string theory - complete nonsense?

My question and your statement about absorption/emission is a topic I'm interested in while the other stuff is of little or no interest to me. You seem to have this detail all figured out and I would suggest you have it all wrong but if you want to chat about the other stuff then I'll do a pass and not comment any more about the absorption/emission detail here.

The absorbtion/emission issue is less related to this thread than the idea of dimensions in space-time, so I'll start another one for that specific issue.

mhelland@techmocracy.net

This is what "String Theory" is all about.Its strictly based upon Kabballistic literature and the intuitive research of Besant and Leadbeater of the late 20th century. The basic structure of the universe is a double whorl of space called by many names; Anu, strings, tori, vortex, space, "Platonic solids", geometric structure, gematria, geometry, etc. Michio Kaku portrays these whirling vortexes as single strings, however, the whole structure is a continuous whorl of space, 7 levels deep, in one structure. Phillips portrays these double whorls stylistically, as two sets of 7 geometric solids with a common side.

smphillips.8m.com/html/articles.html

Meta
rgrace@rgrace.org
www.rgrace.org

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by wisp</i>
<br />emanuel

Personally I think string theory is way off the mark. Mathematically it is able to predict the existence and properties of new fundamental particles. But in terms of telling us what nature is, it’s wrong, and I think this has something to do with special relativity. Using the rules of special relativity string theory is constrained to one-dimensional strings. They tried developing it with 3-dimentional blobs, but it failed to comply with the rules of Einstein's relativity.
Maybe Einstein’s concept of spacetime is wrong and a 3-dimensional blob theory would give us a better understanding of how the universe works.

Myself, I just believe in 3-dimensions of space and a separate time dimension. I can’t see how the universe can have more than 3-dimensions of space.



wisp

- particles of nothingness
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

In reality there are an infinite number of <b><i>dimensions</i></b>. We just use 3 axes to describe them in terms of XYZ. There are an endless number of <b><i>directions</i></b> emanating from the 0,0,0 nucleus and a positive coordinate for every negative one.

If someone finds a direction which I have not seen, please advise me at once for I would certainly like to explore it.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Messiah</i>
<br />

<i>Originally posted by wisp</i>
<br />emanuel

Personally I think string theory is way off the mark. Mathematically it is able to predict the existence and properties of new fundamental particles. But in terms of telling us what nature is, it’s wrong, and I think this has something to do with special relativity. Using the rules of special relativity string theory is constrained to one-dimensional strings. They tried developing it with 3-dimentional blobs, but it failed to comply with the rules of Einstein's relativity.
Maybe Einstein’s concept of spacetime is wrong and a 3-dimensional blob theory would give us a better understanding of how the universe works.

Myself, I just believe in 3-dimensions of space and a separate time dimension. I can’t see how the universe can have more than 3-dimensions of space.



wisp

There are an endless number of <b><i>directions</i></b> emanating from the 0,0,0 nucleus<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Messiah

what do you mean by this statement?

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by north</i>
<br />

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">There are an endless number of <b><i>directions</i></b> emanating from the 0,0,0 nucleus<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Messiah

what do you mean by this statement?

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

If you stand in one place, the distinct number if directions in which you can point is endless. I consider these directions to be 'dimensions' which are described relative to 3 axes, XYZ. The axes are not "dimensions" they are axes by which we may describe an infinite number of dimensions.