Intelligent activity ongoing in Hebes Chasma

More
10 years 9 months ago #22106 by rderosa
Interesting, but not definitive.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #22109 by Larry Burford
<b>[Malcolm] "At first glance, these strange looking terrace like structures seem to be a natural part of the landscape."</b>

This is the first time I've seen these pictures (they have been here for about 7 months). The instant I saw them my mind said 'artificial'. Especially the smaller one. (How can YOU not see that?)

But after some inspection I decided that they are after all natural. 90+% confidence. One cannot be sure without GOING THERE, of course.

***

Rent-A-Rover! (TM)

Coming soon to a planet near you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #22110 by Marsevidence01
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br /><b>[Malcolm] "At first glance, these strange looking terrace like structures seem to be a natural part of the landscape."</b>

This is the first time I've seen these pictures (they have been here for about 7 months). The instant I saw them my mind said 'artificial'. Especially the smaller one. (How can YOU not see that?)

But after some inspection I decided that they are after all natural. 90+% confidence. One cannot be sure without GOING THERE, of course.

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Now this IS facinating. So tell me Larry, how long did it take you to going from "first glance of artificial" to "I decided they are natural" and what was it that had you going from this one view to another?

Malcolm Scott

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #22112 by Larry Burford
An hour or so.

Not enough detail.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #22390 by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />Not enough detail.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

<i>BINGO!</i>

rd

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #22113 by Marsevidence01
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />Not enough detail.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

<i>BINGO!</i>

rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

So we dismiss this as "natural"

Now, if this image was taken on a new "landscape" somewhere in an unkown area of mountains located on Earth, the obvious presumption is that they do look artificial.

Secondly, there is more than enough detail IF you are prepared to go right in close. This where the Hi Res monitor comes in handy. Also, if you do feel so inclined, I suggest using a virtual "loupe". One can only zoom in so far until the pixels distort.

Try it and you'll get the detail, it's there and quite compelling.

Malcolm Scott

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.242 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum