. I believe that I have refined the source for where graviton's orginate from which as defined in the Meta Model is still "flux." The other refinement is that gravitons form fields and do not necessarily collide with MI's, but create MI's. Whereas, most astrophysicists believe that it is the HIGGS field that is responsible for inertial mass, exactly where does this HIGGS field originate from? This thinking originated from a Big Bang creation of the Universe scenario which is naive at best, and not tied to any cycling of energy from a continuous source. So, I am clearly more alligned with the Meta Model.

Tom VanFlandern, was a great man who fought against the blind arrogance that has kept a revolution in thinking about how our Universe really works suppressed. Tom has made a huge impact on my life, so this discussion is not about who is right or wrong but discovering the truth. I cherished the discussions that I have had with Tom, in fact we may not have agreed on every detail but we had respect for each other. But, I always grew intellectually when we had a conversation.

So Larry, here are specifics: The Meta Model is the best published model on explaining gravitational motion. I am in agreement with no big bang, multiple scales, speed of graviton, flat space, and no singularities. Here is where I expand the Meta Model, source of gravitons tied to paired antimatter rotations, gravitons operate faster than light and this motion generates a higher "frequency" above that of the light spectrum [Tom did not see how this could be possible]---the reason for "higher frequencies" is that the motion is too great and friction creates spin which generates a frequency. Galactic inward flow of gravitons creates pressure, graviton capture, gravitons cycle, and ultimately flip polarity in black holes. No collisions that is the huge difference but creates a back eddy solar system gravitomagnetic field spinning away from center like an echo where MASS FORMATIONS OCCUR. Balanced galactic plane either in two or four arms, with a compression reverse antimatter core creating not only antigravitons but a relativity jet. Now we are talking about a completed cycle forming mass around galactic centers. Black holes now have a function, they create arms of galaxies and regenerate antigraviton radiation rather than being a dumping ground for gravitational compression that evaporates with hawking radiation. So, Larry I think I have expanded the Meta Model to include a total regenerative component to cycling energy in Universe. It may not be correct, but at least I am thinking and trying to make progress in expanding our understandings on how this continuous creation that is infinite in all directions works. John W. Rickey

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />Leo,



Something conceptual (such as a black hole) is not a good tool for exploring something physical, like gravity. But it can be a great tool for exploring something conceptual, like infinity.

Regards,
LB
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

So as a matter of fact we may conclude, that the gravity anomalies
found during solar eclipses are related to at least TWO phenomena.
A: the inclination of the solar equator with our line of sight (BO)
(pressure field A)
B: the relation with the cycle of the sunpots ( pressure field

for field A and B see:
migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/03/blog-post.html

Leo Vuyk