Sorry, Tom. You may have already figured it out that it may have been that darned comma at the end of the link. The correct link is:
arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0701280
There are lots of stories on this paper popping up on space related sites, such as:
www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-03/eso-tgt030707.php
www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=5263
I just wondered if this is something you or Arp had looked at previously. I can certainly send a pdf file, though I suspect you've tracked it down by now.
"Hanky panky" was probably not to appropriate term to use, as it implies impropriety. I simply meant is this another effort to patch the crumbling redshift-as-distance model.
Dave
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by tvanflandern</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by davidjinks</i>
<br />Any comment on the NGC 5011C near-versus-far debate? See
arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0701280
, for example.
I am currently blocked from reading anything in arXix. Their robot says it is a problem with my ISP's domain, not personal to me. I'm making further inquiries.
In the meantime, I'd be grateful if you would send me a copy of the article, or at least the abstract. PDF format is preferred. -|Tom|-
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Topic Author
