- Thank you received: 0
Faces from the Chasmas
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
18 years 4 months ago #8951
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
Here is the first of the new images found in two separate image strips.
E0201962, "Sculptured Faces," already shown, was imaged in 2001. Note the medium sized face near last on the left, with high forehead, and semi-bald head with black hair.
M1002361, "Sculptured Faces West," was imaged in 2000. Clearly shown is the same face with semi-bald head, and others less clear. The large face seen in E02 is off to the right and not visible. More than one image of any feature is always preferable to one for a number of reasons.
Same image with arrow.
Another image,"Mask," from M1002361.
And Mask in darker contrast.
Neil
E0201962, "Sculptured Faces," already shown, was imaged in 2001. Note the medium sized face near last on the left, with high forehead, and semi-bald head with black hair.
M1002361, "Sculptured Faces West," was imaged in 2000. Clearly shown is the same face with semi-bald head, and others less clear. The large face seen in E02 is off to the right and not visible. More than one image of any feature is always preferable to one for a number of reasons.
Same image with arrow.
Another image,"Mask," from M1002361.
And Mask in darker contrast.
Neil
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 4 months ago #8952
by emanuel
Replied by emanuel on topic Reply from Emanuel Sferios
Hey Neil,
That is the coolest looking face I've seen yet! The dude is even wearing sunglasses! Here, I made a key for others to see it. Amazing! Good find! - Emanuel
And I just realized that you can even see an upper torso on him. At least a very well-defined left shoulder. I didn't highlight it in the key because I just noticed it, but it's pretty anatomically correct.
That is the coolest looking face I've seen yet! The dude is even wearing sunglasses! Here, I made a key for others to see it. Amazing! Good find! - Emanuel
And I just realized that you can even see an upper torso on him. At least a very well-defined left shoulder. I didn't highlight it in the key because I just noticed it, but it's pretty anatomically correct.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 4 months ago #8953
by shando
Replied by shando on topic Reply from Jim Shand
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 4 months ago #8954
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neilderosa
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 4 months ago #8955
by neilderosa
Replied by neilderosa on topic Reply from Neil DeRosa
Here's more grist for the mills of those who think I'm making all of this up. I found "Clown" in two image strips and Rich contributed one more today.
Original "Clown," M00200343.
"Clown," M1301494. Part of face on right is off screen.
"Clown," E1002357, contribured by Rich.
What does this all mean? I get the sense that I may be going too fast for some of you to digest it all. Let's just say they all look a little different due to differing resolution, lighting, and camera angle, and leave it there for now.
Oh, by the way; these three confirmations of the same image are also an objective demonstration that these images are really on this cliff wall on Mars and not a trick photography hoax.
Neil
Original "Clown," M00200343.
"Clown," M1301494. Part of face on right is off screen.
"Clown," E1002357, contribured by Rich.
What does this all mean? I get the sense that I may be going too fast for some of you to digest it all. Let's just say they all look a little different due to differing resolution, lighting, and camera angle, and leave it there for now.
Oh, by the way; these three confirmations of the same image are also an objective demonstration that these images are really on this cliff wall on Mars and not a trick photography hoax.
Neil
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 years 4 months ago #15913
by emanuel
Replied by emanuel on topic Reply from Emanuel Sferios
Neil,
I definitely think that the "Sean Connery with sunglasses" is a much better face than "Phil." Take a look again at Sean Connery. He's got perfect proportions.
But the fact that *two* faces can be seen overlapping here is more evidence for pareidolia. Also, today I was looking at a photo of Mt. St. Helens erupting, and there was this huge mushroom cloud. I was able to see a number of faces in it similar to the kinds you are finding.
Emanuel
I definitely think that the "Sean Connery with sunglasses" is a much better face than "Phil." Take a look again at Sean Connery. He's got perfect proportions.
But the fact that *two* faces can be seen overlapping here is more evidence for pareidolia. Also, today I was looking at a photo of Mt. St. Helens erupting, and there was this huge mushroom cloud. I was able to see a number of faces in it similar to the kinds you are finding.
Emanuel
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.441 seconds