No Direct Gravitation-Electromagnetism Interaction

More
17 years 6 days ago #18315 by Leo Vuyk
Replied by Leo Vuyk on topic Reply from
I will try to get the images direct here.
-img-http://bp0.blogger.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/Reb9W5HVbDI/AAAAAAAAAEk/bkgT66lto3A/s1600-h/webblog+1BH+++OLD+NEW+BH+4.jpg-/img-[img][/img]

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 6 days ago #18316 by Leo Vuyk
Replied by Leo Vuyk on topic Reply from
I must make a small but essential addition to my former post.
Not only Spiral Galaxies but also Lenticular Galaxies are supposed to have no massive black hole in the centre, as is also depicted on my Galaxy type overview image.

Leo Vuyk.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 7 months ago #21141 by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Stoat</i>
<br />Hi John, here's an article on the superlens. Six months ago there was a much fuller explanation but i can't find it anymore. I believe that that has to be down to the military taking an interest, for stealth technology. www.imperial.ac.uk/physics/about/news_events/awards/pendry.htm

I would argue that every bit of matter contains a radius where the r.i. goes negative. In a proton, or neutron, it's tiny, much smaller than h. For a sun it's about 3km in diameter.

So we need a bec material, to slowwn light to a crawl, and we need it to have neg r.i. qualities to allow ftl gravitons/photons to transfer their energy to sub light electrons and photons.

Note that the split ring magnetic resonators in the link article are the tricky bit to make. To get to the magic minus one r.i. we would need to use smaller resonators. That's one of the reasons why the toroidal model of the electron is of interest. In a BEC we do have paired electrons after all.

One thing that has to be noted about this research, they are not looking for neg r.i's in the millions/billions. This is because they don't believe that anything can go faster than light. I would argue that neg r.i. of billions is actually built into the very structure of matter.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

In my simulations I have seen a antiproton change to a torus
based on a specific increasing and decreasing frequency
you have to take in to account the electric and magnetic
field phase and potentials as well. if minipulated properly
you could turn a electron into a positron

Cheers,


MARX

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 7 months ago #24096 by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Quantum Entanglement is faster then light!
And if my simulations are right gravity is Quantum entangled
by there quarks color charge (or from another point of view
electron and positron color charge)...

MARX

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 years 9 months ago #13718 by n/a11
Replied by n/a11 on topic Reply from Diann Kelelr
Really this forum post has given me some great information regarding the relationship between Gravitation-Electromagnetism. Thanks for making such a nice post.

(in-sincere material deleted)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.236 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum