Human Habitation of Europa

Peter:

It would be nice if you considered the site you are posting on, and compared the pros and cons of your theories with the models for the same phenomena that are part of Meta Science. That way, people would have a basis for comparison, instead of the usual reaction: "Oh, no, not theory #999!"

Moreover, in general, it is not good netiquette to use someone else's site to post links to your own. Put enough information in your messages here to form the basis for discussion without need to click external links. It is then okay to add a link to supplemental or supporting materials, as appropriate. Otherwise, it becomes too much like advertising. -|Tom|-

Thanks Tom, points taken.

I will be looking more at the Meta Science content of your site in the very near future. I'd been attracted to your site in the first place by its unusual, similar use to mine of the prefix Meta-.

My ebook subtitle is "A Planetary MetaGeology" and its Volume 5, paper 5.1 content is described as "MetaSociology".

When your site came up, I was pleased to find an interest there in life on other planets, recalling my own interest and comments on human habitation in my 2.3 and so on.

My 2.2 explanation of Europa's double ridges as subsided, rolled, spiralised "petal" cylinders, most likely containing caves suitable for human habitation needs to be "gotten out there" to those interested in space colonisation . . .

Peter Nielsen

Email: uusi@hotkey.net.au
Post: 12 View St, Sandy Bay 7005, Australia