The implications of finding absolute proof.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />
This was a quote from Francis Bacon but surely was not meant as a "blanket" observation of your input. However, I think we should take a position that we need to look a little closer on these anomalies. Just because you have adopted the position of "it's not really there, it's just the way my brain see's it" can, in my opinion lead to a lack of understanding in the way the Alien life on Mars operates. I'm going to try and explain this a little better in a new post.

Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I think we'd get somewhere a heck of a lot faster if you studied Pareidolia and the way the mind fuses partial images.

Just sayin'.

There's nothing "fuzzy" about my monitor and graphics card. What's fuzzy are the images themselves. At least to the extent they are supposed to be representative of something other than some unknown landscape.

rd

In the final analysis, truth will prevail. If someone has definitive proof, or even overwhelming evidence that Intelligent Life lives or lived on Mars, I would think that information would be worth it's weight in gold, and could prove to be highly profitable to the person who found it.

That's where the rubber would hit the road though.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br />In the final analysis, truth will prevail. If someone has definitive proof, or even overwhelming evidence that Intelligent Life lives or lived on Mars, I would think that information would be worth it's weight in gold, and could prove to be highly profitable to the person who found it.

That's where the rubber would hit the road though.


<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Rich, Interesting. Would you like to collaborate on that proof?

Malcolm Scott

"There are no proofs, merely interpretations." Nietzsche.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by pareidoliac</i>
<br />"There are no proofs, merely interpretations." Nietzsche.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Not necessarily - all things are interpreted differently to different people, "an apple is a seed but it is also food as well as a target". Proof is but a word. If you think you have it, then it MUST be interpreted.

Yes, there is "proof" on Mars but one man's interpretation is another man's question. No?

Malcolm Scott

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by pareidoliac</i>
<br />"There are no proofs, merely interpretations." Nietzsche.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

There is only ONE question that needs to be answered - is there inrelligent life elsewhere other than Earth? Once this question is answered, then the gates will open (and so will the can of worms)

Malcolm Scott