- Thank you received: 0
quantum gravity replication theory
13 years 7 months ago #21150
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
sorry I have been very busy the past few days...
I tryed to get it on utube and cant do anything
with that.. so I will try vimeo
MARX
I tryed to get it on utube and cant do anything
with that.. so I will try vimeo
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 7 months ago #21171
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Hi every one!
The simulation is now on vimeo here is the link
www.vimeo.com/22676773
Thanks & Cheers
MARX
The simulation is now on vimeo here is the link
www.vimeo.com/22676773
Thanks & Cheers
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 6 months ago #21176
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
I have made some more simulations of all levels 7
[epe] when you watch them from this perspective
you can see that the dark matter energy is inside
the proton and smashing it is really the only way to get
it out!
I have seen some thing else as well, I have seen that
in a hydrogen atom with only one proton there is a
electron in orbit and a photon where another electron wants
to b,e so what this looks like is that when a electron
fits in to the hole where the photon is the photon get ejected
and could indecate that there might be dark matter in the
holes... just thought someone would find that interesting
I will post the new simulations soon...
Cheers
MARX
[epe] when you watch them from this perspective
you can see that the dark matter energy is inside
the proton and smashing it is really the only way to get
it out!
I have seen some thing else as well, I have seen that
in a hydrogen atom with only one proton there is a
electron in orbit and a photon where another electron wants
to b,e so what this looks like is that when a electron
fits in to the hole where the photon is the photon get ejected
and could indecate that there might be dark matter in the
holes... just thought someone would find that interesting
I will post the new simulations soon...
Cheers
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 6 months ago #21190
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
HI all
I will be posting those simulations soon.
I have been busy on my book
A Dimensional Analysis of Plancks [space]
with [space] = 1 = [mass]^0[length]^0[time]^0[current]^0
while preposing a new dimension of [space] as a new base SI unit
MARX
I will be posting those simulations soon.
I have been busy on my book
A Dimensional Analysis of Plancks [space]
with [space] = 1 = [mass]^0[length]^0[time]^0[current]^0
while preposing a new dimension of [space] as a new base SI unit
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 6 months ago #21194
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Looking at [space] from Plancks perspective we find
Plancks[mass] = 2.176114e-8
Plancks[length] = 1.6160510e-35
Plancks[time] = 5.3905634e-44
Plancks[current] = 3.479+25
this gives a gravitational [force] of = 1.21056211324e+44
[mass][length][time]-2
and a [velocity] of 29979296.818358
[length][time]-1
and [energy] of 1956332455.11666
[mass][length]2[time]-2
most importantly at Plancks scale we see a gravitational acceleration of
[acceleration] = 5.56143346386314e+51
[length][time]-2
I get the sence here that space an gravity are the same substance
and there is a lot of energy at the Plancks scale and the
gravitational acceleration is massive
so how do we connect this to the Newtonian gravitational constant
6.67*10^-11
which is in [mass]-1[length]3[angle]2
Planck sees this as 1.93898435538e-97
with [mass]-1[length]3
MARX
Plancks[mass] = 2.176114e-8
Plancks[length] = 1.6160510e-35
Plancks[time] = 5.3905634e-44
Plancks[current] = 3.479+25
this gives a gravitational [force] of = 1.21056211324e+44
[mass][length][time]-2
and a [velocity] of 29979296.818358
[length][time]-1
and [energy] of 1956332455.11666
[mass][length]2[time]-2
most importantly at Plancks scale we see a gravitational acceleration of
[acceleration] = 5.56143346386314e+51
[length][time]-2
I get the sence here that space an gravity are the same substance
and there is a lot of energy at the Plancks scale and the
gravitational acceleration is massive
so how do we connect this to the Newtonian gravitational constant
6.67*10^-11
which is in [mass]-1[length]3[angle]2
Planck sees this as 1.93898435538e-97
with [mass]-1[length]3
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 6 months ago #21196
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Looking more into the neutrino shows some very important insights
viewing the electron as a photon and phonon that has gained suffiecent
energy and collided at a Planck rate and where the moment
in the constant filping from photon to phonon was just right.
the photon making up the electric field and the phonon making up the magnetic field
so really the photon and the phonon are the same thing changing back and forth in to
each other... then when you get the time rate of the photon and the other photon
just right then you have a collision of a phonon and a photon creating a electron
and stablelizing it which should be able to be done experimentally... but would
be very complex to carry trying to get the Planck[time] rates to presicly collide
a photon and a phonon with enougth energy to create a electron
then we can view the neutrino as a electron and a positron that have merged at a
right Planck[time] where both the fields ("4 fields" 2 of the electron 2 of the positron)
that are collapsing are neutral at the moment of the collision
this experiment can be carryed out as well with same amount of complex percision
described above...
MARX
viewing the electron as a photon and phonon that has gained suffiecent
energy and collided at a Planck rate and where the moment
in the constant filping from photon to phonon was just right.
the photon making up the electric field and the phonon making up the magnetic field
so really the photon and the phonon are the same thing changing back and forth in to
each other... then when you get the time rate of the photon and the other photon
just right then you have a collision of a phonon and a photon creating a electron
and stablelizing it which should be able to be done experimentally... but would
be very complex to carry trying to get the Planck[time] rates to presicly collide
a photon and a phonon with enougth energy to create a electron
then we can view the neutrino as a electron and a positron that have merged at a
right Planck[time] where both the fields ("4 fields" 2 of the electron 2 of the positron)
that are collapsing are neutral at the moment of the collision
this experiment can be carryed out as well with same amount of complex percision
described above...
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.267 seconds