string theory - complete nonsense?

More
20 years 6 months ago #9639 by mhelland
Replied by mhelland on topic Reply from Mike Helland
Works for me. Still giving you problems? Dang brinkster.com...

mhelland@techmocracy.net

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 6 months ago #9741 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
It is not working here. But, I got a different reply that said the default mail client is not properly installed-what ever that means.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 6 months ago #9862 by mhelland
Replied by mhelland on topic Reply from Mike Helland
Uh, you probably cliked on my email address. Here's the website:
www.techmocracy.net/science/time.htm

mhelland@techmocracy.net

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 6 months ago #9641 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
Ok I see you have a problem with the absorbtion/emmission process of the photon. Can you confine this topic to that problem? Or do you have a need to flail away at everything in the universe?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 6 months ago #10045 by mhelland
Replied by mhelland on topic Reply from Mike Helland
I'm not sure I get your question.

The topic of this thread was the nonsense idea that there are "curled up" dimensions described by string theory. My suggestion is that these dimensions are not curled up, but they exist outright.

In fact, it is in these dimensions where the meachinism that allows for the abosrbtion and emission of photons to take place.

This mechanism literally produces all the information that we gather from out interactions of the universe, and in this information we may deduce the 4 dimensions of space-time that we perceive.

These fundmental dimensions create our dimensions, so the fundamental dimensions are invisible because we do not interact directly with them (our interactions are an effect of them), not because they are "curled up."

That I need to adjust our understanding of matter, space, and time as a result of phenomena, as opposed to the facilitators of phenomena is not only convienent and elegant, it is more and more becoming necessary in understanding QM. Check this out:

arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0102/0102109.pdf

The conclusion based on the experiments?

<quote>
The most prudent description of this result is that a
wave function, when interacting with a row of other wave
functions one after another, does not comply with ordinary
notion of causality, space and time.
</quote>

mhelland@techmocracy.net

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 6 months ago #9642 by mhelland
Replied by mhelland on topic Reply from Mike Helland
I would also like to point out that in my view of nature, not only are space and time deeply related (as they are both a consequence of interaction) that matter is also present in this relationship (also a consequence of interaction).

This is very similar to the Meta Model's 5 dimensions of scale/mass, and in fact, in early version of my paper I too claimed that mass was a dimension. I have since refined all these ideas to be consistent with quantum phenomena.

mhelland@techmocracy.net

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.331 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum