- Thank you received: 0
Naked Quasar Detected
19 years 2 months ago #14338
by PhilJ
Reply from Philip Janes was created by PhilJ
I use the term "black hole" advisedly. The term, arising from GR, implies the existence of an event horizon with finite size. It takes only a very minor adjustment to GR and the event horizon disappears into a singulariy.
Has it occurred to anyone else that a "black hole" might eventually consume all of its original host galaxy and then drift in search of a new host? The fact that we can still see it implies that matter is still being drawn into its center at a considerable rate, so there must be a fairly dense cloud surrounding it. This might be the "black holes" brief swan song before it vanishes from sight.
Maybe, in a collision of two galaxies, one galaxy s*****ed away most of the stars from the other galaxy, and the "black hole" emerged practically nude. Maybe nude "black holes" are the rule, rather than the exception. We don't see most of them because they have run out of fuel; but if we look hard enough, maybe we can detect their gravity-lensing effect. If there is dark matter to be found, this might account for a large share of it.
What happens to the matter when it is "consumed" by a "black hole"? Does it simply grow more massive? We know that some "black holes", at least, spew jets of anti-matter from their polar axes at about 1/2 c. Maybe that is the ultimate fate of most of the matter; after it spins inward faster and faster, it ultimately emerges as anti-matter at 90 degrees to the galactic plane. Eventually, I would guess, the last remnants of matter lack the necessary gravity to continue the process.
Could there be anti-matter galaxies being sucked into "anti-black holes" and converted to regular matter? That would answer the question of where the matter comes from. Since anti-matter looks like regular matter moving backward in time, the entropy accumulated in one system would be reversed in the other. A closed universe with equal amounts of matter and antimatter could maintaim a constant amount of entropy and run forever without running down.
Has it occurred to anyone else that a "black hole" might eventually consume all of its original host galaxy and then drift in search of a new host? The fact that we can still see it implies that matter is still being drawn into its center at a considerable rate, so there must be a fairly dense cloud surrounding it. This might be the "black holes" brief swan song before it vanishes from sight.
Maybe, in a collision of two galaxies, one galaxy s*****ed away most of the stars from the other galaxy, and the "black hole" emerged practically nude. Maybe nude "black holes" are the rule, rather than the exception. We don't see most of them because they have run out of fuel; but if we look hard enough, maybe we can detect their gravity-lensing effect. If there is dark matter to be found, this might account for a large share of it.
What happens to the matter when it is "consumed" by a "black hole"? Does it simply grow more massive? We know that some "black holes", at least, spew jets of anti-matter from their polar axes at about 1/2 c. Maybe that is the ultimate fate of most of the matter; after it spins inward faster and faster, it ultimately emerges as anti-matter at 90 degrees to the galactic plane. Eventually, I would guess, the last remnants of matter lack the necessary gravity to continue the process.
Could there be anti-matter galaxies being sucked into "anti-black holes" and converted to regular matter? That would answer the question of where the matter comes from. Since anti-matter looks like regular matter moving backward in time, the entropy accumulated in one system would be reversed in the other. A closed universe with equal amounts of matter and antimatter could maintaim a constant amount of entropy and run forever without running down.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
19 years 2 months ago #12631
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
PhilJ,
To the best of my knowledge all of the jets we observe out there are composed of normal matter.
LB
To the best of my knowledge all of the jets we observe out there are composed of normal matter.
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 2 months ago #14346
by PhilJ
Replied by PhilJ on topic Reply from Philip Janes
Antimatter Fountain at center of Milkyway Galaxy
NRL Press Release
Enormous Plume of Antimatter Alters View of Milky Way
More results from Google
[Addendum, a few minutes later:] After reading a few articles, I realize that this recent discovery offers only a very weak support for my hypothesis. Nonetheless, it is cool to contemplate.
NRL Press Release
Enormous Plume of Antimatter Alters View of Milky Way
More results from Google
[Addendum, a few minutes later:] After reading a few articles, I realize that this recent discovery offers only a very weak support for my hypothesis. Nonetheless, it is cool to contemplate.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
19 years 2 months ago #12634
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
PhilJ,
No doubt about it - new discoveries usually are pretty cool.
===
Weak support can be found for *any* idea. (Even something as obviously wrong as "all men are created equal".) That is why the words "evidence" and "proof" are not synonyms. As we discover each new piece of the puzzle and begin searching for what it means, we should not let the "coolness of contemplation" cloud our judgement.
LB
NOTE - If anyopne wants to discuss my potentially controversial "all men" example, I suggest starting a new thread for that purpose. It would rapidly become off-topic here if we go beyond this point.
No doubt about it - new discoveries usually are pretty cool.
===
Weak support can be found for *any* idea. (Even something as obviously wrong as "all men are created equal".) That is why the words "evidence" and "proof" are not synonyms. As we discover each new piece of the puzzle and begin searching for what it means, we should not let the "coolness of contemplation" cloud our judgement.
LB
NOTE - If anyopne wants to discuss my potentially controversial "all men" example, I suggest starting a new thread for that purpose. It would rapidly become off-topic here if we go beyond this point.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.413 seconds