<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
So the only way to be sure is to check if claimed sources (usually "Prof. X at Moscow University") actually exist. Mostly, they don't exist, or they didn't say what is attributed to them, or something was taken out of context.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
The following excerpt is from:
"
www.onelight.com/thei/hollowmoon.html
"
"In 1959 eminent scientist Professor Iosif Shklovsky put forth his findings in relation to the "moons" circling Mars. "After carefully weighing up the evidence he concludes that they are both hollow" (6)
While some "orthodox" scientists will quietly admit that some earthly bodies are probably hollow, they steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that ALL planets and moons are NATURALLY hollow and hurry to add they must be "artificial" satellites."
I have done a simple search on the internet for the above professor and he seems to be legit, but is there a site where I can log onto to find out for sure?
Also can you tell me why if there is only gravity and motion responsible for planets circling the sun, do they not have erratic orbits over time due to the gravity from other planets affecting them?
Surely this would make some planets eventually crash into others?
Cheers
David
Topic Author
