- Thank you received: 0
Broken Circle
20 years 11 months ago #7418
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>,stays nothing!!your formula will always stay n
>(+n)+(-n) because once "N" stands for something it is no longer,well "nothing" therefore the formula stands "something not found yet"</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
<font color="yellow">Your third unfounded assumption and assertion.</font id="yellow">
mac
you told me yourself that "nothing" is well "nothing" so who is making the assumption or assertion,since YOU claim that "nothing" is the absence of time and space!!
>(+n)+(-n) because once "N" stands for something it is no longer,well "nothing" therefore the formula stands "something not found yet"</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
<font color="yellow">Your third unfounded assumption and assertion.</font id="yellow">
mac
you told me yourself that "nothing" is well "nothing" so who is making the assumption or assertion,since YOU claim that "nothing" is the absence of time and space!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 11 months ago #7419
by Mac
Replied by Mac on topic Reply from Dan McCoin
north,
<b>,stays nothing!!your formula will always stay n
>(+n)+(-n) because once "N" stands for something it is no longer,well "nothing" therefore the formula stands "something not found yet"
you told me yourself that "nothing" is well "nothing" so who is making the assumption or assertion,since YOU claim that "nothing" is the absence of time and space!!</b>
<font color="yellow">Perhaps I have misinterpreted your post but I don't think so.
My imprssion was you were saying the +/-s could never occur, that N had to stay nothing. If that is your intent then my comment stands.
If you are making the point the once N does become +/-s it is no longer Nothing then I have no objection to your post.</font id="yellow">
"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien
<b>,stays nothing!!your formula will always stay n
>(+n)+(-n) because once "N" stands for something it is no longer,well "nothing" therefore the formula stands "something not found yet"
you told me yourself that "nothing" is well "nothing" so who is making the assumption or assertion,since YOU claim that "nothing" is the absence of time and space!!</b>
<font color="yellow">Perhaps I have misinterpreted your post but I don't think so.
My imprssion was you were saying the +/-s could never occur, that N had to stay nothing. If that is your intent then my comment stands.
If you are making the point the once N does become +/-s it is no longer Nothing then I have no objection to your post.</font id="yellow">
"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 11 months ago #7646
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
My imprssion was you were saying the +/-s could never occur, that N had to stay nothing. If that is your intent then my comment stands.
If you are making the point the once N does become +/-s it is no longer Nothing then I have no objection to your post.[/yellow]
"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien
[/quote]
mac
before i can make a comment on either statement i need clarification on both statements.before the formula was N---->(+n)+(-n),now it looks like division.for instance what is (-s),there is no (+s).what does (s) stand for?
If you are making the point the once N does become +/-s it is no longer Nothing then I have no objection to your post.[/yellow]
"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien
[/quote]
mac
before i can make a comment on either statement i need clarification on both statements.before the formula was N---->(+n)+(-n),now it looks like division.for instance what is (-s),there is no (+s).what does (s) stand for?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 11 months ago #7820
by Mac
Replied by Mac on topic Reply from Dan McCoin
North,
Actually I have stipulated that but yes I have changed it at the suggestion of others. The original was 0
>(+1)+(-1) but was mathematical and the integer "1" I found limiting. It was then changed to N
>(+n)+(-n) but it was pointed out that "n" carried the mathematical conotation of a numerical series.
The Current version is N--->(+s)+(-s) where "N" is "Nothingness" defined as absence of time and space and "+/-"s" are equal opposite "Somethings".
The "s"'s might be for example + = time and -s = space or they may represent + as existance in our universe and - existance in a -verse conservation resovoir.
"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien
Actually I have stipulated that but yes I have changed it at the suggestion of others. The original was 0
>(+1)+(-1) but was mathematical and the integer "1" I found limiting. It was then changed to N
>(+n)+(-n) but it was pointed out that "n" carried the mathematical conotation of a numerical series.
The Current version is N--->(+s)+(-s) where "N" is "Nothingness" defined as absence of time and space and "+/-"s" are equal opposite "Somethings".
The "s"'s might be for example + = time and -s = space or they may represent + as existance in our universe and - existance in a -verse conservation resovoir.
"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 11 months ago #7522
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
mac
okay,the formula has changed.
but i would like to know what you were trying to say in each of the statements in your reply before this last one.explain each on it's own so i can make a seperate reply to each.
okay,the formula has changed.
but i would like to know what you were trying to say in each of the statements in your reply before this last one.explain each on it's own so i can make a seperate reply to each.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 11 months ago #7422
by Mac
Replied by Mac on topic Reply from Dan McCoin
north,
Posted - 20 Dec 2003 : 00:25:35
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>mac
okay,the formula has changed.
but i would like to know what you were trying to say in each of the statements in your reply before this last one.explain each on it's own so i can make a seperate reply to each.</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
<font color="yellow">Your request is a bit vauge as to which entries you want expounded on. If you will ask specific questions I will respond to each.
Thanks.</font id="yellow">
"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien
Posted - 20 Dec 2003 : 00:25:35
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>mac
okay,the formula has changed.
but i would like to know what you were trying to say in each of the statements in your reply before this last one.explain each on it's own so i can make a seperate reply to each.</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
<font color="yellow">Your request is a bit vauge as to which entries you want expounded on. If you will ask specific questions I will respond to each.
Thanks.</font id="yellow">
"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.352 seconds