Gravity Probe B

More
20 years 6 months ago #9578 by tvanflandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim</i>
<br />So then the tiny gravitron is the center of a tiny planetary system that has tiny beings on it? The picture seems the same as the solar system in tiny scale. How am I getting this wrong? Or do I have it correct as you seem to be describing scale in the MM?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">MM says the universe is fundamentally the same at all scales from infinitesimal to infinite. There is nothing special about our scale. -|Tom|-

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 6 months ago #9580 by PheoniX_VII
Then how come the electrons dont have the same way of rotation as the planets around the sun ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 6 months ago #9793 by Skarp
Replied by Skarp on topic Reply from jim jim
Should the MM go without saying that there is an infinity of exact replicas of us on every scale, including our scale.

The MM plays with infinity as a bonafide fact where anything is possible, accept the possibility of proving it. For example - If I pick my nose right now, there should be an infinity of me picking my nose on other scales ,,,,,,,,,,,, even at the same time,,,,,,,,,,,,,even on the same scale - There being an infinity of possibilities available.

The model is even philosophically challenging to know that not only are you not important, but meaningless, on every scale, in every moment, and yes - There is an infinity of that also.

Correct me if I'm wrong - Our scale......The only one I know of from perspective is infinite by MMs reasoning. If I go out and wash my car - I can expect that somewhere a gazillion light years from the location of the car is another me washing a car, and another location of me washing a different color car, or a car with a dent to the right door, and another location of me with a beard washing a different make of car, and , and , and ........... There is no end, there are no rules cuz somewhere out there is me washing my car while Godzilla helps me pick my nose on a sunny day on planet Waznit that orbits an Earth just like ours with the same people on it as this Earth, and , and , and ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 6 months ago #9612 by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
Oh, now,now its just a model nothing to get all lathered up about.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 6 months ago #9613 by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
Tom

aren't all planets and i mean all planets,part of a solar system?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 6 months ago #9581 by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by tvanflandern</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by north</i>
<br />Ans: so when this "protoplanet" becomes more solid we become imbeded in it!!? i mean the whole of our universe!!?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I don't know what you mean by "becomes more solid". But ignoring that, how is our situation any different from that of a microbe on an atom deep in the Earth's interior, or deep in the ocean, or high in the atmosphere, or in the interstellar medium?
____________________________________________________________________

Ans: none developed into our potential,so an Earth like enviroment is apparently important for overall maximum development, a balance of enviroment.

_____________________________________________________________________

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Ans: what about in our universe, why could we not have an example of this graviton here? could you not figure out a way to detect a large scale graviton that perhaps we or whatever is orbiting?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">We have detected a countless number of them. We name them planets or stars or galaxies or galaxy clusters or superclusters or "great walls". The one we are orbiting is named "Sol".
____________________________________________________________________

Ans: what exactly is named "Sol" and why are we naming it?

____________________________________________________________________

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Ans: why could there not be a large scale medium?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">There is. Scale is infinite in both directions, just like the other four dimensions.
___________________________________________________________________

Ans: so like Aristotle,sphere within a sphere within a sphere?

____________________________________________________________________

[<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">by the way another way to look at the Cavendish experiment could be absorbing aether approach, pulling action<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">The momentum transferred in an absorption event is still a push.
_____________________________________________________________________

Ans: explain, tried to look it up in pushing gravity,no index.

____________________________________________________________________

Ans: and perhaps mine won't either however using a fluid-dynamic approach would give us a more in depth picture of what is going on out there and help us see if there any small or large dynamics we may have missed and i'm not the only one who thinks this.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I'm not suggesting we ignore any tools that might help us. I am suggesting that we avoid the "one-tool" approach. The problem with that approach is "When the only tool you have is a hammer, all your problems start to look like nails..." [:)] -|Tom|-
____________________________________________________________________

Ans: actually theories are the tools, fluid-dynamics is the through expression of these theories,it allows these ideas on there own or in combinations to see there ramifications in 3D with no prejudice.this is because that the flow is completely dependent on the theory(s) its self.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.349 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum