- Thank you received: 0
Planet X and the Annunaki
21 years 9 months ago #5042
by Jeremy
Reply from was created by Jeremy
I think Zecharia has a high bar to jump over. No such planet is known to exist. And it is very unlikely life could survive such severe environmental temperature changes being on such an orbit. Zecharia should have talked to an astronomer first before hanging his hat on that idea.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- subspace-anamole
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 9 months ago #4944
by subspace-anamole
Replied by subspace-anamole on topic Reply from jason mcmillen
True, this is a high bar to jump over. However, Sitchin has translated over 200 ancient Sumerian clay cylinders which describe our solar system (even the existence of Pluto) in great detail. The information indicates that Planet X (Nibiru by the ancients) is a Radiant planet, perhaps meaning that it has a high core temperature. As far as scientific evidence of the existence of the tenth planet goes, apparently there is a published paper from 1992 by Tom Van Flandern and former chief of the U.S. Naval Observatory that even goes as far as calling this tenth planet an "intruder" planet. I find this subject intriguing to say the least.
Subspace-Anamole
Subspace-Anamole
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 9 months ago #4945
by Jeremy
Replied by Jeremy on topic Reply from
I read Sitchin's first book many years ago. I found it interesting but I couldn't buy his description of the planet as liveable. If you have radiant heat from the planet it may be warm enough as you go out but will be way too hot when you're going in towards the Sun. Everyone would have to carry flashlights for several hundred years. That just doesn't seem reasonable to me.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 9 months ago #4947
by Gregg
Replied by Gregg on topic Reply from Gregg Wilson
Sitchin might be correct on some matters by shear chance. His translations might be correct on occasion. However, he demonstrates no critical faculty in regard to science and technology. He does not seem to be able to separate fantasy from reality.
For instance, his futuristic propulsion consists of heating water to steam, within the spacecraft, by means of laser beams from Earth; the steam is then expelled from the spacecraft, propelling it forward. At what temperature? At what efficiency? Why is the laser beam not dissipated by the atmosphere? What happens to the spacecraft structural material? What about the curvature of the Earth? There are a hundred other questions.
In all probability, Nibiru is Mars or was the primary planet of Mars.
Gregg Wilson
For instance, his futuristic propulsion consists of heating water to steam, within the spacecraft, by means of laser beams from Earth; the steam is then expelled from the spacecraft, propelling it forward. At what temperature? At what efficiency? Why is the laser beam not dissipated by the atmosphere? What happens to the spacecraft structural material? What about the curvature of the Earth? There are a hundred other questions.
In all probability, Nibiru is Mars or was the primary planet of Mars.
Gregg Wilson
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quantum_Gravity
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 9 months ago #5017
by Quantum_Gravity
Replied by Quantum_Gravity on topic Reply from Randall damron
wouldn't that be considered theology or philopshy?
The intuitive mind
The intuitive mind
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.356 seconds