- Thank you received: 0
The entropy of systems
19 years 11 months ago #11804
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by GD</i>
<br />North,
Every atom in your body is accelerated towards the ground at 10 m/s^2. this is not an equilibrium state.
These atoms also react to position (ie: relative to surface of the earth) and with time. Where do you see a neutral state ?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
the thing is GD now you are giving the "atom" an ENVIROMENT. recall what i said before.
<br />North,
Every atom in your body is accelerated towards the ground at 10 m/s^2. this is not an equilibrium state.
These atoms also react to position (ie: relative to surface of the earth) and with time. Where do you see a neutral state ?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
the thing is GD now you are giving the "atom" an ENVIROMENT. recall what i said before.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 11 months ago #12190
by GD
Replied by GD on topic Reply from
North,
Today's physics is based on 17th century theories. Is this what you are basing your theory on ? Or are you starting from scratch ?
The neutral state of the atom you refer to, has been preached for a few centuries. It is as if theories become law simply by the number of times we pray.
The atom and its environment ARE linked together.
Today's physics is based on 17th century theories. Is this what you are basing your theory on ? Or are you starting from scratch ?
The neutral state of the atom you refer to, has been preached for a few centuries. It is as if theories become law simply by the number of times we pray.
The atom and its environment ARE linked together.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 11 months ago #11805
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by GD</i>
<br />North,
Today's physics is based on 17th century theories. Is this what you are basing your theory on ? Or are you starting from scratch ?
The neutral state of the atom you refer to, has been preached for a few centuries. It is as if theories become law simply by the number of times we pray.
The atom and its environment ARE linked together.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
think, what more can i say. i gave you a possibility thats all.
i now need time to myself.
<br />North,
Today's physics is based on 17th century theories. Is this what you are basing your theory on ? Or are you starting from scratch ?
The neutral state of the atom you refer to, has been preached for a few centuries. It is as if theories become law simply by the number of times we pray.
The atom and its environment ARE linked together.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
think, what more can i say. i gave you a possibility thats all.
i now need time to myself.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 11 months ago #10997
by GD
Replied by GD on topic Reply from
Sorry North,
I think this subject is getting to me. I'm taking some time off myself.
I think this subject is getting to me. I'm taking some time off myself.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 11 months ago #10999
by north
GD
i came across something interesting the other day. that the electron is not spining around the nucleus of an atom but around the "common center of gravity" and so is the nucleus. at least in mainstream physics.
now isn't that interesting!!
Replied by north on topic Reply from
GD
i came across something interesting the other day. that the electron is not spining around the nucleus of an atom but around the "common center of gravity" and so is the nucleus. at least in mainstream physics.
now isn't that interesting!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 11 months ago #12254
by north
TOM
the book is by Gerhard Herzberg(ISBN# 0-486-60115-3, Dover) atomic spectra and atomic struture.
now can this help you or hinder you? i don't know but it is an argument that we must consider, otherwise they(mainstream) will use it against your theory. it is part of the quantum theory by Bohr.
Replied by north on topic Reply from
TOM
the book is by Gerhard Herzberg(ISBN# 0-486-60115-3, Dover) atomic spectra and atomic struture.
now can this help you or hinder you? i don't know but it is an argument that we must consider, otherwise they(mainstream) will use it against your theory. it is part of the quantum theory by Bohr.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.348 seconds