CMB correlated to Solar System

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Astrodelugeologist</i>
<br />COSMIC ODDITY CASTS DOUBT ON THEORY OF THE UNIVERSE<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Thanks for posting this. Readers of MRB will already be familiar with it because we had an article in our December 15 issue. In fact, I predicted something like this in my book <i>Dark Matter...</i> as a consequence of the most recent planetary explosion event. -|Tom|-

redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V02no1PDF/V02N1MAM.PDF
<center><b>The Origin of the 3° K Radiation</b>

Physics Department
University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Canada K1N 6N5</center>

It is recalled that one of the most fundamental laws of physics leads to the prediction that all matter emits electromagnetic radiation. That radiation, called Planck radiation, covers an electromagnetic spectrum that is characterized by the absolute temperature of the emitting matter. From astronomical observations, we know that most matter in the universe is in the gaseous phase at 3° K. Stars,of course, are much hotter. The characteristic Planck spectrum, corresponding to 3° K, is actually observed in the universe exactly as required. However, in the standard model of the universe, the simple fundamental Planck law has been ignored. It is claimed that the observed radiation comes from a combination of complicated hy-potheses, involving an elaborate creation event called the Big Bang. After this event, the radiation would have been emitted at a single instant when matter became decoupled from radiation. Finally, that radiation would have been shifted, increasing its wavelength about 1000 times. We show that the 3° K radiation observed is simply the Planck radiation emitted by gaseous matter at3° K.

www.dfi.uem.br/~macedane/history_of_2.7k.html



<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">



<center><b>History of 2.7 K Temperature Prior to Penzias and Wilson(1)</b>
André Koch Torres Assis* & Marcos Cesar Danhoni Neves**


Instituto de Física "Gleb Wataghin", Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-970, Campinas-SP, Brasil, e-mail: assis@ifi.unicamp.br
** Departamento de Física, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Av. Colombo, 5790, 87020-900, Maringá-PR, Brasil, e-mail: macedane@yahoo.com


We present the history of estimates of the temperature of intergalactic space. We begin with the works of Guillaume and Eddington on the temperature of interstellar space due to starlight belonging to our Milky Way galaxy. Then we discuss works relating to cosmic radiation, concentrating on Regener and Nernst. We also discuss Finlay-Freundlich’s and Max Born’s important research on this topic. Finally, we present the work of Gamow and collaborators. We show that the models based on an Universe in dynamical equilibrium without expansion predicted the 2.7 K temperature prior to and better than models based on the Big Bang.
PACS: 98.70.Vc Background radiations

98.80.-k Cosmology

98.80Bp Origin and formation of the Universe

Key Words: Cosmic background radiation, temperature of intergalactic space, blackblody radiation


Introduction
In 1965 Penzias and Wilson discovered the Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR) utilizing a horn reflector antenna built to study radio astronomy (Penzias and Wilson 1965). They found a temperature of 3.5± 1.0 K observing background radiation at 7.3 cm wavelength. This was soon interpreted as a relic of the hot Big Bang with a blackbody spectrum (Dicke et al. 1965). The finding was considered a proof of the standard cosmological model of the Universe based on the expansion on the Universe (the Big Bang), which had predicted this temperature with the works of Gamow and collaborators.
In this paper we show that other models of a Universe in dynamical equilibrium without expansion had predicted this temperature prior to Gamow. Moreover, we show that Gamow’s own predictions were worse than these previous ones.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Tommy:
Dr. Paul Mermet was exactly right! The energy of 3 K CMB came from star radiations. As matter of fact, I calculated the completely precise value of 2.724K, which is well within margin of error of the observed 2.725 +- 0.005 K. Not only that, if you reverse the calculation and assume the Sun is a typical star, you can obtain the solar constant to be 1360 Watts/m^2/Second, which is exactly correct. See my BLOG for more details:
quantoken.blogspot.com
Specifically, look at this entry:
quantoken.blogspot.com/2005/02/predictio...f-guitar-theory.html
Quantoken

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Tommy</i>
<br /> redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V02no1PDF/V02N1MAM.PDF
<center><b>The Origin of the 3° K Radiation</b>

Physics Department
University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Canada K1N 6N5</center>

It is recalled that one of the most fundamental laws of physics leads to the prediction that all matter emits electromagnetic radiation. That radiation, called Planck radiation, covers an electromagnetic spectrum that is characterized by the absolute temperature of the emitting matter. From astronomical observations, we know that most matter in the universe is in the gaseous phase at 3° K. Stars,of course, are much hotter. The characteristic Planck spectrum, corresponding to 3° K, is actually observed in the universe exactly as required. However, in the standard model of the universe, the simple fundamental Planck law has been ignored. It is claimed that the observed radiation comes from a combination of complicated hy-potheses, involving an elaborate creation event called the Big Bang. After this event, the radiation would have been emitted at a single instant when matter became decoupled from radiation. Finally, that radiation would have been shifted, increasing its wavelength about 1000 times. We show that the 3° K radiation observed is simply the Planck radiation emitted by gaseous matter at 3° K.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Not necessarily.
Common laser experiments show that beams of light propagating in convenient media exchange energy (in conformity with thermodynamics), so that the beams which have a high temperature (deduced from Planck's laws) are redshifted without blur of the images. The theory, well verified in laser experiments, shows that for usual light, almost only excited atomic hydrogen 2S and 2P (called H*) "catalyses" these non quantified exchanges of energy.
The CMB is nearly isotropic (except close to much redshifted hot objects, without need of hot dust) because the thermalisation of a perturbed CMB is very strong by this effect.
At the limit of the solar system, the solar wind, produced by the anisotropic corona, cools and produces H*, so that the energy provided by the redshift of the solar light amplifies the CMB anisotropically. Simultaneously, it blueshifts the frequencies of the Pioneer probes...
For more, see arxiv:Physics/0503070.