Yours is a good idea in spirit, but has problems in practice. The key problem is that the constellations are not permanent, but change drastically over time as we move through the Galaxy. Go 100,000 years into the past and you would no longer recognize much of the sky. We do not know when the arranged triangles on Mars were built, so we don't know what the sky looked like at the time. Moreover, most of the stars that dominate at any one time are dwarfs, and we haven't even discovered many dwarf stars that might be part of any distant past star patterns because they were close then but are far away now.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">With the theory that pyramids at Giza are arranged with respect to Orion's belt...<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">One reason that theory has not caught on is because the stars in Orion's belt are moving with respect to one another, so it is a virtual certainty that at some point in time, the arrangement of these three stars will form a pattern that resembles any random pattern made of three dots that we can imagine. Three points of coincidence are not enough to argue that any similarity rises above chance. -|Tom|-
