Deep-Gas, Deep Hot Biosphere Theory

Gregg, I did a search and here is some further follow up on Uranium salts greenish yellow glow under ultraviolet light:

"Scientists have long known that uranium salts under ultraviolet light will glow an eerie greenish-yellow in the dark."

www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/09/060915203610.htm

Now pair this with huge chambers under pyramids containing H20 for hydrogen plasma power generation that would produce the necessary ultraviolet light as a by-product of the BLACK LIGHT PROCESS:





"A plasma called an rt-plasma formed with a low field (1V/cm), at low temperatures, from atomic hydrogen generated at a tungsten filament and strontium which was vaporized by heating the metal. Typically requiring very high fields or power, plasma formation under these conditions is extraordinary and there is agreement among experts in the field that this cannot be explained by conventional plasma physics."

www.blacklightpower.com/process.shtml

Also, Strontium 90 is by-product of plutonium enrichment. Wonder if Pyramid shape was a lense for cosmic energy/gravitons/releasing large amounts of energy below pyramids in a plasma enrichment process. Also, I have a copy of bid request from US Government regarding Underground Pyramid Research Project requesting Electrical Grounding Equipment. Makes you wonder what was really going on there and why they needed grounding equipment.

John Rickey

Hi Jim, we have to talk about QED, or SED, and the uncertainty principle here, because we are talking about very small things. Now I happen to disagree with the ideas being presented but if one wants to propose a new model then it's not me that has to be persuaded but the mainstream physics community.

Let's scale up the spherical electron to give us some idea of what's going on. We have a metre ball and we want to surface charge it proportional to the charge on an electron. I get 40 billion volts for that result. We couldn't to do it but if there was a spike say, on the surface, then the charge will leak from it at an even higher voltage. It would tear a hole in itself.

On the physics of the fusion bomb. The first h bomb weighed 65 tons! Then they hit upon the idea of using lithium deuteride round the core. Fission releases about 0.1% of the mass energy of matter. Fusion, about 0.5% So, if the bomb designers were wrong about how the lithium hydride gave up its energy, they would have packed the trigger U135 with too little material. This they evidently didn't do, as it went off with the expected yield.

Pyramid shaped power stations? I'm dubious about this. I worked on Drax B for C.A. Parsons, and the station itself has to be built around a whole load of kit, in a big hole. The shell of the station is nothing more than a gantry for cranes, which is prettified by an architect. It has to be that way, because when something breaks down, it has to be got out. In the nature of things, we are talking gigantic lumps of kit. Think of the hydrogen cooling system for instance. It would be sheer folly to encase this in huge blocks of stone. The whole kit has to be plastered with safety sensors. We need to be able to get at it for repair.

No, people; and they weren't slave labour; built the pyramids, for their own social reasons. The scale of the things is industrial but the purpose cannot be.

Hi Stoat, speaking of industrial scale in regards to building Great Pyramid. 2.3 million dressed stones at 2.5 tons each, took 6.7 stones per minute for 20 years. An impossible feat when considering that the ceiling vault stones are all at slanted angles that had to have been lowered into place by a crane. Also, high speed drill holes exceed engineering capabilities of time, lathe turning of stone, and engineering specifications on grand scales. 2,000,000 lb blocks lifted into place in Lebanon. Now throw in Pyramids, faces and many structures on Mars. Genesis Bible-Giants were on the Earth and mated with mankind. Clues, that maybe we really do not have a grip on what actually happened in our pre-history.

<hr noshade size="1">
Gregg, great ideas regarding pyramids on Earth and Mars. I would like to read your article if you can tell me where to find it. Also, came across infomation that stated that the pyramids when technology was activated had a greenish glow at night. Not sure if this fits into any nuclear reactions or not. I have been collecting ancient pictures of artifacts and some could be construed as rockets. With so much vetrification [melted fused rock] of ancient ruins in Iraq, and other large areas that are covered in glass beads I would not be surprised if nuclear weapons were used during an end times of their presence on our planet.

Looking forward to your next installment,

John Rickey
<hr noshade size="1">

The general theme of my idea is to let geometry "explain" the behavior of the particles and their mediums instead of having endless quantum mechanic rules, orders, laws, exclusions, corollaries, etc. Does anyone seriously believe that all these fundamental particles are little Einsteins who make the correct decision every picofemtosecond? In the geometric explanation, all the particles are dead, passive, make no decisions and don't detect anything until they collide with one another. Which is the more simpler explanation?

Let's see: the electron has to be in an orbital, which is part of a subshell, which is part of a shell. I like the 4N, 3f, 2p orbital myself. Oh, and it has to have either top spin or bottom spin, in the form of +3/2s or -1/2 or....I'm getting dizzy. This is splendid choreography but where is the Reality?

Not to mention that if an electron can absorb or release a photon, it gets to jump to another orbital! Yet, as explained on this site, a photon is not a particle. It is a geometric momentum wave in the Elysium medium.

Arriving at a hollow pyramid for a proton was done by using "form follows function" and adhering to "Physics Has Its Principles". (One may argue that I failed to follow these principles.) I have kept with: all transfers of momentum must be by direct collision; no action at a distance; no creation of something out of nothing; no annihilation of something into nothing. None of the three fundamental particles: graviton or elyson or proton - are created or destroyed. There are no attractive forces. There are no mysterious energies or forces. Any and all energies and forces can be found to be assemblies of the three fundamental particles having mass and velocity:

1) Chemical energy released is the vaporization of liquid Elysium, which is in "hidden" or "protected" positions on a nucleus.

2) The weak nuclear force or energy is the release of a small amount of hot, liquid Elysium held between the sides of two protons if they are separated.

3) The strong nuclear force or energy is the release of a large amount of hot, liquid Elysium that is trapped inside of two protons when they are mated base to base. Achieve fission; get tremendous energy release.

4) Magnestism is simply a "focussing" or co-linearization of the gravitational flux brought about by the geometry of certain nuclei. If the nuclei can be assembled in crystals, as is Iron, the magnetism effect adds up to a macroscopic phenomena. <b>There is a magnetic monopole: the hydrogen atom.</b> Look it up.

5) Electricity is the flow of liquid Elysium over the surface of nuclei which are well connected. It flows "downhill" relative to the local gravitational flux. If you set up a generator, whose motion will cause a push on the liquid Elysium, you get an electrical current. Guess why magnets have to be in generators or motors.

6) Electromagnetic waves are created if liquid Elysium falls into the hollow cavity of an open proton. The only way out for the liquid Elysium is to be vaporized by the gravitational flux.

Okay, guys, call me a simpleton. I will consider it a compliment. Why does fundamental Reality have to be unduly complicated?

Gregg Wilson

That, is some great stuff Gregg, reality should not be complicated. Have you given up on your model ship building?
thebobgy

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by thebobgy</i>
<br />That, is some great stuff Gregg, reality should not be complicated. Have you given up on your model ship building?
thebobgy
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

No, but I have a pending problem. My wife, Bonnie, does not approve of my idea of placing my 91 inch battlewagon on the mantel over the fireplace. What...is...her....issue?


Gregg Wilson