>>the bubble of elysons that were tagged blue before M began moving
Some of these blue elysons are bound to the matter ingredients in M. That is, they have lost the ability to move away from M (first degree of freedom). Some will also possibly have lost the ability to vibrate in place (second degree of freedom). Some may even be so tightly compacted against the matter ingredients of M that they cannot even rotate (third degree of freedom). All of the elysons that have lost at least the first degree of freedom necessarily travel with M, making M appear to be bigger than it is, a billiard ball of sorts made of a composite of the matter ingredients and the elysons bound to them. So the billiard ball complex which is M then creates a wake as it traverses the elyson medium resulting in your state of static entrainment.
If this is the case, then the wake of M would be it's DeBroglie wave in quantum physics.
With further acceleration of the body M the elysons which it impacts might strike with such force (actually, it is the elysons bound to M that are imparting the force) that they displace the elysons bound to M by only the loss of their first degree of freedom. The prevviously bound elysons would re-enter the bulk elysium, the newly captured elysons would stay with M and continue to travel with it.
Likewise, even further acceleration would result in exchange with some elysons bound by to M by their loss of two degrees of freedom. And with continuing acceleration the most tightly bound elysons would start to exchange with the bulk elysium.
So the situation in nature, in which elysons of the bulk elysium are always in motion with some statistical distribution of velocities, would be some equilibrium of all three dynamic exchange processes. It follows that it should be possible to calculate a theoretical model for the binding energies related to the different degrees of freedom of the elysons. The hard part is theorizing what exactly a matter ingredient is. But it does become apparent from this model that our perception of baryonic matter must include elysons as a significant part of their composition.
Extending this excercise to describe what occurs in a particle accelerator informs us of the magnitude of forces involved in elyson binding. In this case, two bodies M0 and M1 are accelerated enough to overcome the binding energies of enough elysons around their matter ingredients to allow some matter ingredients of M0 to to touch matter ingredients of M1, and the M0M1 combined body to then become surrounded again - as a composite unit - by an elyson shroud. We know from the tremendous energies required for, say, nuclear fusion to occur that the binding energies of elysons must be tremendously large.
To put this into perspective with regard to the gravitational theory of the meta model, recall that the binding of elysons to matter ingredients is the result of gravitons pounding against the elysons and driving them against the matter ingredients, in turn the result of the matter ingredients deflecting, and sometimes absorbing, gravitons. What this says about gravitons is that the energy they impart to elysons must be very high.
It must also be the case, for the meta model to be correct, that elysons must be more 'transparent' to gravitons than matter ingredients, but not completely transparent to them. Otherwise, it would be matter ingredients that accumulated around elysons and not vice-versa. It is interesting to speculate how an elyson can be semi-transparent to gravitons. Such speculation would be valuable to developing a model of the elyson.
I wonder, for instance, whether the difference in 'transparency' could be simply the result of a differential in the volume of the elyson with respect to matter ingredients.
Or, for matter ingredients, could the dominance of diffraction (deflection) over absorbtion required by the meta model be the result of the presence of the bound layer of elysons such that gravitons seldom get to penetrate to the depth require to be absorbed by the matter ingredient? And if so, would graviton absorbtion really be nothing more than the same phenomenon described for the case of particle fusion described above in the example of the particle accelerator, except at a much smaller scale?
No great thing was ever created suddenly - Epictitus
Topic Author
