SOME ASPECTS OF NEW PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY

In his book "the Character of Physical Law" (p.37-39), RichardFeynman wrote:
"Suppose that in the world everywhere there are a lot of (space filling vacuum-) particles, flying through us at very high speed. They come equally from all directions, -just shooting by- and they also partly hit us in a bombardment.
We and the sun, are practically transparent for them. Practically, but not completely,and some of them hit. Look at what would happen; If the earth is moving it is running into the particles coming towards it and away from the ones that are chasing it from behind.
So more particleswill hit from the front than from the back, and there will be a(vacuum) force opposing any motion. This force would slow the Earth up in its orbit" (which is proved to be not the case); so that is the end of that theory......!
.......Well you say, it was a good one, and I got rid of the mathematics for a while, maybe I could invent a better one". THAT IS WHAT THIS WEBLOG IS ALL ABOUT.
In "Crazy" but SERIOUS contrast with Richard Feynman's story, this new model assumes that Nature may compensate such an opposing vacuum resistance by a NEW vacuum MECHANISM..
1: if the Feynman vacuum particles are supposed to be energetic oscillating vacuum particles coined "Higgs-Virgin Particles"oscillating in a chiral 3D vacuum lattice and
2: if the mass carrying particles (of the Earth) have the ability, by real Lorentz transformations, to absorb just enough energy of this oscillating Higgs-vacuum frame in the right direction to compensate for the opposing vacuum resistance and to keep this Lorentz polarization in its memory as a guiding mechanism.
This polarizing guiding mechanism is coined a "Big Bang Entanglement" memory, active from the beginning of the universes between TWO OR MORE CPT ( Charge Parity and Time) symmetric ( anti-) COPY UNIVERSES!! and also acting as an instantaneous medium to keep the object- subject "eigenstate" of each particle harmonized..
As a result. this weblog describes my personal alternative reductionist’s view on some aspects of mainstream physics and astronomy.
In general this alternative contribution is the product of intuitive and logic thinking about a three dimensional image of reality down to the Planckian scale of the cosmos.

I choose a so called "Lattice model" base for the vacuum in contrast with the so called “continuum of space and spacetime models”. Both ideas about the structure of space are well known in mainstream physics.
This Lattice model concentrates on the way SPACE is fully filled-up with a topological 3-D lattice which represents the oscillation trajectories of Higgs particles.
These Higgs particles are assumed to have a rigid RING-form and able to transform the ring by collision into real rigid Fermions or Bosons.
It is assumed that at each lattice there are two Higgs particles active in a continuous oscillation process able to transfer bosonic information from the source of the boson down to the measurement location in some unresolved digital (or trigital tetrahedron) way.
Secondly it is assumed that Higgs particles transform their shape into bosons, (photons, gravitons, gluons) by collision processes with real spinning Fermions.
As a result, the energy (radiation) and the Spin of the electron is produced only by mechanical Collisions. Thus it is assumed that the form of Fermions should have a “propeller form “ with left- or right handed PITCH to realize a left- or right handed Spin.

HIGGS-GRAVITON QUANTUM GRAVITY.
The Fermions of the Earth are assumed to produce gluons, photons and gravitons by the Higgs collision process..
As a result, there are more Higgs particles with a Higgs identity going into the Earth than there are Higgs particles with a Higgs identity coming out.
If we also assume that the average Higgs collision impact on Fermions is larger than a graviton impact on Fermions, then a new kind of Quantum Gravity is presented: the “Higgs-Graviton Quantum Gravity". (click here).

It is postulated that the length of these lattices are in general (in normal vacuum, far away from Black holes) the same in length, they are gathering together at connection points.
The structure of the lattice is of a tetrahedron kind of shape, which is equipped with a so called “chiral rotation” (left or right handed) all through the vacuum inside one and the same universe.
ir. Leo Vuyk ( architect/engineer)
bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Leo Vuyk</i>
<br />If the earth is moving it is running into the particles coming towards it and away from the ones that are chasing it from behind.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">That objection is "ancient history", having been first addressed and solved in the 19th century.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">THAT IS WHAT THIS WEBLOG IS ALL ABOUT.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Does your model have anything to offer that the current replacement paradigm, pushing gravity, does not do as well or better? By comparing your model to 19th century models instead of 21st century models at a point in history when thousands have their own pet theories and can communicate them via the internet, the reaction you are getting for your "model #2417" is one of yawns. Read "Pushing Gravity", our "Gravity" CD, and/or material on the parent web site of this Message Board. Then discuss the pros and cons of your model vs. PG and its parent cosmology, the Meta Model, which are the best currently available with a sizeable constituency.

That is the key to generating interest and discussion. -|Tom|-

Hi Leo, You and I are probably the only two people on this message board that think that the Universe for it to even exist must be CPT symmetric. It is obvious through observation of orbital objects in our Universe that all motion of mass is anything but random. I agree with some of Tom's Meta Model first principles, yet disagree with the pushing part of the graviton because I see this waveform as a demodulation of FTL frequencies (transfering momentum maintaining orbit speed) within all mass, and dependent upon mass body dipolar charge relationships between objects can be repulsive or an attractive force. All motion in our Universe is a circular motion around a zero point, and because of charge, parity, and time symmetries between these forward and reverse motions of a many scale of frequencies these fields collapse regenerating mass formations as they move in concert with the greater field motion of Universe.

So, Tom has also been key in understanding space is flat, only fields curve, and that there are an infinite number of scales or possible scale combinations. In other words that the Universe can have no center because therefore there would be a boundary condition, and then what would be on the other side (would not be infinite)? Well, I disagree with the central issue that a Universe can not have a center. In fact, there are many centers but without the two way circulations nothing could in fact exist. Atomic demodulation of these high frequencies may be only the tip of the iceburg because if there are an unlimited number of scales then frequencies at the highest of levels would include such high speed particles (higher the frequencies the smaller the particle waveform) that they would circulate instantly around zero points at micro levels, and that extreme energy would approach a ZERO TIME point of first contact. The point of origin for all things. So collapse at the micro fine zero point would approach an infinity but would be a finite point and those energies would be extreme! We would not be able to go there and if we could "tap into it" would make Nuclear explosions look like a fire cracker on the cosmic scheme of highest of relativities (a real big bang but would always reform back to matter/antimatter symmetries forming the two way time circulations around a zero point).

So how in touch are we really with understanding the physics of our Universe? I think we still have a long way to go to dig our selves out of the theoretical hole that we have dug for ourselves. Thanks to Tom, we have a message board that allows free expression of ideas. We can discuss other options beyond GR, SR, and the Big Bang Theory.

John

What I have to offer is a hand full of test, to show that the quantum universe is able to mimic relativity rules and that quantum gravity fields seem to influence extinction distances ( 70 mlj km) for the additional Earth rotational extra lightspeed of 30 km/sec of a radar signal leaving the Earth onto Venus or Mercury. Thus the radar signal speed seems to depend over a long distance on the speed of the source!!!! thus also on the reflecting medium e.g. Venus or Mercury. see how I came to that idea by some research on the Babcock and Bergman test:

bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/0...dent-lightspeed.html


bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/0...could-influence.html


Leo Vuyk.

Hi John,

Thanks for your kind reaction,

For my CPT symmetric Multiverse ideas more in detail see:

bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/0...e-black-hole-to.html

and also:

home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40

Including ideas about consciousness.

Leo.